我想做以下事情:
我有一个最初的目标,一个论点作为一种信念,我想扭转它,以便信念的论证成为新的信念,论证成为信仰名称。
这样的事情:
//Agent asker in project Test.mas2j
!translate(barks(dog)). //I would like to have the belief: dog(barks)
+!translate(T)<-
T =.. [A,[B],C];
.print("functor: ",A);
.print("argument: ",B);
//.print("source: ",C);
+B(A);//<- I want something like this, but it gives a syntax error.
+B. //<-this works, but it doesn't give the argument to it
所以,我的问题是,通过这种方式来构建信念?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
像T
一样构建术语:
...
X =.. [B,[A]]; // constructs the belief
+X; // adds the belief to the current belief base
...
从书Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason:
Prolog中也有一个操作员 这里的工作方式略有不同(因为谓词注释不可用) 在Prolog中)是'
=..
',用于将文字解构为列表。所结果的 list的格式为[functor, list of arguments, list of annotations]
,例如:p(b,c)[a1,a2] =.. [p, [b,c], [a1,a2]]
。