以下是要测试的示例类:
public class TestOuterClass {
private final InnerClass innerObj;
boolean status;
Object nullObj = null;
public TestOuterClass(boolean status) {
this.innerObj = new InnerClass();
this.status = status;
}
public class InnerClass {
public boolean doInner() {
return outerMethod();
}
}
public void mockOuterMethod() {
if (innerObj.doInner()) {
return;
}
throw new RuntimeException();
}
boolean outerMethod() {
nullObj.toString();
return status;
}
}
以下是示例测试代码:
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(TestOuterClass.class)
public class TestMockOuterClass {
@Test
public void testMockOuterMethod() {
TestOuterClass outerObj = spy(new TestOuterClass(false));
doReturn(true).when(outerObj).outerMethod();
outerObj.mockOuterMethod();
}
@Test
public void testOuterMethod() {
TestOuterClass outerObj = spy(new TestOuterClass(false));
doReturn(true).when(outerObj).outerMethod();
assertTrue(outerObj.outerMethod());
}
}
请注意,第一个测试失败,并带有以下异常堆栈,第二个测试成功:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass.outerMethod(TestOuterClass.java:31)
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass$InnerClass.doInner(TestOuterClass.java:19)
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass.mockOuterMethod(TestOuterClass.java:24)
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestMockOuterClass.testMockOuterMethod(TestMockOuterClass.java:22)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:68)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:316)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:89)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:97)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:300)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:131)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.access$100(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:59)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner$TestExecutorStatement.evaluate(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.evaluateStatement(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:107)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit47MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit47RunnerDelegateImpl.java:82)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:288)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:87)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:50)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:208)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:147)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:121)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:123)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:121)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:53)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:51)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:242)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70)
当我为类TestOuterClass
创建一个间谍对象并直接模拟并测试outerMethod
时,它似乎起作用了。但是,从outerMethod
方法触发InnerClass.doInner()
时,模拟无法正常工作。建议修复第一个测试的方法是什么?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
让我们逐点讲解此示例。
在测试案例中,您围绕TestOuterClass
的实例创建了一个间谍。在创建实例时(在构造函数中),您将创建InnerClass
对象作为其字段。
现在,您可以模拟outerMethod
的行为以使其始终返回true
。
现在,调用outerObj.mockOuterMethod()
时会发生的是正在调用 real 方法,因为它没有被模拟。您可以在提供的堆栈跟踪中看到它:
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass.outerMethod(TestOuterClass.java:31)
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass$InnerClass.doInner(TestOuterClass.java:19)
at org.apache.samza.runtime.TestOuterClass.mockOuterMethod(TestOuterClass.java:24)
稍后,它只是继续调用真实的doInner
方法-此处可能会令人困惑-真实的outerMethod
。
您可能会说:“嘿,我嘲笑那件事”。但是您会看到-通过这种方法:
public boolean doInner() {
return outerMethod();
}
您实际上是在指this.outherMethod()
。问题是,从InnerClass
的角度来看,this
指的是实际的TestOuterClass
实例-不是间谍。
创建实例的间谍时,正在创建一种代理。当您调用一个被模拟的方法时,那么甚至都不会达到真实的对象。 但是,当您调用未模拟的方法时,它将“代理”对实际对象的调用。
所以您的问题是:如何解决?
您可以添加另一个TestOuterClass
构造函数,而不是创建InnerClass实例,而是将其注入:
public TestOuterClass(boolean status, InnerClass innerObj) {
this.innerObj = innerObj;
this.status = status;
}
然后,您可以在测试中创建将InnerClass
的模拟传递给构造函数:
TestOuterClass.InnerClass innerObjMock = Mockito.mock(TestOuterClass.InnerClass.class);
TestOuterClass outerObj = spy(new TestOuterClass(false, innerObjMock));
通过此设置,您可以模拟innerObjMock
的行为。
如果这不是您想要的东西,请告诉我。