Swift - 如何存储在泛型

时间:2016-11-30 13:40:00

标签: arrays swift generics subclass

所以,我有一个泛型(有限制)类和它的子类,它们在子类化时具有泛型类型。

我想将这些子类的实例存储在一个数组中,这样它们就可以以相同的方式迭代并处理所有子类,但显然,没有办法从子类转换为泛型超类。

以下是一些说明问题的代码(您可以将其复制粘贴到操场上以查看结果):

// Lets create regular classes
class Fruit {
    var text: String { return "I am some Fruit" }
}

class Apple: Fruit {
    override var text: String { return "I am an Apple" }
}
class Orange: Fruit {
    override var text: String { return "I am an Orange" }
}

// This obviously works:
let test1: Fruit = Apple()
let test2: Fruit = Orange()


// Let's create some generic class
class Tree<T: Fruit> {
    let fruit: T
    init(fruit: T) {
        self.fruit = fruit
    }
}

// Subclasses from the generic class (these work)
class AppleTree: Tree<Apple> {
    convenience init() {
        self.init(fruit: Apple())
    }
}

class OrangeTree: Tree<Orange> {
    convenience init() {
        self.init(fruit: Orange())
    }
}

// This works:
let tree: Tree<Fruit> = Tree(fruit: Apple())
tree.fruit.text               // "I am an Apple"

// This works:
let appleTree1: Tree<Apple> = AppleTree()
appleTree1.fruit.text     // "I am an Apple"

// This fails: "Cannot convert value of type 'AppleTree' to specified type 'Tree<Fruit>'
let appleTree2: Tree<Fruit> = AppleTree()

// This works:
let fruitArray: [Fruit] = [Apple(), Orange()]

// THIS IS MY GOAL:
// This fails: "Cannot convert value of type 'AppleTree' to specified type 'Tree<Fruit>'
let treeArray: [Tree<Fruit>] = [AppleTree(), OrangeTree()]


// Let's try with a generic subclass
class FruitTree<T: Fruit>: Tree<T>{}

// This works:
let genericTree: Tree<Fruit> = FruitTree(fruit: Apple())

// Let's try with a generic but more concrete subclass
class GenericOrangeTree<T: Orange>: Tree<T>{
    convenience init() {
        self.init(fruit: Orange() as! T)
    }
}

// This works:
let genericOrangeTree1 = GenericOrangeTree(fruit: Orange())
let genericOrangeTree2 = GenericOrangeTree()

// This fails: Cannot invoke initializer for type 'GenericOrangeTree<Orange>' with an argument list of type '(fruit: Orange)'
let genericTree2: Tree<Fruit> = GenericOrangeTree(fruit: Orange())

// Again, this fails: "Cannot convert value of type 'GenericOrangeTree<Orange>' to specified type 'Tree<Fruit>'
let genericTreeArray: [Tree<Fruit>] = [GenericOrangeTree()]

我试图做的事情在示例代码中由treeArray变量说明。

我不明白代码失败时代码失败的原因。我的直觉说这应该有效,我无法找到解决这个问题的方法。

TL; DR:我有一个带有一些子类的Generic类,我想要一个用子类填充的Generic类数组,但编译器会抱怨。

3 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

您正在混淆Generics实现之前和之后的类型层次结构。使用泛型类/ func,您基本上可以设置一个在编译时解析的模板(编译器宏)。

如果你说

Generic<SubClass1>
Generic<SuperClass>

编译器将这些解析为类似:

class Generic_SubClass1 {
  let property : SubClass1
}
class Generic_SuperClass {
  let property : SuperClass
}

在解析泛型后,这两种类型不共享基本类型,因此不能相互转换。它们是完全分开的。

不确定也没试过,但也许这就是你想要的:

class GenericBase {
  let property : SuperClass
}
class Generic<T: SuperClass> : GenericBase {
  final var typedProperty : T {
    get { return property as T }
    set { property = T }
  }
}

然后,您可以使用GenericBase作为共同祖先,并使用动态类型来检查子类。

PS:你的代码有点难以理解,也许使用像'Fruit','Apple'和'Orange'这样的东西 - 比'Superclass','Subclass1','Subclass2'更容易阅读; - )< / p>

答案 1 :(得分:0)

也许你可以定义一个名为FruitTree的协议,它可以获得一个Fruit并返回某种Fruit:

protocol FruitTree {
    associatedType FruitKind
    func getFruit() -> Fruit
    func setFruit(FruitKind) 
}

然后,定义类如:

class AppleTree: FruitTree {
   var apple Apple
   typeAlias FruitKind = Apple
   func getFruit() -> Apple {return apple}
   func setFruit(Apple a} {apple = a}
}
class OrangeTree: FruitTree {
   var orange Orange
   typeAlias FruitKind = Orange
   func getFruit() -> Orange { return orange}
   func setFruit(Orange o) {orange= o}
}
let treeArray: [FruitTree] = [AppleTree(), OrangeTree()]

答案 2 :(得分:0)

我认为您正在寻找的是类型擦除。

例如,对您进行以下成像:

protocol ClassWithView {
    associatedType: View: UIView
    var view: View { get set }
}

class ConcreteWithView {
    associatedType View = SubclassOfUIView 
    var view: SubclassOfUIView
}

// Somewhere this will fail because there is missing associated type information
var array: [ConcreteWithView]

使用类型擦除,您可以强制执行对数组的任何访问将只允许您访问常见的UIView内容。像上面这样修改:

protocol AnyClassWithView {
      var baseView: UIView
}

protocol ClassWithView: AnyClassWithView {
    associatedType: View: UIView
    var view: View { get set }
}

// Default implementation
extension AnyClassWithView {
    var baseView: UIView {
       return view as UIView
    }
}

现在,在其他地方,您可以定义数组:

var array: [AnyClassWithView]

这将成功,并且您只能使用.baseView访问UIView类型。您可以将内容添加到AnyClassWithView定义中,并使用共享的UIView进行操作。

如果要访问各个子类型,请在其上创建一个接受通用参数的函数,并且应该能够进行强制转换以访问子类型信息。