我试图理解为什么Valgrind报告“无效读取大小4”错误。代码编译并在Linux控制台上提供正确的输出 目标是构建一个动态数组struct record (最多10Mil项),这些项动态增长并通过struct list 按语言组织。
代码:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "../crc64.c"
typedef struct {
char cat;
uint64_t crc;
int id;
} record;
typedef struct {
int count;
char *lang;
record **records;
} list;
record *records = NULL;
int record_count = 0;
list *lists = NULL;
int list_count = 0;
void addItemToList(record *r, char *lang){
int found = 0;
for(int i = 0; i<list_count; i++){
if(strcmp(lists[i].lang, lang) == 0){
list *l = &lists[i];
found = 1;
record **tmp = realloc(l->records, (l->count + 1) * sizeof(record *));
if (tmp == NULL)
printf("Problem on realloc - records/list\n");
else{
l->records = tmp;
l->count ++;
l->records[l->count -1] = r;
}
break;
}
}
if(found == 0){
list_count ++;
list *tmp = realloc(lists, list_count * sizeof(list));
if(!tmp)
printf("Error on realloc - list");
lists = tmp;
lists[list_count - 1].count =1 ;
lists[list_count - 1].lang = lang ;
record **tmp1 = realloc(NULL, sizeof(record *));
if(!tmp1)
printf("Error on realloc records/list \n");
lists[list_count - 1].records = tmp1;
tmp1[0] = r;
}
}
int addRecord(char cat, char *name, int id, char lang[3]){
record *tmp;
if(record_count == 0){
tmp = malloc(1 * sizeof(record));
}
else
tmp = realloc(records, (record_count + 1) * sizeof(record));
if(tmp == NULL){
printf("Error on m(re)alloc records\n");
return(1);
}
records = tmp;
record r = {cat, crc64(name), id};
records[record_count ] = r;
addItemToList(&(records[record_count]), lang);
record_count ++;
return 0;
}
int main(void){
addRecord('l', "torino",1, "it");
addRecord('l', "berlin",20, "de");
addRecord('l', "paris",30, "fr");
addRecord('l', "hamburg",21, "de");
addRecord('l', "sassari",2, "it");
addRecord('l', "cagliari",3, "it");
addRecord('l', "milano",4, "it");
for(int i=0; i< list_count;i++){
printf("lang: %s, count :%d\n", lists[i].lang, lists[i].count);
for (int z = 0; z < lists[i].count; z ++){
printf(" crc: %lu - id: %d \n", lists[i].records[z]->crc, lists[i].records[z]->id);
}
}
return 0;
}
来自Valgrind的输出:
cc -std=c99 -O0 -g tt.c -o tt && valgrind --track-origins=yes ./tt
lang: it, count :4
==17435== Invalid read of size 4
==17435== at 0x400BAC: main (tt.c:92)
==17435== Address 0x51d0050 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
==17435== at 0x4C29097: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525)
==17435== by 0x400990: addRecord (tt.c:65)
==17435== by 0x400A8E: main (tt.c:81)
==17435==
==17435== Invalid read of size 8
==17435== at 0x400BE0: main (tt.c:92)
==17435== Address 0x51d0048 is 8 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
==17435== at 0x4C29097: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:525)
==17435== by 0x400990: addRecord (tt.c:65)
==17435== by 0x400A8E: main (tt.c:81)
==17435==
crc: 10540480176773849829 - id: 1
crc: 5100567372334599520 - id: 2
crc: 16805344662159858020 - id: 3
crc: 16314500525507880138 - id: 4
lang: de, count :2
crc: 3766391767329109829 - id: 20
crc: 12127946872667643737 - id: 21
lang: fr, count :1
crc: 2180538375615994033 - id: 30
答案 0 :(得分:4)
您正在重新分配记录,但不更新指针。
tmp = realloc(records, (record_count + 1) * sizeof(record));
执行此操作时,指向旧records
数组的所有指针都变为无效。
这是一个更简单的例子。
record *array = malloc(sizeof(*array));
record *r1 = &array[0];
array = realloc(array, sizeof(*array) * 2);
record *r2 = &array[1];
// r1 is probably invalid, since 'array' changed
有几种方法可以解决这个问题。
当您realloc
时,请仔细检查并更新所有指针。这真是一种痛苦。
分别对每个记录进行分配,而不是在一个大数组中。 (不,这不会浪费内存。至少没有比较由于字段顺序而浪费的每个记录的8个字节。)
使用索引到记录数组中而不是指向记录的指针。这些不需要更新。