我正在尝试为数百万个观察值中的7个以上的变量生成值,当我编写一个for循环来实现此目的时,这将花费很多时间。以下是我要实现的示例。在这种情况下,它是快速的,因为它只有几千个观测值:
# Load dplyr
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(50)
df <- data_frame(SlNo = 1:2000,
Scenario = rep(c(1, 2, 3, 4),500),
A = round(rnorm(2000, 11, 6)),
B = round(rnorm(2000, 15, 4))) %>%
arrange(Scenario)
#splitting data-frame to add multiple rows in the data-frame
df<- df %>% split(f = .$Scenario) %>%
map_dfr(~bind_rows(tibble(Scenario = 0), .x))
#observations for certain variables in the newly added rows have specific values
df <- df %>% mutate(C = if_else(Scenario != 0, 0, 4),
E = if_else(Scenario != 0, 0, 6))
for(i in 2:nrow(df)) {
df$C[i] <- if_else(df$Scenario[i] != 0, (1-0.5) * df$C[i-1] + 3 + 2 + df$B[i] + df$E[i-1],
df$C[i])
df$E[i] <- if_else(df$Scenario[i] != 0, df$C[i] + df$B[i] - 50, df$E[i])
}
df
# A tibble: 2,004 x 6
Scenario SlNo A B C E
<dbl> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
1 0 NA NA NA 4 6
2 1 1 14 19 32 1
3 1 5 1 13 35 -2
4 1 9 17 20 40.5 10.5
5 1 13 8 7 42.8 -0.25
6 1 17 10 16 42.1 8.12
7 1 21 9 12 46.2 8.19
8 1 25 14 18 54.3 22.3
9 1 29 14 15 69.4 34.4
10 1 33 4 17 91.1 58.1
# ... with 1,994 more rows
在处理较大的数据帧时,我想快速产生相似的结果。我对此表示感谢。预先谢谢你!
答案 0 :(得分:2)
在tidyverse
中,您可以像这样使用purrr::accumulate
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(50)
df <- data.frame(SlNo = 1:2000,
Scenario = rep(c(1, 2, 3, 4),500),
A = round(rnorm(2000, 11, 6)),
B = round(rnorm(2000, 15, 4))) %>%
arrange(Scenario)
df %>%
nest(data = B) %>%
group_by(Scenario) %>%
mutate(new = accumulate(data,
.init = tibble(C = 4, E = 6),
~ tibble(C = (1 -0.5)* .x$C + 5 + .y$B + .x$E,
E = 0.5 * .x$C + 5 + .x$E + 2 * .y$B - 50
)
)[-1]
) %>% ungroup %>%
unnest_wider(data) %>%
unnest_wider(new)
#> # A tibble: 2,000 x 6
#> SlNo Scenario A B C E
#> <int> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl> <dbl>
#> 1 1 1 14 19 32 1
#> 2 5 1 1 13 35 -2
#> 3 9 1 17 20 40.5 10.5
#> 4 13 1 8 7 42.8 -0.25
#> 5 17 1 10 16 42.1 8.12
#> 6 21 1 9 12 46.2 8.19
#> 7 25 1 14 18 54.3 22.3
#> 8 29 1 14 15 69.4 34.4
#> 9 33 1 4 17 91.1 58.1
#> 10 37 1 13 15 124. 88.7
#> # ... with 1,990 more rows
由 reprex package (v2.0.0) 于 2021 年 7 月 5 日创建
答案 1 :(得分:1)
如果您不想转换到 data.table
或 dtplyr
,这在弄清楚如何使 cumsum
和 lag
适应您需要的输出时可能会很棘手,您可以调整循环以并行运行,这里是代码示例:
#install.packages("foreach")
#install.packages("doParallel")
# Loading libraries
library(foreach)
library(doParallel)
library(tidyverse)
set.seed(50)
df <- data_frame(SlNo = 1:2000,
Scenario = rep(c(1, 2, 3, 4),500),
A = round(rnorm(2000, 11, 6)),
B = round(rnorm(2000, 15, 4))) %>%
arrange(Scenario)
#splitting data-frame to add multiple rows in the data-frame
df<- df %>% split(f = .$Scenario) %>%
map_dfr(~bind_rows(tibble(Scenario = 0), .x))
#observations for certain variables in the newly added rows have specific values
df <- df %>% mutate(C = if_else(Scenario != 0, 0, 4),
E = if_else(Scenario != 0, 0, 6))
# Setting up the cores
n.cores <- parallel::detectCores() - 1
my.cluster <- parallel::makeCluster(
n.cores,
type = "PSOCK",
.packages="dplyr"
)
doParallel::registerDoParallel(cl = my.cluster)
# Run the foreach loop in parallel
foreach(
i = 2:nrow(df2),
.combine = 'rbind'
) %dopar% {
df$C[i] <- if_else(df$Scenario[i] != 0, (1-0.5) * df$C[i-1] + 3 + 2 + df$B[i] + df$E[i-1],
df$C[i])
df$E[i] <- if_else(df$Scenario[i] != 0, df$C[i] + df$B[i] - 50, df$E[i])
}
df
# stop the cluster
parallel::stopCluster(cl = my.cluster)
这应该会显着加快您的代码速度。然而,并行的时间执行差异在较大的数据集上并不明显,对于较小的数据集,它实际上可能需要更多的时间来执行。