以下单行内容在Scala REPL中挂起
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
import scala.concurrent.{Future, future, Await}
import scala.concurrent.duration._
def fib(n: Int): Int = {println(n + " is handeled by " + Thread.currentThread.getName) ; if (n < 2) n else Await.result( Future.sequence(List(1,2) map (i => Future{println(n-i); n-i} map fib)) map (_.sum), Duration.Inf)} ; fib(3)
其核心是
val lf: List[Future[Int]] = List(1,2) map (i => Future{n-i} map fib)
val f: Future[List[Int]] = Future.sequence(lf)
Await.result(f, Inf)
它也挂在菊石翻译中。它更先进,允许打破执行,可能堆栈跟踪会告诉你一些事情
def fib(n: Int): Int = {println(n + " is handeled by " + Thread.currentThread.getName) ; if (n < 2) n else Await.result( Future.sequence(List(1,2) map (i => Future{println(n-i); n-i} map fib)) map (_.sum), Duration.Inf)} ; fib(3)
3 is handeled by main
1
2
^C
Interrupted!
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class ammonite.session.cmd3$
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply$mcII$sp(cmd3.scala:1)
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(cmd3.scala:1)
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(cmd3.scala:1)
at scala.util.Success$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Try.scala:237)
at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
at scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$AdaptedForkJoinTask.exec(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:121)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.pollAndExecAll(ForkJoinPool.java:1253)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1346)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class ammonite.session.cmd3$
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply$mcII$sp(cmd3.scala:1)
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(cmd3.scala:1)
at ammonite.session.cmd3$$anonfun$fib$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(cmd3.scala:1)
at scala.util.Success$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Try.scala:237)
at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
at scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$AdaptedForkJoinTask.exec(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:121)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinTask.doExec(ForkJoinTask.java:260)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool$WorkQueue.runTask(ForkJoinPool.java:1339)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinPool.runWorker(ForkJoinPool.java:1979)
at scala.concurrent.forkjoin.ForkJoinWorkerThread.run(ForkJoinWorkerThread.java:107)
ubuntu-workspace@
如您所见,代码显示n=3 is handeled by main
,打印1和2并挂起。这意味着期货已经开始但尚未完成。它们不按照地图的要求进行。我可以将Future{n-i} map fib
替换为Future{fib(n-i)}
,但不会发生任何变化。同时,代码在Scastie中正常进行。这表明行为在很大程度上取决于背景。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
这是关于在对象初始值设定项中启动线程的重复问题。
快速解决方法是使用scala -Yrepl-class-based
。
相关问题:Scala: Parallel collection in object initializer causes a program to hang