我尝试实现A *算法。我不知道为什么,但是我收到了这个错误:
我的图表和启发式是这样的:
我在创建节点时编写了启发式的值。以及创建边缘时边缘的值。
以下是代码:
package com.astar.algorithm;
import java.util.PriorityQueue;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Comparator;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
public class AStar {
public static void main(String[] args){
Node s = new Node("S", 12);
Node a = new Node("A", 5);
Node b = new Node("B", 5);
Node c = new Node("C", 5);
Node d = new Node("D", 2);
Node e = new Node("E", 2);
Node f = new Node("F", 1);
Node h = new Node("H", 1);
Node g = new Node("G", 0);
s.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(b, 8),
new Edge(a, 10)
};
b.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(d, 8),
new Edge(g, 16)
};
d.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(g, 3),
new Edge(h, 1)
};
h.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(f, 1)
};
a.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(g, 10),
new Edge(c, 2)
};
c.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(e, 3)
};
e.adjacencies = new Edge[]{
new Edge(g, 2)
};
AstarSearch(s, g);
List<Node> path = printPath(g);
System.out.println("Path: " + path);
}
public static List<Node> printPath(Node target){
List<Node> path = new ArrayList<Node>();
for(Node node = target; node!=null; node = node.parent){
path.add(node);
}
Collections.reverse(path);
return path;
}
public static void AstarSearch(Node source, Node goal){
Set<Node> explored = new HashSet<Node>();
PriorityQueue<Node> queue = new PriorityQueue<Node>(8, new Comparator<Node>(){
//override compare method
public int compare(Node i, Node j){
if(i.f_scores > j.f_scores){
return 1;
}
else if (i.f_scores < j.f_scores){
return -1;
}
else{
return 0;
}
}
}
);
//cost from start
source.g_scores = 0;
queue.add(source);
boolean found = false;
while((!queue.isEmpty())&&(!found)){
//the node in having the lowest f_score value
Node current = queue.poll();
explored.add(current);
//goal found
if(current.value.equals(goal.value)){
found = true;
}
//check every child of current node
for(Edge o : current.adjacencies){
Node child = o.target;
double cost = o.cost;
double temp_g_scores = current.g_scores + cost;
double temp_f_scores = temp_g_scores + child.h_scores;
/*if child node has been evaluated and
the newer f_score is higher, skip*/
if((explored.contains(child)) && (temp_f_scores >= child.f_scores)) {
continue;
}
/*else if child node is not in queue or
newer f_score is lower*/
else if((!queue.contains(child)) || (temp_f_scores < child.f_scores)){
child.parent = current;
child.g_scores = temp_g_scores;
child.f_scores = temp_f_scores;
if(queue.contains(child)){
queue.remove(child);
}
queue.add(child);
}
}
}
}
}
class Node{
public final String value;
public double g_scores;
public final double h_scores;
public double f_scores = 0;
public Edge[] adjacencies;
public Node parent;
public Node(String val, double hVal){
value = val;
h_scores = hVal;
}
public String toString(){
return value;
}
}
class Edge{
public final double cost;
public final Node target;
public Edge(Node targetNode, double costVal){
target = targetNode;
cost = costVal;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:3)
Your program fails at node G when it adds a Node to the queue without setting adjacencies to any values.
The following piece of code tries to add child without assigned adjacencies:
queue.add(child);
The quick fix would be to change Node class and initialize adjacencies with an empty array like this:
public Edge[] adjacencies = new Edge[]{};
So the Node class would look like:
class Node{
public final String value;
public double g_scores;
public final double h_scores;
public double f_scores = 0;
public Edge[] adjacencies = new Edge[]{};
public Node parent;
public Node(String val, double hVal){
value = val;
h_scores = hVal;
}
public String toString(){
return value;
}
}
The better solution would be replace array with ArrayList.
答案 1 :(得分:1)
您没有为adjacencies
和Node f
初始化任何Node g
,但在某些边缘中将它们设置为目标节点。因此,当您浏览for(Edge o : current.adjacencies)
并设置Node child = o.target
时,这个孩子实际上可能是Node f
或Node b
,因为您没有初始化adjacencies
对于那些您在current.adjacencies
获得NPE的人,因为f/g.adjacencies == null
。
因此,为了防止NPE,您还应首先使用空f
数组初始化g
和Edge
的邻接关系。
所以f/g.adjacencies = new Edge[0];
至少应该解决NPE问题。