我正在研究Python的源代码,因此决定对语法进行一些更改,因此我下载了3.7版的源代码。
我正在遵循PEP 0306的准则:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0306/
以Hackernoon为例:
https://hackernoon.com/modifying-the-python-language-in-7-minutes-b94b0a99ce14
这个想法来自装饰器语法的改进(记住,这只是一个研究的例子,我已经知道有其他方法可以做同样的事情):
@test
def mydef (self):
pass
按照语法/语法文件的行,它工作得很好:
decorated: decorators (classdef | funcdef | async_funcdef)
现在的目标是从示例开始,将装饰器更改为接受声明:
@test
id: int = 1
分析语法,我发现了annassign,它是:
annassign: ':' test ['=' test]
# or even use small_stmt
鉴于表示 id:int = 1 的令牌,我将令牌更改为:
decorated: decorators (classdef | funcdef | async_funcdef | annassign)
做到这一点(在PEP 0306之后),我去了 ast.c 并确定了 ast_for_decorated 方法,并获得了这段代码:
[...]
assert(TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef);
if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef) {
thing = ast_for_classdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_async_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
}
[...]
您可以验证是否存在下一个令牌(函数,类或异步)的验证,然后调用负责的方法(ast_for)。 所以我根据ast.c进行了更改:
[...]
assert(TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == annassign ||
TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef);
if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == annassign) {
thing = ast_for_annassign(c, CHILD(n, 1));
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == classdef) {
thing = ast_for_classdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
} else if (TYPE(CHILD(n, 1)) == async_funcdef) {
thing = ast_for_async_funcdef(c, CHILD(n, 1), decorator_seq);
}
[...]
请注意,我创建了 ast_for_annassign 方法,该方法包含与 ast_for_expr_stmt 中存在的验证代码相同的验证代码:
static stmt_ty
ast_for_annassign(struct compiling *c, const node *n)
{
REQ(n, expr_stmt);
expr_ty expr1, expr2, expr3;
node *ch = CHILD(n, 0);
node *deep, *ann = CHILD(n, 1);
int simple = 1;
/* we keep track of parens to qualify (x) as expression not name */
deep = ch;
while (NCH(deep) == 1) {
deep = CHILD(deep, 0);
}
if (NCH(deep) > 0 && TYPE(CHILD(deep, 0)) == LPAR) {
simple = 0;
}
expr1 = ast_for_testlist(c, ch);
if (!expr1) {
return NULL;
}
switch (expr1->kind) {
case Name_kind:
if (forbidden_name(c, expr1->v.Name.id, n, 0)) {
return NULL;
}
expr1->v.Name.ctx = Store;
break;
case Attribute_kind:
if (forbidden_name(c, expr1->v.Attribute.attr, n, 1)) {
return NULL;
}
expr1->v.Attribute.ctx = Store;
break;
case Subscript_kind:
expr1->v.Subscript.ctx = Store;
break;
case List_kind:
ast_error(c, ch,
"only single target (not list) can be annotated");
return NULL;
case Tuple_kind:
ast_error(c, ch,
"only single target (not tuple) can be annotated");
return NULL;
default:
ast_error(c, ch,
"illegal target for annotation");
return NULL;
}
if (expr1->kind != Name_kind) {
simple = 0;
}
ch = CHILD(ann, 1);
expr2 = ast_for_expr(c, ch);
if (!expr2) {
return NULL;
}
if (NCH(ann) == 2) {
return AnnAssign(expr1, expr2, NULL, simple,
LINENO(n), n->n_col_offset, c->c_arena);
}
else {
ch = CHILD(ann, 3);
expr3 = ast_for_expr(c, ch);
if (!expr3) {
return NULL;
}
return AnnAssign(expr1, expr2, expr3, simple,
LINENO(n), n->n_col_offset, c->c_arena);
}
}
现在是时候进行测试(配置/ make -j / make install),python3.7和:
File "__init__.py", line 13
id: int = 1
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
在对语法和词法分析器进行了更改之后,编译器是否应该将令牌解释为有效,我在哪里出错?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
id: int = 1
不是annassign
。 : int = 1
部分是annassign
。 (即使行终止符也不算作annassign
的一部分。)Python语法中没有专门用于带注释的赋值语句的非终止符;您可能需要写一个。