我在将查询命名为树时遇到问题
WITH UtHierarchy
AS (
SELECT etabid
,ut
,utlib
,parenteut
,0 AS LEVEL
,ut AS root
FROM RUT
WHERE etabid = 1
AND parenteut IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT RUT.etabid
,RUT.ut
,RUT.utlib
,RUT.parenteut
,LEVEL + 1 AS LEVEL
,RUT.parenteut AS root
FROM RUT
INNER JOIN UtHierarchy uh ON uh.ut = rut.parenteut
WHERE RUT.ETABID = 1
)
SELECT *
FROM UtHierarchy
ORDER BY root
我需要以下树:
UT Root UT Root -- UT level 1 UT Root -- UT level 1 -- -- UT level 2 UT Root
这适用于0级或1级,但是对于更高级别,它会被破坏。我尝试在root列中选择'level 0'父级按root和ut排序,但是经过一段时间后我不能:(
如何解决这个问题?
感谢您的帮助。
编辑:感谢您使用sql颜色进行编辑:) 我已经看到了最高级别的解决方案,但用户已删除了他的帖子。
WITH UtHierarchy
AS (
SELECT etabid
,ut
,utlib
,parenteut,
0 as profondeur,
ut as root
FROM RUT
where etabid = 278
and parenteut is null
UNION ALL
SELECT RUT.etabid
, RUT.ut
, RUT.utlib
, RUT.parenteut
, profondeur + 1 as profondeur
, root as root
FROM RUT
inner join UtHierarchy uh on uh.ut = rut.parenteut
where RUT.ETABID = 278
)
select ut, parenteut, profondeur, root
from UtHierarchy
order by root
但它也不起作用
这是一个真实数据的例子
ut parenteutlevel root 10 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 13 1 1 1 14 1 1 1 130 13 2 1 131 13 2 1 132 13 2 1 133 13 2 1 134 13 2 1 135 13 2 1 136 13 2 1 120 12 2 1 121 12 2 1 122 12 2 1 110 11 2 1 111 11 2 1 112 11 2 1 113 11 2 1 114 11 2 1 115 11 2 1 116 11 2 1 101 10 2 1 102 10 2 1 103 10 2 1 104 10 2 1 105 10 2 1 106 10 2 1 107 10 2 1 1 0 1
正如你所看到的,它不是一个好的结构。 我需要一棵树:
ut parenteutlevel root 1 0 1 10 1 1 1 101 10 2 1 102 10 2 1 103 10 2 1 104 10 2 1 105 10 2 1 106 10 2 1 107 10 2 1 11 1 1 1 110 11 2 1 111 11 2 1 112 11 2 1 113 11 2 1 114 11 2 1 115 11 2 1 116 11 2 1 12 1 1 1 120 12 2 1 121 12 2 1 122 12 2 1 13 1 1 1 130 13 2 1 131 13 2 1 132 13 2 1 133 13 2 1 134 13 2 1 135 13 2 1 136 13 2 1 14 1 1 1
答案 0 :(得分:9)
ince Recursive调用是正确的,你的问题在于结果的排序
ORDER BY root
您可以尝试创建排序路径,以帮助按正确的顺序获取它们:
WITH UtHierarchy
AS (
SELECT etabid
,ut
,utlib
,parenteut
,0 AS LEVEL
,ut AS root
,RIGHT('000000' + CAST(ut AS varchar(MAX)), 6) AS sort
FROM RUT
WHERE etabid = 1
AND parenteut IS NULL
UNION ALL
SELECT RUT.etabid
,RUT.ut
,RUT.utlib
,RUT.parenteut
,LEVEL + 1 AS LEVEL
,RUT.parenteut AS root
,uh.sort+'/'+RIGHT('000000' + CAST(RUT.ut AS varchar(20)), 6) AS sort
FROM RUT
INNER JOIN UtHierarchy uh ON uh.ut = rut.parenteut
WHERE RUT.ETABID = 1
)
SELECT *
FROM UtHierarchy
ORDER BY sort
修改强>
CASE => CAST(拼写错误)
编辑2(从测试数据中添加工作示例):
这里有一个复制粘贴测试代码。对我来说很好:
SELECT 10 AS ut, 1 AS parenteut
INTO #RUT
UNION ALL SELECT 11, 1
UNION ALL SELECT 12, 1
UNION ALL SELECT 13, 1
UNION ALL SELECT 14, 1
UNION ALL SELECT 130, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 131, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 132, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 133, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 134, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 135, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 136, 13
UNION ALL SELECT 120, 12
UNION ALL SELECT 121, 12
UNION ALL SELECT 122, 12
UNION ALL SELECT 110, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 111, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 112, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 113, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 114, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 115, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 116, 11
UNION ALL SELECT 101, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 102, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 103, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 104, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 105, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 106, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 107, 10
UNION ALL SELECT 1, 0;
WITH UtHierarchy
AS (
SELECT
ut
,parenteut
,0 AS LEVEL
,ut AS root
,RIGHT('000000' + CAST(ut AS varchar(MAX)), 6) AS sort
FROM #RUT
WHERE
parenteut = 0
UNION ALL
SELECT
RUT.ut
,RUT.parenteut
,LEVEL + 1 AS LEVEL
,RUT.parenteut AS root
,uh.sort+'/'+RIGHT('000000' + CAST(RUT.ut AS varchar(20)), 6) AS sort
FROM #RUT AS RUT
INNER JOIN UtHierarchy uh ON uh.ut = rut.parenteut
)
SELECT *
FROM UtHierarchy
ORDER BY sort
DROP TABLE #RUT;