假设我有以下TestCase
class TestSomething(unittest.TestCase):
def test_a(self):
# Do some testing
def test_b(self):
# Do some other testing
如果我参考该测试,是否可以运行TestSomething.test_a
?我期待的是:
def run_test(test):
# Somehow runs the test
# HERE IS THE PART I AM REALLY STUCK ON
run_test(TestSomething.test_a)
我知道对于正常的单元测试来说这是一件尴尬的事情。我想要做的是提供一个测试作为函数装饰器的参数运行。基本上:
@corresponding_test(TestSomething.test_a)
def my_function_a():
# Something here
然后在装饰器中基本检查在运行函数之前是否通过了该函数的测试。
答案 0 :(得分:2)
免责声明: 这是运行单元测试的一种好的标准方法。如果您使用此代码运行单元测试,那么您[可能]做错了。
那就是说,你的问题引起了我的兴趣,所以我继续为你写了一个工作演示:
"""
The `only_if_test_passes` decorator can be used to run a function if and
only if the argument test (unbound `TestCase` method) passes.
"""
import inspect
from unittest import TestCase, TestResult
class TestError(Exception):
pass
class MyTests(TestCase):
def test_pass(self):
# This passes because nothing went wrong
pass
def test_fail(self):
self.fail('This test will always fail')
def only_if_test_passes(test_method):
# Comments are computed values when passed MyTests.test_pass
test_case_class = inspect._findclass(test_method) # MyTests
test_case_name = test_case_class.__name__ # 'MyTests'
test_name = test_method.__name__ # 'test_pass'
# Introspection for Python 2:
# test_case_class = test_method.im_class
# test_case_name = test_case_class.__name__ # Same as for Python 3
# test_name = test_method.if_func.func_name
def decorator(fn):
def decorated(*args, **kwargs):
test_result = TestResult()
case = test_case_class(test_name) # MyTests('test_pass')
case(test_result)
if test_result.wasSuccessful():
return fn(*args, **kwargs)
else:
raise TestError('Unit test failed: {}.{}'.format(
test_case_name, test_name))
return decorated
return decorator
@only_if_test_passes(MyTests.test_pass)
def this_will_run():
print('This should output')
@only_if_test_passes(MyTests.test_fail)
def this_wont_ever_run():
print("Don't bother; you'll never see this.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
this_will_run()
this_wont_ever_run()
Python 2中的内省将略有不同。