我目前正在使用这个:
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#Source') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Source
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#Target') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Target
CREATE TABLE #Source
(
Point GEOGRAPHY
);
CREATE TABLE #Target
(
Point GEOGRAPHY
);
DECLARE @PointBufferDistanceInMeters FLOAT;
SET @PointBufferDistanceInMeters = 3;
INSERT #Source SELECT GEOGRAPHY::STPointFromText(N'POINT(102.0 0.5)', 4326);
INSERT #Source SELECT GEOGRAPHY::STPointFromText(N'POINT(102.0 0.5)', 4326);
INSERT #Source SELECT GEOGRAPHY::STPointFromText(N'POINT(102.0 0.50009)', 4326); -- 10 meter-ish away
SELECT * FROM #Source
INSERT INTO #Target
SELECT
GEOGRAPHY::STPointFromText(Wkt, 4326)
FROM
(
SELECT DISTINCT Point.STAsText() AS Wkt
FROM #Source AS S
WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 42
FROM #Target
WHERE S.Point.STDistance(Point) < @PointBufferDistanceInMeters)
) X
SELECT Point.STAsText() FROM #Target
插入&#39; unique&#39;将点(缓冲区为3米)放入目标表#Target中。我测试了它,似乎工作正常。结果是预期的:
POINT (102 0.5)
POINT (102 0.50009)
只是好奇,这可以在效率方面得到改善,还是有人在这里看到任何不妥之处?感谢。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您的INSERT
仅过滤当前状态#Target
。如果#Source
包含一些不同于@PointBufferDistanceInMeters
的非相同点,则会插入它们。
我担心目前处理GEOGRAPHY
数据的唯一防弹方法是通过RBAR,与双转换Point.STAsText() AS Wkt
=&gt;相比,这可能不是那么低效。 GEOGRAPHY::STPointFromText(Wkt, 4326)
。