我有这个小程序:
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
extern char **environ;
int main()
{
char * const arglist[] = { "/bin/ls", "-l", "/proc/self/maps", NULL };
uid_t uid, euid, suid;
gid_t gid, egid, sgid;
getresuid(&uid, &euid, &suid);
printf("Before: uid: %u, euid: %u, suid: %u\n", uid, euid, suid);
uid = euid;
setresuid(uid, euid, suid);
getresuid(&uid, &euid, &suid);
printf(" After: uid: %u, euid: %u, suid: %u\n", uid, euid, suid);
getresgid(&gid, &egid, &sgid);
printf("Before: gid: %u, egid: %u, sgid: %u\n", gid, egid, sgid);
gid = egid;
setresuid(gid, egid, sgid);
getresuid(&gid, &egid, &sgid);
printf(" After: gid: %u, egid: %u, sgid: %u\n", gid, egid, sgid);
printf("Get result == %d\n", prctl(PR_GET_DUMPABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0));
printf("Set result == %d\n", prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 1, 0, 0, 0));
printf("Get result == %d\n", prctl(PR_GET_DUMPABLE, 0, 0, 0, 0));
if (fork())
{
return 0;
}
execve(arglist[0], arglist, environ);
}
我将此程序编译为名为small-test
的可执行文件,并将其所有权更改为测试用户:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ls -l small-test
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 testing testing 8512 Oct 23 12:55 small-test
然后我运行程序:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ./small-test
Before: uid: 1001, euid: 1001, suid: 1001
After: uid: 1001, euid: 1001, suid: 1001
Before: gid: 1001, egid: 1001, sgid: 1001
After: gid: 1001, egid: 1001, sgid: 1001
Get result == 1
Set result == 0
Get result == 1
-r--r--r--. 1 hopper hopper 0 Oct 23 14:50 /proc/self/maps
到目前为止,这么好。然后我这样做:
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ sudo chmod ug+s ./small-test
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ls -l ./small-test
-rwsrwsr-x. 1 testing testing 8512 Oct 23 12:55 ./small-test
[omnifarious@foohost ~]$ ./small-test
Before: uid: 1001, euid: 1002, suid: 1002
After: uid: 1002, euid: 1002, suid: 1002
Before: gid: 1001, egid: 1002, sgid: 1002
After: gid: 1002, egid: 1002, sgid: 1002
Get result == 0
Set result == 0
Get result == 1
-r--r--r--. 1 root root 0 Oct 23 12:59 /proc/self/maps
为什么/proc/self/maps
最终归root
而不是testing
或omnifarious
所有?请注意,如果我删除fork
。
令我烦恼的原因是我需要创建一个程序,将自己置于命名空间中,而不是执行它的用户。这样我就无法访问启动该程序的用户拥有的cgroup和其他东西。但我没有被允许写入该程序uid_map
或gid_map
,因此我无法正确设置名称空间。
注意:我编辑了这个问题,包括调用prctl
来设置(和读取)DUMPABLE
标志作为答案(和手册)表示重置这应该将所有者修复为/proc/self/*
个文件。它没有,正如你可以从新程序中看到的那样。
修改:上述程序存在一个错误,即调用setresuid
而不是setresgid
。即使在将调用添加到prctl
之后,这也是导致我的问题的原因。如果流程的真实有效组和用户ID不相同,则prctl(PR_SET_DUMPABLE, 1);
调用无效。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
出于安全原因,任何suid进程都默认拥有root的/proc/self
目录(以防止用户引入核心转储并检查其内存以获取有价值的信息)。
您可以在suid
后设置所有者,方法是使用prctl PR_SET_DUMPABLE
手动使流程转储。
此处为proc(5)
,其中包含对所发生事件以及如何影响该事件的描述:
/proc/[pid]
There is a numerical subdirectory for each running
process; the subdirectory is named by the process
ID.
Each /proc/[pid] subdirectory contains the pseudo-
files and directories described below. These
files are normally owned by the effective user and
effective group ID of the process. However, as a
security measure, the ownership is made root:root
if the process's "dumpable" attribute is set to a
value other than 1. This attribute may change for
the following reasons:
* The attribute was explicitly set via the
prctl(2) PR_SET_DUMPABLE operation.
* The attribute was reset to the value in the
file /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable (described
below), for the reasons described in prctl(2).
Resetting the "dumpable" attribute to 1 reverts
the ownership of the /proc/[pid]/* files to the
process's real UID and real GID.
下面,suid_dumpable
说明了默认值为何的原因:
1 ("debug")
All processes dump core when possible.
(Reasons why a process might nevertheless
not dump core are described in core(5).)
The core dump is owned by the filesystem
user ID of the dumping process and no secu‐
rity is applied. This is intended for sys‐
tem debugging situations only: this mode is
insecure because it allows unprivileged
users to examine the memory contents of
privileged processes.
作为奖励,prctl(2)
列出影响可倾销性的非诱饵情况:
PR_SET_DUMPABLE (since Linux 2.3.20)
(...)
Normally, this flag is set to 1. However, it is
reset to the current value contained in the file
/proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable (which by default has
the value 0), in the following circumstances:
* The process's effective user or group ID is
changed.
* The process's filesystem user or group ID is
changed (see credentials(7)).
* The process executes (execve(2)) a set-user-ID
or set-group-ID program, resulting in a change
of either the effective user ID or the effec‐
tive group ID.
(...)