是否可以在case类的equals / haschode方法中忽略case类的字段?
我的用例是我有一个字段,它基本上是类中其余数据的元数据。
答案 0 :(得分:80)
只考虑第一个参数部分中的参数是否相等和散列。
scala> case class Foo(a: Int)(b: Int)
defined class Foo
scala> Foo(0)(0) == Foo(0)(1)
res0: Boolean = true
scala> Seq(0, 1).map(Foo(0)(_).hashCode)
res1: Seq[Int] = List(-1669410282, -1669410282)
<强>更新强>
将b
公开为字段:
scala> case class Foo(a: Int)(val b: Int)
defined class Foo
scala> Foo(0)(1).b
res3: Int = 1
答案 1 :(得分:5)
scala> :paste
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
case class Foo private(x: Int, y: Int) {
def fieldToIgnore: Int = 0
}
object Foo {
def apply(x: Int, y: Int, f: Int): Foo = new Foo(x, y) {
override lazy val fieldToIgnore: Int = f
}
}
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
defined class Foo
defined module Foo
scala> val f1 = Foo(2, 3, 11)
f1: Foo = Foo(2,3)
scala> val f2 = Foo(2, 3, 5)
f2: Foo = Foo(2,3)
scala> f1 == f2
res45: Boolean = true
scala> f1.## == f2.##
res46: Boolean = true
如有必要,您可以覆盖.toString
。
答案 2 :(得分:2)
您可以覆盖案例类
中的equals和hashCode方法scala> :paste
// Entering paste mode (ctrl-D to finish)
case class Person( val name:String, val addr:String) {
override def equals( arg:Any) = arg match {
case Person(s, _) => s == name
case _ => false
}
override def hashCode() = name.hashCode
}
// Exiting paste mode, now interpreting.
scala> Person("Andy", "") == Person("Andy", "XXX")
res2: Boolean = true
scala> Person("Andy", "") == Person("Bob", "XXX")
res3: Boolean = false
答案 3 :(得分:0)
如果覆盖基类中的toString
,它将不会被派生的案例类覆盖。这是一个例子:
sealed abstract class C {
val x: Int
override def equals(other: Any) = true
}
case class X(override val x: Int) extends C
case class Y(override val x: Int, y: Int) extends C
比我们测试的那样:
scala> X(3) == X(4)
res2: Boolean = true
scala> X(3) == X(3)
res3: Boolean = true
scala> X(3) == Y(2,5)
res4: Boolean = true