使用RSpec＆amp; amp;测试给定布局的渲染轨道

Question

是否可以使用带有Rails的RSpec测试给定布局的使用，例如我想要一个执行以下操作的匹配器：

response.should use_layout('my_layout_name')

我在谷歌搜索时发现了一个use_layout匹配器，但它不起作用，因为响应或控制器似乎都没有匹配器正在寻找的布局属性。

Answer 1

David Chelimsky在Ruby Forum上发表了一个很好的答案：

response.should render_template("layouts/some_layout")

Answer 2

这适用于我在Rails上使用边缘Rails和边缘RSpec：

response.layout.should == 'layouts/application'

不应该把它变成适合你的匹配器。

Answer 3

已经有一个功能完善的匹配器：

response.should render_template(:layout => 'fooo')

（Rspec 2.6.4）

Answer 4

我找到了一个how to write a use_layout matcher的例子。以下是链接消失的代码：

# in spec_helper.rb

class UseLayout
   def initialize(expected)
     @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
   end
   def matches?(controller)
     @actual = controller.layout
     #@actual.equal?(@expected)
     @actual == @expected
   end
   def failure_message
     return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got # 
{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
   end
   def negeative_failure_message
     return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal # 
{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
   end
end


def use_layout(expected)
   UseLayout.new(expected)
end

# in controller spec
   response.should use_layout("application")

Answer 5

我必须编写以下内容才能完成这项工作：

response.should render_template("layouts/some_folder/some_layout", "template-name")

Answer 6

这是匹配器的更新版本。我已经更新它以符合最新版本的RSpec。我添加了相关的只读属性并删除了旧的返回格式。

# in spec_helper.rb

class UseLayout
  attr_reader :expected
  attr_reader :actual

  def initialize(expected)
    @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
  end

  def matches?(controller)
    if controller.is_a?(ActionController::Base)
      @actual = 'layouts/' + controller.class.read_inheritable_attribute(:layout)
    else
      @actual = controller.layout
    end
    @actual ||= "layouts/application"
    @actual == @expected
  end

  def description
    "Determines if a controller uses a layout"
  end

  def failure_message
    return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got #{@actual.inspect}"
  end

 def negeative_failure_message
   return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal #{@actual.inspect}"
  end
end

def use_layout(expected)
  UseLayout.new(expected)
end

此外，匹配器现在也可以使用在控制器类级别指定的布局，可以按如下方式使用：

class PostsController < ApplicationController
  layout "posts"
end

在控制器规范中，您只需使用：

it { should use_layout("posts") }

Answer 7

这是我最终选择的解决方案。它用于rpsec 2和rails 3.
我刚刚在spec / support目录中添加了这个文件。 链接是：https://gist.github.com/971342     

# spec/support/matchers/render_layout.rb


ActionView::Base.class_eval do
  unless instance_methods.include?('_render_layout_with_tracking')
    def _render_layout_with_tracking(layout, locals, &block)
      controller.instance_variable_set(:@_rendered_layout, layout)
      _render_layout_without_tracking(layout, locals, &block)
    end
    alias_method_chain :_render_layout, :tracking
  end
end

# You can use this matcher anywhere that you have access to the controller instance,
# like in controller or integration specs.
#
# == Example Usage
#
# Expects no layout to be rendered:
#   controller.should_not render_layout
# Expects any layout to be rendered:
#   controller.should render_layout
# Expects app/views/layouts/application.html.erb to be rendered:
#   controller.should render_layout('application')
# Expects app/views/layouts/application.html.erb not to be rendered:
#   controller.should_not render_layout('application')
# Expects app/views/layouts/mobile/application.html.erb to be rendered:
#   controller.should_not render_layout('mobile/application')
RSpec::Matchers.define :render_layout do |*args|
  expected = args.first
  match do |c|
    actual = get_layout(c)
    if expected.nil?
      !actual.nil? # actual must be nil for the test to pass.  Usage: should_not render_layout
    elsif actual
      actual == expected.to_s
    else
      false
    end
  end

failure_message_for_should do |c|
    actual = get_layout(c)
    if actual.nil? && expected.nil?
      "expected a layout to be rendered but none was"
    elsif actual.nil?
      "expected layout #{expected.inspect} but no layout was rendered"
    else
      "expected layout #{expected.inspect} but #{actual.inspect} was rendered"
    end
  end

failure_message_for_should_not do |c|
    actual = get_layout(c)
    if expected.nil?
      "expected no layout but #{actual.inspect} was rendered"
    else
      "expected #{expected.inspect} not to be rendered but it was"
    end
  end

def get_layout(controller)
    if template = controller.instance_variable_get(:@_rendered_layout)
      template.virtual_path.sub(/layouts\//, '')
    end
  end
end

Answer 8

controller.active_layout.name适合我。

Answer 9

response.should render_template("layouts/some_folder/some_layout") response.should render_template("template-name")

Answer 10

这是dmcnally代码的一个版本，它允许不传递任何参数，使“should use_layout”和“should_not use_layout”工作（断言控制器分别使用任何布局，或者没有布局 - 我期望只有第二个有用，因为如果它使用布局，你应该更具体：）

class UseLayout
   def initialize(expected = nil)
     if expected.nil?
       @expected = nil
     else
       @expected = 'layouts/' + expected
     end
   end
   def matches?(controller)
     @actual = controller.layout
     #@actual.equal?(@expected)
     if @expected.nil?
       @actual
     else
       @actual == @expected
     end
   end
   def failure_message
     if @expected.nil?
       return 'use_layout expected a layout to be used, but none was', 'any', @actual
     else
       return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect}, got #{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
     end
   end
   def negative_failure_message
     if @expected.nil?
       return "use_layout expected no layout to be used, but #{@actual.inspect} found", 'any', @actual
     else
       return "use_layout expected #{@expected.inspect} not to equal #{@actual.inspect}", @expected, @actual
     end
   end
end


def use_layout(expected = nil)
   UseLayout.new(expected)
end

Answer 11

Shoulda Matchers provides a matcher for this scenario. (Documentation) This seems to work:

       expect(response).to render_with_layout('my_layout')

it produces appropriate failure messages like:

Expected to render with the "calendar_layout" layout, but rendered with "application", "application"

Tested with rails 4.2, rspec 3.3 and shoulda-matchers 2.8.0

Edit: shoulda-matchers provides this method. Shoulda::Matchers::ActionController::RenderWithLayoutMatcher