使用内存中的单元测试.ToListAsync()

时间:2016-12-25 21:53:44

标签: asp.net entity-framework unit-testing

下面是那种失败的测试。由于内存dbsets不支持.ToListAsync()而导致的NotThrow()(我没有准确的措辞,但你得到了图片)。如果它有任何重要性,我正在尝试模拟Entity Framework ver提供的dbset。 6.1.3:

[TestFixture]
public class Tests
{
    private SomeRepository _repository;
    private Mock<DbSet<SomeEntity>> _mockDbSet;
    private Mock<IApplicationDbContext> _mockAppDbContext;

    [OneTimeSetUp]
    public void TestFixtureSetUp()
    {
        _mockDbSet = new Mock<DbSet<SomeEntity>>();
        _mockAppDbContext = new Mock<IApplicationDbContext>();
        _mockAppDbContext.SetupGet(c => c.Gigs).Returns(_mockGigsDbSet.Object);

        _repository = new SomeRepository(_mockAppDbContext.Object);
    }

    [Test]
    public void Test()
    {
        // Setup
        var results = (IEnumerable<SomeEntity>) null;
        var singleEntity = new SomeEntity {Id = "1"};
        _mockDbSet.SetSource(new List<SomeEntity> { singleEntity });

        // Act
        var action = new Func<Task>(async () =>
        {
            results = await _repository.GetMultipleAsync(); //this ends up calling "await mockDbSet.ToListAsync().ConfigureAwait(false)" internally
        });

        // Verify
        action.ShouldNotThrow(); //an exception is thrown about .ToListAsync() not being supported by in-memory dbsets or something to that effect
        results.Should().BeEmpty();
    }
}

如果同步使用.ToList()代替基于异步的.ToListAsync(),则上述测试按预期工作。在实际的asp.net中使用时,存储库也可以正常工作。

那么在这些单元测试中使用.ToListAsync()模拟dbset的正确方法是什么?

P.S。:我一直在进行单元测试的项目可以在这里找到:

       https://bitbucket.org/dsidirop/gighub

由于.ToListAsync()导致失败的单元测试标记为“暂时失败”。

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

向布拉德福德狄龙致敬,提供正确答案:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn314429(v=vs.113).aspx

为存储库的异步方法创建单元测试的正确方法是首先创建这些实用程序模型类:

using System.Collections.Generic; 
using System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure; 
using System.Linq; 
using System.Linq.Expressions; 
using System.Threading; 
using System.Threading.Tasks; 

namespace TestingDemo 
{ 
    internal class TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<TEntity> : IDbAsyncQueryProvider 
    { 
        private readonly IQueryProvider _inner; 

        internal TestDbAsyncQueryProvider(IQueryProvider inner) 
        { 
            _inner = inner; 
        } 

        public IQueryable CreateQuery(Expression expression) 
        { 
            return new TestDbAsyncEnumerable<TEntity>(expression); 
        } 

        public IQueryable<TElement> CreateQuery<TElement>(Expression expression) 
        { 
            return new TestDbAsyncEnumerable<TElement>(expression); 
        } 

        public object Execute(Expression expression) 
        { 
            return _inner.Execute(expression); 
        } 

        public TResult Execute<TResult>(Expression expression) 
        { 
            return _inner.Execute<TResult>(expression); 
        } 

        public Task<object> ExecuteAsync(Expression expression, CancellationToken cancellationToken) 
        { 
            return Task.FromResult(Execute(expression)); 
        } 

        public Task<TResult> ExecuteAsync<TResult>(Expression expression, CancellationToken cancellationToken) 
        { 
            return Task.FromResult(Execute<TResult>(expression)); 
        } 
    } 

    internal class TestDbAsyncEnumerable<T> : EnumerableQuery<T>, IDbAsyncEnumerable<T>, IQueryable<T> 
    { 
        public TestDbAsyncEnumerable(IEnumerable<T> enumerable) 
            : base(enumerable) 
        { } 

        public TestDbAsyncEnumerable(Expression expression) 
            : base(expression) 
        { } 

        public IDbAsyncEnumerator<T> GetAsyncEnumerator() 
        { 
            return new TestDbAsyncEnumerator<T>(this.AsEnumerable().GetEnumerator()); 
        } 

        IDbAsyncEnumerator IDbAsyncEnumerable.GetAsyncEnumerator() 
        { 
            return GetAsyncEnumerator(); 
        } 

        IQueryProvider IQueryable.Provider 
        { 
            get { return new TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<T>(this); } 
        } 
    } 

    internal class TestDbAsyncEnumerator<T> : IDbAsyncEnumerator<T> 
    { 
        private readonly IEnumerator<T> _inner; 

        public TestDbAsyncEnumerator(IEnumerator<T> inner) 
        { 
            _inner = inner; 
        } 

        public void Dispose() 
        { 
            _inner.Dispose(); 
        } 

        public Task<bool> MoveNextAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken) 
        { 
            return Task.FromResult(_inner.MoveNext()); 
        } 

        public T Current 
        { 
            get { return _inner.Current; } 
        } 

        object IDbAsyncEnumerator.Current 
        { 
            get { return Current; } 
        } 
    } 
}

然后像这样使用它们:

using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting; 
using Moq; 
using System.Collections.Generic; 
using System.Data.Entity; 
using System.Data.Entity.Infrastructure; 
using System.Linq; 
using System.Threading.Tasks; 

namespace TestingDemo 
{ 
    [TestClass] 
    public class AsyncQueryTests 
    { 
        [TestMethod] 
        public async Task GetAllBlogsAsync_orders_by_name() 
        { 

            var data = new List<Blog> 
            { 
                new Blog { Name = "BBB" }, 
                new Blog { Name = "ZZZ" }, 
                new Blog { Name = "AAA" }, 
            }.AsQueryable(); 

            var mockSet = new Mock<DbSet<Blog>>(); 
            mockSet.As<IDbAsyncEnumerable<Blog>>() 
                .Setup(m => m.GetAsyncEnumerator()) 
                .Returns(new TestDbAsyncEnumerator<Blog>(data.GetEnumerator())); 

            mockSet.As<IQueryable<Blog>>() 
                .Setup(m => m.Provider) 
                .Returns(new TestDbAsyncQueryProvider<Blog>(data.Provider)); 

            mockSet.As<IQueryable<Blog>>().Setup(m => m.Expression).Returns(data.Expression); 
            mockSet.As<IQueryable<Blog>>().Setup(m => m.ElementType).Returns(data.ElementType); 
            mockSet.As<IQueryable<Blog>>().Setup(m => m.GetEnumerator()).Returns(data.GetEnumerator()); 

            var mockContext = new Mock<BloggingContext>(); 
            mockContext.Setup(c => c.Blogs).Returns(mockSet.Object); 

            var service = new BlogService(mockContext.Object); 
            var blogs = await service.GetAllBlogsAsync(); 

            Assert.AreEqual(3, blogs.Count); 
            Assert.AreEqual("AAA", blogs[0].Name); 
            Assert.AreEqual("BBB", blogs[1].Name); 
            Assert.AreEqual("ZZZ", blogs[2].Name); 
        } 
    } 
}

答案 1 :(得分:1)

您应该专注于对应用程序(逻辑)进行单元测试,而不是实体框架 - 这是Microsoft的工作。为数据层添加一个漂亮的接口,以便在为(应用程序)业务逻辑编写单元测试时可以模拟该接口。