有没有办法在连接点周围的AOP之前进行一次性处理,以使我的方面更具性能?

时间:2017-11-22 18:31:39

标签: java spring annotations aop spring-aop

我有一个带@Traceable实现的自定义TraceAspect注释。我们对要在方法调用之前和之后记录的方法使用@Traceable注释。我们刚刚添加了通过value中的@Traceable属性指定要使用的日志级别的功能(旧版本始终只使用INFO)。我有什么作品,但我想知道是否有办法让它更高效。具体来说,如果存在某种方面背景,则可以在应用启动时检查给定方法的value @Traceable设置。

@Traceable注释:

@Documented
@Retention(RUNTIME)
@Target(METHOD)
public @interface Traceable {

    Level value() default Level.INFO;
}

当前TraceAspect impl:

import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around;
import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect;
import org.aspectj.lang.reflect.MethodSignature;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import org.slf4j.event.Level;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;

@Component
@Aspect
public class TraceAspect {

    @Around("@annotation(com.collaterate.logging.Traceable)")
    public Object traceAround(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
        Traceable traceable = ((MethodSignature) joinPoint.getSignature()).getMethod().getAnnotation(Traceable.class);
        Logger classLog = LoggerFactory.getLogger(joinPoint.getSignature().getDeclaringType());
        LoggingHelper loggingHelper = getLoggingHelper(traceable, classLog);

        String methodName = joinPoint.getSignature().getName();
        loggingHelper.log("{}() - started", methodName);
        Object returnVal = joinPoint.proceed();
        loggingHelper.log("{}() - ended", methodName);

        return returnVal;
    }

    private LoggingHelper getLoggingHelper(Traceable traceable, Logger classLog) {
        if (Level.INFO == traceable.value() || null == traceable.value()) {
            // try to avoid the switch below... most of the time it will be INFO
            return (format, args) -> classLog.info(format, args);
        } else {
            switch (traceable.value()) {
                case ERROR :
                    return (format, args) -> classLog.error(format, args);
                case WARN :
                    return (format, args) -> classLog.warn(format, args);
                case DEBUG :
                    return (format, args) -> classLog.debug(format, args);
                case TRACE :
                    return (format, args) -> classLog.trace(format, args);
                default :
                    return (format, args) -> classLog.info(format, args);
            }
        }
    }

    @FunctionalInterface
    interface LoggingHelper {

        void log(String format, Object... args);

    }
}

我唯一的另一个想法是创建多个注释(每个日志级别一个),然后TraceAspect将为每个注释提供一个@Around处理程序,我们避免在运行时进行反射/切换。我不喜欢这个是我们已经在多个项目中使用现有的@Traceable注释遍布生产代码。我想保留1注释并允许它通过属性指定日志级别。

理论上,我想要做的事情应该是可能的,因为创建代理时应用程序启动时会有所有信息。每个带注释的方法都必须有某种上下文。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

我做了类似于指标的事情。您可以使用class and method pair作为维护日志注册表,并将LoggingHelper维护为

如果类方法对在日志注册表中没有条目,请创建日志记录助手并将其存储在注册表中。第二次,你只需在注册表中查找。

注册表是一个自定义的Spring bean,应该自动装入你的方面。

以下是修改后的TraceAspect

的示例
@Component
@Aspect
public class TraceAspect {

    private LogRegistry registry;

    @Autowired
    public TraceAspect(LogRegistry registry) {
        this.registry = registry;
    }

    @Around("@annotation(com.collaterate.logging.Traceable)")
    public Object traceAround(ProceedingJoinPoint joinPoint) throws Throwable {
        String loggerName = joinPoint.getSignature()
           .getDeclaringType().getCanonicalName() + "." 
              + joinPoint.getSignature().getName();

        LoggingHelper loggingHelper = registry.get(loggerName);
        if (loggingHelper == null) {
            Traceable traceable = ((MethodSignature) joinPoint.getSignature()).getMethod().getAnnotation(Traceable.class);
            Logger classLog = LoggerFactory.getLogger(joinPoint.getSignature().getDeclaringType());
            loggingHelper = getLoggingHelper(traceable, classLog);
            registry.put(loggerName, loggingHelper)
        }

        String methodName = joinPoint.getSignature().getName();
        loggingHelper.log("{}() - started", methodName);
        Object returnVal = joinPoint.proceed();
        loggingHelper.log("{}() - ended", methodName);

        return returnVal;
    }
}