我正在查看传单js代码。有一个wrapNum函数。
// @function wrapNum(num: Number, range: Number[], includeMax?: Boolean): Number
// Returns the number `num` modulo `range` in such a way so it lies within
// `range[0]` and `range[1]`. The returned value will be always smaller than
// `range[1]` unless `includeMax` is set to `true`.
function wrapNum(x, range, includeMax) {
var max = range[1],
min = range[0],
d = max - min;
return x === max && includeMax ? x : ((x - min) % d + d) % d + min;
}
因此,他们只是试图找到一个模数范围,以便数字位于给定的最小 - 最大范围之间。
如果我写((x - min) % d + d) % d + min
,而不是使用((x - min) % d) + min
表达式,是否会错过原始表达式涵盖的任何测试用例?
答案 0 :(得分:2)
...是否会错过原始表达所涵盖的任何测试用例?
是。对于 x 的大多数值,您将获得小于最小范围范围[0] 的错误值。
这是因为%
multiplicative operator返回一个余数,而不是一个正确的模数,例如:
-1 % 12
返回-1而不是1(见JavaScript % (modulo) gives a negative result for negative numbers),因此使用了复杂的:
((x - min) % d + d) % d
获取正确的模数值。一些播放代码:
function wrapNum0(x, range, includeMax) {
var max = range[1],
min = range[0],
d = max - min;
return x === max && includeMax ? x : ((x - min) % d + d) % d + min;
}
function wrapNum1(x, range, includeMax) {
var max = range[1],
min = range[0],
d = max - min;
return x === max && includeMax ? x : ((x - min) % d) + min;
}
function doCalc(form) {
var num = +form.num.value;
var range = form.range.value.split(',').map(Number);
var includeMax = form.includeMax.checked;
form.result0.value = wrapNum0(num, range, includeMax);
form.result1.value = wrapNum1(num, range, includeMax);
}

<form onsubmit="event.preventDefault();doCalc(this); return false;">
<input value="3" name="num">Value<br>
<input value="5,10" name="range">Range (<em>min,max</em>)<br>
<input type="checkbox" name="includeMax">Inclue max?<br>
<input readonly name="result0">Original (wrapNum0)<br>
<input readonly name="result1">Modified (wrapNum1)<br>
<input type="reset"><button>Do calc</button>
</form>
&#13;