我有班主任
public Person() {
//passports = new AutoPopulatingList<Passport>(Passport.class);
passports = new AutoPopulatingList<Passport>(new PassportFactory(this));
}
@Id
@Column(name = "PERSON_ID")
@GeneratedValue
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
@Column(name = "FIRST_NAME")
public String getFirstName() {
return firstName;
}
@Column(name = "LAST_NAME")
public String getLastName() {
return lastName;
}
@Column(name = "MONEY")
public Double getMoney() {
return money;
}
@OneToMany(cascade = CascadeType.ALL, fetch=FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy="person")
@JoinColumn(name="person_id")
public List<Passport> getPassports(){
return this.passports;
}
班级护照
@Id
@Column(name = "passport_id")
@GeneratedValue
public Integer getPassport_id() {
return passport_id;
}
@Column(name = "country_issue")
public String getCountry_issue() {
return country_issue;
}
@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
@JoinColumn(name="person_id")
public Person getPerson(){
return person;
}
这是双向的关系。
最初我像这样保存
session.save(person);
并没有将person_id保存在护照表中,然后有人告诉我这样做
for(Passport passport : person.getPassports())
{
passport.setPerson(person);
}
session.save(person);
这样做有用!!。
我的问题是,如果我使用ElementFactory并使用
在护照中设置person对象public Object createElement(int index) {
Passport passport = new Passport();
passport.setPerson(person);
return passport;
那为什么我必须再次明确地设置这个人
这是我在autopopulateList中使用的Passportfactory类
public class PassportFactory implements AutoPopulatingList.ElementFactory {
private Person person;
public PassportFactory(Person person) {
this.person = person;
}
public Object createElement(int index) {
Passport passport = new Passport();
passport.setPerson(person);
return passport;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
是的,双向关联由用户手动处理(就像你展示的那样)