我在一个组件中构建了一个非常复杂的列表,它们都以相同的方式进行查询。当我到达列表末尾时,我将提取限制提高了10 ...一切都进行得很顺利,直到我意识到我要重新加载所有数据(而不仅仅是新的10)。我想避免所有这些读取操作以降低成本-我不确定firebase是否会忽略已加载的数据...每次获取额外的10条数据时,我的列表运行得很顺利,但我不知道幕后的事情会再次困扰我!
更新
我已经根据一些有用的反馈更新了我的代码,并且我认为我的工作应该如何进行。我只关心一件事。第一次获取后到达列表底部时,我会将所有先前的数据传递给动作创建者,然后将其隐藏为新的获取的数据。每当列表增加时,每次我触底时都会重复一次。我的列表将有1000多个记录,所以我担心潜在的性能问题,应该吗?在下面看看我的新尝试!
原始尝试:
onEndReached = () => {
const { searchFilterText, effectVal } = this.state;
this.setState({
strainFetchIndex: this.state.strainFetchIndex + 10
}, () => {
const offset = this.state.strainFetchIndex;
if (searchFilterText === '') {
this.props.strainsFetch(offset);
} else if (searchFilterText === 'Hybrid' || searchFilterText === 'Salt' || searchFilterText === 'Initial') {
this.props.filterStrainAction(searchFilterText, offset);
} else if (searchFilterText === 'Effects') {
this.props.filterByEffect(effectVal, offset);
}
});
}
//HERES 1 of 4 ACTION CREATORS WHERE I FETCH MORE DATA (ALL ARE SIMILAR)
export const strainsFetch = (offset) => {
const ting = offset || 1;
return (dispatch) => {
firebase.database().ref('/strains')
.orderByKey()
.limitToFirst(1 * ting)
.on('value', snapshot => {
dispatch({ type: STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS, payload: snapshot.val() });
});
};
};
新尝试:
onEndReached = () => {
const { searchFilterText } = this.state;
const { lastKey } = this.props;
const currentStrains = this.props.strains;
if (this.state.filterLabel === 'Favourites') {
return null;
}
if (searchFilterText === '') {
//here I pass all previous records along with the last key (last key comes from my action creator)
this.props.strainsFetch(currentStrains, lastKey);
}
}
//ACTION CREATOR
export const strainsFetch = (currentStrains, lastKey) => {
if (!lastKey) {
return (dispatch) => {
// console.log('first Fetch');
firebase.database().ref('/strains')
.orderByKey()
.limitToFirst(10)
.on('value', snapshot => {
const snap = snapshot.val();
const snapKeys = Object.keys(snap);
const createLastKey = snapKeys[9];
dispatch({ type: STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS, payload: snapshot.val(), key: createLastKey });
});
};
}
return (dispatch) => {
// console.log('subsequent Fetch');
firebase.database().ref('/strains')
.orderByKey()
.startAt(`${lastKey}`)
.limitToFirst(11)
.on('value', snapshot => {
const snap = snapshot.val();
const snapKeys = Object.keys(snap)
.slice(1);
const results = snapKeys
.map((key) => snapshot.val()[key]);
const createLastKey = snapKeys[snapKeys.length - 1];
const concatStrains = _.concat(currentStrains, results);
dispatch({ type: STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS, payload: concatStrains, key: createLastKey });
});
};
};
//HERE IS WHAT MY REDUCER LOOKS LIKE
import {
STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS
} from '../actions/types';
const INITIAL_STATE = {};
export default (state = INITIAL_STATE, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS:
// console.log(action.payload);
return { strains: action.payload, lastKey: action.key };
default:
return state;
}
};
随着列表不断增长,一遍又一遍地反复将以前的数据传递给我的动作创建者,这是一种错误的做法吗?还是有一种更有效的方法来完成此任务?
谢谢大家!
干杯。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您是正确的,因为您要重新加载除旧版本之外的所有旧版本。如果只想加载新的,则应使用.startAt()
方法,签出relevant docs here。
您的最终设置将类似于:
export const strainsFetch = (offset) => {
const startingIndex = offset || 1;
const numRecordsToLoad = 10;
return (dispatch) => {
firebase.database().ref('/strains')
.orderByKey()
.startAt(startingIndex)
.limitToFirst(numRecordsToLoad)
.on('value', snapshot => {
dispatch({ type: STRAINS_FETCH_SUCCESS, payload: snapshot.val() });
});
};
};