在Express JS应用程序中实现基于Socket.io的通知系统时,我发现当用户在站点周围导航时,通过控制器加载下一页,在上一页的websocket disconnect事件之前进入。
这令人沮丧,因为我正在映射用户到套接字,并且在页面加载周期期间,任何新消息都会被发送到旧套接字。
如果没有活动连接,我会检查消息,然后在连接时将其刷新到客户端,或者稍后按需将其刷新。在第二页/第三页控制器处理期间(当然甚至在页面被发送之前),这个过程被欺骗认为前一页的连接仍然是活动的。理想情况下,我希望套接字被拆除,因此我可以在控制器运行之前删除映射条目。
虽然我的应用程序太复杂而无法在此处发布,但我在Socket.io示例应用程序中轻松地重现了该问题。
当在两个页面之间单击并再次返回时,会产生以下跟踪:
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
connection VlPV3nIQHFuzGUXKAAAU
Page 2 controller
Page 2 done
disconnecting VlPV3nIQHFuzGUXKAAAU transport close
disconnect VlPV3nIQHFuzGUXKAAAU transport close
connection Xr7l-6TSv4VpWibXAAAV
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
disconnecting Xr7l-6TSv4VpWibXAAAV transport close
disconnect Xr7l-6TSv4VpWibXAAAV transport close
connection WcmYeaOnpmzYG3_qAAAW
正如您所看到的,在页面完成渲染后,将完成前一个套接字的断开连接。
服务器是此https://github.com/socketio/chat-example的略微修改版本。我刚刚添加了事件记录和第二页来替换。
var app = require('express')();
var http = require('http').Server(app);
var io = require('socket.io')(http);
var port = process.env.PORT || 3000;
app.get('/', function(req, res){
console.log('Page 1 controller');
res.sendFile(__dirname + '/index.html');
console.log('Page 1 done');
});
app.get('/2', function(req, res){
console.log('Page 2 controller');
res.sendFile(__dirname + '/index.html');
console.log('Page 2 done');
});
io.on('connection', function(socket){
console.log('connection ', socket.id);
socket.on('chat message', function(msg){
console.log('received ', msg);
io.emit('chat message', msg);
});
socket.on('disconnecting', function(reason){
console.log('disconnecting', socket.id, reason);
});
socket.on('disconnect', function(reason){
console.log('disconnect', socket.id, reason);
});
});
http.listen(port, function(){
console.log('listening on *:' + port);
});
我已经尝试在setImmediate()
中包装控制器,但这并没有延迟它。
我猜测Chrome在拆除旧页面之前正在做一些“聪明”的预取,或者套接字稍微挥之不去。
如何在控制器命中之前获得断开连接?
编辑:在Safari中尝试它可以得到相同的结果,但由于它在地址栏中预取网站这一事实很复杂,因此您可以获得重复的连接。
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
connection 77rWBC3fx_VrVGSsAAAj
disconnecting 77rWBC3fx_VrVGSsAAAj transport close
disconnect 77rWBC3fx_VrVGSsAAAj transport close
Page 2 controller
Page 2 done
connection ExZeKTiG1wRix7pxAAAk
disconnecting ExZeKTiG1wRix7pxAAAk transport close
disconnect ExZeKTiG1wRix7pxAAAk transport close
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
connection 0Xtkd5lYCyHDumHTAAAl
disconnecting 0Xtkd5lYCyHDumHTAAAl transport error
disconnect 0Xtkd5lYCyHDumHTAAAl transport error
Page 2 controller
Page 2 done
connection 0x7aV1ttnG6NT9_pAAAm
Page 2 controller
Page 2 done
disconnecting bxzFSDWGNDfEpw5MAAAi transport close
disconnect bxzFSDWGNDfEpw5MAAAi transport close
connection l09oRFBX0-XZp658AAAn
disconnecting 0x7aV1ttnG6NT9_pAAAm transport close
disconnect 0x7aV1ttnG6NT9_pAAAm transport close
最后一个似乎是预取的。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我尝试使用window.onunload
事件来查看是否更早,但事实并非如此。然后我注意到window.onbeforeload
事件,并且在下一页加载之前确实发生了事件:
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
connection RZJ0RpDdIRM9JwcHAAAI
window_beforeunload RZJ0RpDdIRM9JwcHAAAI
Page 2 controller
Page 2 done
window_unload RZJ0RpDdIRM9JwcHAAAI
disconnecting RZJ0RpDdIRM9JwcHAAAI transport close
disconnect RZJ0RpDdIRM9JwcHAAAI transport close
connection 5wU3WklUptDVm7HHAAAJ
window_beforeunload 5wU3WklUptDVm7HHAAAJ
Page 1 controller
Page 1 done
window_unload 5wU3WklUptDVm7HHAAAJ
disconnecting 5wU3WklUptDVm7HHAAAJ transport close
disconnect 5wU3WklUptDVm7HHAAAJ transport close
connection VOywtaf_4nAipPpvAAAK
通过这个经过修改的客户:
window.onbeforeunload = function(){
socket.emit('window_beforeunload');
};
window.onunload = function(){
socket.emit('window_unload');
};
这个修改过的服务器:
io.on('connection', function(socket){
...
socket.on('window_beforeunload', function(){
console.log('window_beforeunload', socket.id);
});
socket.on('window_unload', function(){
console.log('window_unload', socket.id );
});
});