指针和内存泄漏的递归

时间:2012-05-29 07:00:46

标签: c++ pointers memory-management memory-leaks recursion

我曾尝试编写一个简单的程序,将数字转换为单词(即将123转换为123)。代码完全编译。代码使用指针和递归,在c ++中,在内存管理方面,我总是觉得很棘手。任何人都可以指出,如果下面的代码在执行时有内存泄漏吗?提前谢谢。

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
char *convert_number(int, int);

const char *tens[]={"","ten", "twenty", "thirty", "forty", "fifty", "sixty", "seventy", "eighty", "ninety"};
const char *words[]={"zero","one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine","ten","eleven","twelve","thirteen","fourteen","fifteen","sixteen","seventeen", "eighteen","ninteen"};
const char *place[]={"","thouands","million","billion","trillion"};


int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
int number,conv_num,places;
places=1;
char *string= new char[1000];
char *temp_string = new char[100];
cout<<"Enter a number:";
cin>>number;
string = convert_number(number,0);
cout<<"The word is :"<<string<<endl;
}

char *convert_number(int number,int places)
{
int divisor;
char *word;
int conv_num;
char *temp_string = new char[100];
word = new char[100];
divisor=10;

if (number>=1000)
{   
    conv_num = number % 1000;
    number = (number-conv_num)/1000;
    places++;
    temp_string = convert_number(number,places);    
    word = strcat(word, temp_string);
    word = strcat(word, place[places]);
    word =strcat(word," ");
}
else
{
    conv_num = number;
}
if (conv_num>=100)
{
    word =strcat(word,words[conv_num/100]);
    word =strcat(word," hundred ");
    conv_num=conv_num%100;
}

if(conv_num >=20)
{
 word=strcat(word,tens[conv_num/10]);
 word =strcat(word," ");
 if(conv_num%divisor>=1)
 {
    word=strcat(word,words[conv_num%divisor]);  
    word =strcat(word," ");
  }
}

if(conv_num<20) 
{ 
    word=strcat(word,words[conv_num]);
    word =strcat(word," ");
}       
delete[] temp_string;       
return word;
}

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

  

&#34;任何人都可以指出,如果下面的代码在执行时会出现内存泄漏吗?&#34;

是的,它可以。

char *temp_string = new char[100];  // first assignment

[...]

if (number>=1000)
{   
[...]
    temp_string = convert_number(number,places); 

当您以这种方式重新分配temp_string时,第一次分配的内存将变得不可访问,并且尚未释放。你应该先delete[]