我正在处理一些Clojure代码,其中我有一个实体树,表示为嵌套向量,如下所示:
(def tree '[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 {:k1 [SYMB1 "b" "c"]} "x"] {:k2 ["b" "c"]})
这里,叶子是字符串,节点可以是符号或映射。每张地图都有一个与子树或一组树叶相关联的关键字。
如何渲染上面的树以获得:
[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 [SYMB1 "b" "c"] "x"] "b" "c"]
答案 0 :(得分:1)
看起来你只想在遇到地图时丢弃:k1
和:k2
(假设每张地图只有1个键)。您可以使用postwalk
(ns ...
(:require
[clojure.walk :as walk]
))
(def tree
'[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 {k1 [SYMB1 "b" "c"]} "x"] {k2 ["b" "c"]} ])
(def desired
'[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 [SYMB1 "b" "c"] "x"] ["b" "c"]])
(let [result (walk/postwalk
(fn [item]
(cond
(map? item) (do
(when-not (= 1 (count item))
(throw (ex-info "Must be only 1 item" {:item item})))
(val (first item)))
:else item ))
tree) ]
(is= desired result))
result => [SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 [SYMB1 "b" "c"] "x"] ["b" "c"]]
请注意,:k2
的结果仍然包含在矢量中,与原始问题不同。我不确定这是不是你的意思。
答案 1 :(得分:1)
使用clojure.spec:
(ns tree
(:require [clojure.spec.alpha :as s]))
(def tree '[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 {:k1 [SYMB1 "b" "c"]} "x"] {:k2 ["b" "c"]}])
(s/def ::leaf string?)
(s/def ::leafs (s/coll-of ::leaf))
(s/def ::map
(s/and
map?
(s/conformer
(fn [m]
(let [[_ v] (first m)]
(s/conform (s/or
:node ::node
:leafs ::leafs) v))))))
(s/def ::node (s/and
(s/or :symbol ::symbol
:leaf ::leaf
:map ::map)
(s/conformer second)))
(s/def ::symbol
(s/and
(s/cat :name
symbol?
:children
(s/* ::node))
(s/conformer (fn [parsed]
(let [{:keys [name children]} parsed]
(reduce
(fn [acc v]
(case (first v)
:leafs (into acc (second v))
:node (conj acc (second v))
(conj acc v)))
[name]
children))))))
(s/conform ::node tree) ;; [SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 [SYMB1 "b" "c"] "x"] "b" "c"]
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我找到了一个使用postwak和一些辅助函数的解决方案:
(defn clause-coll? [item]
(and (vector? item)
(symbol? (first item))))
(defn render-map[amap]
(let [[[_ v]] (vec amap)]
(if (clause-coll? v)
[v]
v)))
(defn render-item[item]
(if (map? item)
(render-map item)
[item]))
(defn render-level [[op & etc]]
(->> (mapcat render-item etc)
(cons op)))
(defn parse-tree[form]
(clojure.walk/postwalk #(if (clause-coll? %)
(render-level %)
%)
form))
答案 3 :(得分:0)
Michiel的clojure.spec解决方案很聪明,而Alan的clojure.walk解决方案很简洁。
不使用任何库并直接走树:
(def tree
'[SYMB1 "a"
[SYMB2 {:k1 [SYMB1 "b" "c"]}
"x"]
{:k2 ["b" "c"]}])
(defn get-new-keys
"Determines next keys vector for tree navigation, can backtrack."
[source-tree current-keys current-node]
(if (and (vector? current-node) (symbol? (first current-node)))
(conj current-keys 0)
(let [last-index (->> current-keys count dec)]
(let [forward-keys (update-in current-keys [last-index] inc)
forward-node (get-in source-tree forward-keys)]
(if forward-node
forward-keys
(if (= 1 (count current-keys))
current-keys
(recur source-tree (subvec current-keys 0 last-index) current-node)))))))
(defn convert-tree
"Converts nested vector source tree to target tree."
([source-tree] (convert-tree source-tree [0] []))
([source-tree keys target-tree]
(let [init-node (get-in source-tree keys)
node (if (map? init-node)
(first (vals init-node))
(if (vector? init-node)
[]
init-node))
new-target-tree (update-in target-tree keys (constantly node))
new-keys (get-new-keys source-tree keys init-node)]
(if (= new-keys keys)
new-target-tree
(recur source-tree new-keys new-target-tree)))))
user=> (convert-tree tree)
[SYMB1 "a" [SYMB2 [SYMB1 "b" "c"] "x"] ["b" "c"]]