代码如下
import { Action } from "redux";
import { ActionsObservable, ofType, combineEpics } from 'redux-observable'
import { map } from 'rxjs/operators'
export enum ActionTypes {
One = 'ACTION_ONE',
Two = 'ACTION_TWO'
}
export interface One extends Action {
type: ActionTypes.One
//commnent out next line to remove error
myStr: string
}
export const doOne = (myStr: string): One => ({
type: ActionTypes.One,
//comment out next line to remove error
myStr
})
export interface Two extends Action {
type: ActionTypes.Two
myBool: boolean
}
export const doTwo = (myBool: boolean): Two => ({ type: ActionTypes.Two, myBool })
export type Actions = One | Two
export const epic = (action$: ActionsObservable<Actions>) =>
action$.pipe(
ofType<Actions, One>(ActionTypes.One),
map((action: any) => ({
type: ActionTypes.Two,
myBool: true
}))
)
export const rootEpic = combineEpics(epic)
我也是如何生成商店的
import { createEpicMiddleware } from "redux-observable"
import { createStore, applyMiddleware } from "redux"
import { reducer } from "./reducer"
import { rootEpic } from "./epic"
export const configStore = () => {
const epicMiddleware = createEpicMiddleware()
const store = createStore(reducer, applyMiddleware(epicMiddleware))
epicMiddleware.run(rootEpic)
return store
}
也链接到public git repo。 我花了最后4个小时尝试将有效负载添加到操作中,但是使用每种可能的过滤器解决方案都失败了。 TypeSafe-Actions库也失败。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我和你有同样的问题,我的解决方法是:
严格键入史诗:
export const epic = (action$: ActionsObservable<Actions>)
// Not the subject, but I would prefer
export const epic: Epic<Actions> = action$ =>
您也必须严格键入epicMiddleware:
const epicMiddleware = createEpicMiddleware<Actions>()
使用此方法,您的epicMiddleware.run
方法将尝试Actions
而不是Action<any>
,并且应该可以。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
仅遵循typesafe-action github示例。该存储库确实关心严格输入。可观察到的Redux人们只关心它是否与javascript一起使用。如果它不适用于严格类型的打字稿,那么他们只是忽略了这个问题。并忽略任何请求帮助。幸运的是,typesafe-action示例是使用可观察到的redux构建的,因此对我有用。