我之前问过这里的问题: Retaining Data across multiple promise chains
我最终使用T.J. Crowder对我的基本代码的回答并且自那以后做了很多改变。但我注意到节点中有些奇怪的东西,我似乎无法克服。我回到了他提供的基本代码,问题似乎也存在。
以下是示例:
"use strict";
// For tracking our status
class Status {
constructor(total = 0, count = 0) {
this.id = ++Status.id;
this.total = total;
this.count = count;
}
addCall() {
++this.total;
return this;
}
addProgress() {
++this.count;
return this;
}
toString() {
return `[S${this.id}]: Total: ${this.total}, Count: ${this.count}`;
}
}
Status.id = 0;
// The promise subclass
class RepoPromise extends Promise {
constructor(executor) {
super(executor);
this.s = new Status();
}
// Utility method to wrap `then`/`catch` callbacks so we hook into when they're called
_wrapCallbacks(...callbacks) {
return callbacks.filter(c => c).map(c => value => this._handleCallback(c, value));
}
// Utility method for when the callback should be called: We track that we've seen
// the call then execute the callback
_handleCallback(callback, value) {
this.s.addProgress();
console.log("Progress: " + this.s);
return callback(value);
}
// Standard `then`, but overridden so we track what's going on, including copying
// our status object to the new promise before returning it
then(onResolved, onRejected) {
this.s.addCall();
console.log("Added: " + this.s);
const newPromise = super.then(...this._wrapCallbacks(onResolved, onRejected));
newPromise.s = this.s;
return newPromise;
}
// Standard `catch`, doing the same things as `then`
catch(onRejected) {
this.s.addCall();
console.log("Added: " + this.s);
const newPromise = super.catch(...this._wrapCallbacks(onRejected));
newPromise.s = this.s;
return newPromise;
}
}
// Create a promise we'll resolve after a random timeout
function delayedGratification() {
return new Promise(resolve => {
setTimeout(_ => {
resolve();
}, Math.random() * 1000);
});
}
// Run! Note we follow both kinds of paths: Chain and diverge:
const rp = RepoPromise.resolve('Test');
rp.then(function(scope) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
console.log(' Rejected')
reject(scope)
})
})
.catch(e => {console.log('Never Makes it')})
当我使用:node test.js
运行时,我得到以下输出
Added: [S1]: Total: 1, Count: 0
Added: [S1]: Total: 2, Count: 0
Added: [S1]: Total: 3, Count: 0
Progress: [S1]: Total: 3, Count: 1
Rejected
(node:29364) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Unhandled promise rejection (rejection id: 2): Test
(node:29364) [DEP0018] DeprecationWarning: Unhandled promise rejections are deprecated. In the future, promise rejections that are not handled will terminate the Node.js process with a non-zero exit code.
请注意,"never makes it"
的控制台日志不存在,请注意,我已经解决了catch
运行两次的问题,因为它是then(null, function(){})
的简单语法糖,所以你可以忽略那个。
为什么抓不到我想象的工作?当我以正常承诺执行此操作时,没有问题,如下所示。所以我知道_wrapCallbacks
导致问题的事实,我只是不确定原因,或者如何解决它。
const rp = Promise.resolve('Test');
rp.then(function(scope) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
console.log(' Rejected')
reject(scope)
})
})
.catch(e => {console.log('Makes it')})
答案 0 :(得分:1)
catch
实施您的承诺并不起作用。请注意,原生catch
已实施为return this.then(null, callback)
- 调用super.catch
只会直接返回then
实施。
你的then
实现有一个重大错误:它不希望在函数之前获得null
参数。当您执行此操作时,请观察上述呼叫中发生的情况:
_wrapCallbacks(...callbacks) {
return callbacks.filter(c => c).map(…);
// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
}
then(onResolved, onRejected) {
…
const newPromise = super.then(...this._wrapCallbacks(onResolved, onRejected));
…
}
只需从参数数组中删除null
,然后将onrejected
回调作为onfulfilled
传递。您将要删除filter
并在映射函数中使用三元组:
_wrapCallbacks(...callbacks) {
return callbacks.map(c => typeof c == "function"
? value => this._handleCallback(c, value)
: c);
}
您也可以放弃被覆盖的catch
。