在分析其中一个生产环境的日志时,我在countdownlatch上看到一个处于“WAITING”状态的线程await()
...sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
...java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(Unknown Source)
...java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(Unknown Source)
...java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedInterruptibly(Unknown Source)
...java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireSharedInterruptibly(Unknown Source)
...java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(Unknown Source)
锁存器初始化为1,另一个线程确实在锁存器的同一个实例上调用了countDown()方法,但主线程仍然在锁存器上被阻塞。这导致jvm无限期挂起。
即使锁存计数达到零也被阻止听起来不合理,我正在寻找有关进一步解决此问题的建议。
有什么想法吗?
注 - 使用的jvm版本如下
java版“1.5.0_15” Java(TM)2运行时环境,标准版(版本1.5.0_15-b04) Java HotSpot(TM)客户端VM(版本1.5.0_15-b04,混合模式,共享)
更新 - 以下是我上面讨论的主题的代码片段
private class MyRunnable implements Runnable, Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler {
private AtomicBoolean shouldStop = new AtomicBoolean(false);
private CountDownLatch stopLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
private Thread currentThread;
public void run() {
Thread.currentThread().setName("My Thread");
Thread.currentThread().setUncaughtExceptionHandler(this);
currentThread = Thread.currentThread();
if (currentThread.isInterrupted()) {
logger.debug("The pool thread had its interrupted stattus set. Clearing...");
Thread.interrupted();
logger.debug("The pool thread had its interrupted stattus set. Clearing...DONE");
}
try {
doBusinessLogic(shouldStop);
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error("An exception was encountered in the thread", e);
} finally {
if (currentThread.isInterrupted()) {
logger.debug("Clearing interupted status for the thread and returning to pool...");
Thread.interrupted();
}
stopLatch.countDown();
logger.debug("Stopped task after counting down on the latch");
}
}
public void stopThread() {
shouldStop.set(true);
logger.debug("Stop flag was set to true.. waiting for thread method to return...");
try {
stopLatch.await();
logger.debug("Stop flag was set to true... task has finished. Returning.");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.error("Interrupted while awaiting thread stop event...", e);
}
}
public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable e) {
logger.error("An uncaught exception occurred in the task thread ", e);
}
private void doBusinessLogic(AtomicBoolean shouldStop) {
long sleepPeriod = 11;
while (!shouldStop.get()) {
try {
Thread.sleep(sleepPeriod);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.debug("Thread was interrupted.Clearing interrupted status and proceeding", e);
if (Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted())
Thread.interrupted();
}
if (shouldStop.get()) {
logger.debug("Stop flag was set. Returning.");
return;
}
try {
logger.debug("Performing business logic...");
//.....
logger.debug("Performing business logic...DONE");
} catch (Throwable e) {
logger.error("An exception occurred", e);
}
if (shouldStop.get()) {
logger.debug("Stop flag was set. Returning.");
return;
}
}
}
}
private class MyRunnable implements Runnable, Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler {
private AtomicBoolean shouldStop = new AtomicBoolean(false);
private CountDownLatch stopLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
private Thread currentThread;
public void run() {
Thread.currentThread().setName("My Thread");
Thread.currentThread().setUncaughtExceptionHandler(this);
currentThread = Thread.currentThread();
if (currentThread.isInterrupted()) {
logger.debug("The pool thread had its interrupted stattus set. Clearing...");
Thread.interrupted();
logger.debug("The pool thread had its interrupted stattus set. Clearing...DONE");
}
try {
doBusinessLogic(shouldStop);
} catch (Exception e) {
logger.error("An exception was encountered in the thread", e);
} finally {
if (currentThread.isInterrupted()) {
logger.debug("Clearing interupted status for the thread and returning to pool...");
Thread.interrupted();
}
stopLatch.countDown();
logger.debug("Stopped task after counting down on the latch");
}
}
public void stopThread() {
shouldStop.set(true);
logger.debug("Stop flag was set to true.. waiting for thread method to return...");
try {
stopLatch.await();
logger.debug("Stop flag was set to true... task has finished. Returning.");
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.error("Interrupted while awaiting thread stop event...", e);
}
}
public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable e) {
logger.error("An uncaught exception occurred in the task thread ", e);
}
private void doBusinessLogic(AtomicBoolean shouldStop) {
long sleepPeriod = 11;
while (!shouldStop.get()) {
try {
Thread.sleep(sleepPeriod);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
logger.debug("Thread was interrupted.Clearing interrupted status and proceeding", e);
if (Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted())
Thread.interrupted();
}
if (shouldStop.get()) {
logger.debug("Stop flag was set. Returning.");
return;
}
try {
logger.debug("Performing business logic...");
//.....
logger.debug("Performing business logic...DONE");
} catch (Throwable e) {
logger.error("An exception occurred", e);
}
if (shouldStop.get()) {
logger.debug("Stop flag was set. Returning.");
return;
}
}
}
}
以下是我在日志中看到的内容
从不打印latch.await()之后的logger语句,并且线程转储也表明主线程在锁存器上被阻塞。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我本来想把它写成评论,但我的声誉还不允许评论,所以我会在这里提供我的小经验。
我遇到了同样的问题。我的countDownLatch是从同步方法访问的:删除同步解决了问题(当然我必须调整方法的代码以应对没有同步)。我不知道如何解释这种行为。