如何将带有查询的字符串转换为实际的LINQ表达式,以便执行它?
if(email!= null)
{
query += "x => x.Email.Contains(email)";
}
if (firstname != null)
{
query += "&& x.FirstName.Contains(firstname)";
}
if (lastname != null)
{
query += "&& x.LastName.Contains(lastname)";
}
return context.UserAccounts.Where(query).ToList();
答案 0 :(得分:2)
尝试一下:
<your collection>.
.Where(o => (email!= null)? o.Email.Contains(email) : true).
.Where(o => (firstname != null)? o.FirstName.Contains(firstname) : true).
.Where(o => (lastname != null)? o.LastName.Contains(lastname) : true).
ToList();
基本上,这意味着过滤器仅在满足条件时才适用(就像if语句中一样)。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
您可以将查询另存为IQueryable
(来自System.Linq
名称空间),而不是将查询另存为字符串。
var query = context.UserAccounts;
if(email!= null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.Email.Contains(email));
}
if (firstname != null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.FirstName.Contains(firstname));
}
if (lastname != null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.LastName.Contains(lastname));
}
return query.toList();
当您最终致电ToList()
时,IQueryable
被枚举为List
中的UserAccount
。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
如果需要使用where子句的组合进行查询,则每次结果都需要保存在查询本身中
var query = context.UserAccounts;
if(email != null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.Email.Contains(email));
}
if (firstname != null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.FirstName.Contains(firstname));
}
if (lastname != null))
{
query = query.Where(x => x.LastName.Contains(lastname));
}
return query.ToList();
另一种复杂的方法可能是使用Actions
答案 3 :(得分:-2)
也许我没有正确看到您的问题,所以如果我错了,请原谅。 为什么可以将字符串转换为LINQ表达式:
var query = context.UserAccounts;
if(email != null)
{
query = query.Where(x => x.Email.Contains(email));
}
if (firstname != null)
{
query = query.Where(x.FirstName.Contains(firstname));
}
if (lastname != null))
{
query = query.Where(x.LastName.Contains(lastname));
}
return query.toList();