是否可以将Junit规则仅适用于特定测试?如果是这样,我该怎么做?
下面的代码举例说明了我想要做的事情:每次我有@Rule时,我都希望下面的方法能够使用已经注释的特定规则来运行它。我只希望该规则与相应的测试一起运行。我不希望任何其他测试受到规则的影响。
在这种情况下,当我运行这些测试时,我看到其中一个测试是EmptyFileCheck,给出了一个File DNE不存在,但是我为该函数使用了一个单独的注释,所以我原以为它会运行使用不同的上下文,提供Empty,但DNE直到被使用。
import static java.lang.System.in;
import static java.lang.System.setIn;
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
import java.io.BufferedOutputStream;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
import java.io.FileNotFoundException;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.io.PipedInputStream;
import java.io.PipedOutputStream;
import java.io.PrintStream;
import java.nio.channels.Pipe;
import static org.hamcrest.core.AllOf.allOf;
import org.hamcrest.Matcher;
import org.hamcrest.core.AllOf;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.*;
import org.hamcrest.text.StringContains;
import org.hamcrest.text.StringEndsWith;
import org.hamcrest.text.StringStartsWith;
import org.jmock.Expectations;
import org.jmock.Mockery;
import org.jmock.lib.legacy.ClassImposteriser;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.contrib.java.lang.system.TextFromStandardInputStream;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
public class UnitTests {
private Mockery context = new Mockery() {{
setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
}};
private main mn;
private InputStream oldIn;
private PrintStream oldOut;
private InputStream mockIn;
private InputStreamReader mockinputStream;
private PrintStream mockOut;
private BufferedReader reader;
private Expectations exp;
@Before
public void setMinimalMockingExpectations() throws IOException {
exp = new Expectations() {{ }};
mn = context.mock(main.class);
mockinputStream = context.mock(InputStreamReader.class);
oldIn = System.in;
oldOut = System.out;
mockIn = context.mock(InputStream.class);
mockOut = context.mock(PrintStream.class);
System.setOut(mockOut);
}
public void configureExpectations(boolean fileOrInput, boolean verbosity) {
exp.one(mockOut).println("Do you want to process standard (I)nput, or a (F)ile? I/F");
if (fileOrInput) { //it's a file
exp.one(mockOut).println("Enter filename: ");
} else { //it's not
}
}
@After
public void reset() {
System.setOut(oldOut);
}
@Rule
public final TextFromStandardInputStream FileNotFoundException
= new TextFromStandardInputStream("F\nDNE\n");
@Test(expected=FileNotFoundException.class)
public void EnsureFileCheckExists() throws IOException {
final String fileName = "DNE";
configureExpectations(true, false);
exp.one(mn).checkFile(fileName);
context.checking(exp);
mn.main(null);
}
@Rule
public final TextFromStandardInputStream FileReadAccessDenied
= new TextFromStandardInputStream("F\nUnderPriviledged\n");:w
@Test(expected=FileNotFoundException.class)
public void FileReadAccessDenied() throws java.io.FileNotFoundException {
final String fileName = "UnderPriviledged";
configureExpectations(true, false);
//exp.oneOf(mn).checkFile(with()); TODO: fix ME!
context.checking(exp);
mn.main(null);
}
@Rule
public final TextFromStandardInputStream EmptyFileCheck
= new TextFromStandardInputStream("F\nEmpty\n");
@Test
public void EmptyFileCheck() throws java.io.FileNotFoundException {
final String fileName = "Empty";
configureExpectations(true, false);
exp.one(mn).checkFile(fileName);
context.checking(exp);
mn.main(null);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:2)
你的规则中可以有一个setter,这是规则中第一个被调用的东西。这样的事情来自ExpectedException:
// These tests all pass.
public static class HasExpectedException {
@Rule
public ExpectedException thrown= ExpectedException.none();
@Test
public void throwsNothing() {
// no exception expected, none thrown: passes.
}
@Test
public void throwsNullPointerException() {
thrown.expect(NullPointerException.class);
throw new NullPointerException();
}
@Test
public void throwsNullPointerExceptionWithMessage() {
thrown.expect(NullPointerException.class);
thrown.expectMessage("happened?");
thrown.expectMessage(startsWith("What"));
throw new NullPointerException("What happened?");
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
有什么理由不将代码从@rule注释中取出并将其移到测试体的开头?