当我在mac上使用icc编译器时,我无法与其他编译器(例如gcc,clang)获得相同的答案。 使用icc编译器,结果低于
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
0.000000e+00
预期答案在这里
1.000000e+00
2.000000e+00
3.000000e+00
4.000000e+00
2.500000e+01
3.000000e+01
3.500000e+01
4.000000e+01
我这样编译:
icc test1.c -fopenmp -mavx -Wall
gcc test1.c -fopenmp -mavx -Wall
clang test1.c -fopenmp -mavx -Wall
我的代码如下:
#include "stdio.h"
#include "time.h"
#include "math.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "omp.h"
#include "x86intrin.h"
void dd_m_dd(double *ahi, double *bhi, double *chi, int m, int n)
{
int j;
#pragma omp parallel
{
__m256d vahi,vbhi,vchi;
#pragma omp for private(vahi,vbhi,vchi)
for (j = 0; j < m*n; j+=4) {
vbhi = _mm256_broadcast_sd(&bhi[j]);
vahi = _mm256_load_pd(&ahi[j]);
vchi = _mm256_load_pd(&chi[j]);
vchi=vahi*vbhi;
chi[j]=vchi[0];
chi[j+1]=vchi[1];
chi[j+2]=vchi[2];
chi[j+3]=vchi[3];
}
}
}
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]){
// Matrix Vector Product with DD
// set variables
int m;
double* xhi;
double* yhi;
double* z;
int i;
m=(int)pow(2,3);
// main program
// set vector or matrix
xhi=(double *)malloc(sizeof(double) * m*1);
yhi=(double *)malloc(sizeof(double) * m*1);
z=(double *)malloc(sizeof(double) * m*1);
//preset
for (i=0;i<m;i++) {
xhi[i]=i+1;
yhi[i]=i+1;
z[i]=0;
}
dd_m_dd(xhi,yhi,z,m,1);
for (i=0;i<m;i++) {
printf("%e\n",z[i]);
}
free(xhi);
free(yhi);
free(z);
return 0;
}
这里发生了什么?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我不习惯引导内在函数,但这对我来说非常可疑:
chi[j]=vchi[0];
chi[j+1]=vchi[1];
chi[j+2]=vchi[2];
chi[j+3]=vchi[3];
事实上,将其替换为看起来非常像工作的正确功能,即_mm256_store_pd()
似乎正在解决问题。
您的功能现在看起来像这样(还有一些风格修复)
void dd_m_dd(double *ahi, double *bhi, double *chi, int m, int n) {
#pragma omp parallel for
for (int j = 0; j < m*n; j+=4) {
__m256d vbhi = _mm256_broadcast_sd(&bhi[j]);
__m256d vahi = _mm256_load_pd(&ahi[j]);
__m256d vchi=vahi*vbhi;
_mm256_store_pd( &chi[j], vchi );
}
}
另一个问题是你没有强制执行指针的正确对齐......重写这样的分配只是修复了它:
double *xhi=(double *)aligned_alloc(256, sizeof(double) * m*1);
double *yhi=(double *)aligned_alloc(256, sizeof(double) * m*1);
double *z=(double *)aligned_alloc(256, sizeof(double) * m*1);