所以我有这三个文件
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include "support.h"
int main( void ) {
int* num1 = malloc(100);
printf("num1: %p", &num1);
}
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "support.h"
void *malloc(size_t size) {
struct block_meta *block;
if (size <= 0) {
return NULL;
}
if (!global_base) { // First call.
block = request_space(NULL, size);
if (!block) {
return NULL;
}
global_base = block;
} else {
struct block_meta *last = global_base;
block = find_free_block(&last, size);
if (!block) { // Failed to find free block.
block = request_space(last, size);
if (!block) {
return NULL;
}
} else { // Found free block
block->free = 0;
block->magic = 0x77777777;
}
}
return(block+1);
}
void free(void *ptr) {
if (!ptr) {
return;
}
struct block_meta* block_ptr = get_block_ptr(ptr);
assert(block_ptr->free == 0);
assert(block_ptr->magic == 0x77777777 || block_ptr->magic == 0x12345678);
block_ptr->free = 1;
block_ptr->magic = 0x55555555;
}
void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size) {
if (!ptr) {
// NULL ptr. realloc should act like malloc.
return malloc(size);
}
struct block_meta* block_ptr = get_block_ptr(ptr);
if (block_ptr->size >= size) {
// We have enough space. Could free some once we implement split.
return ptr;
}
// Need to really realloc. Malloc new space and free old space.
// Then copy old data to new space.
void *new_ptr;
new_ptr = malloc(size);
if (!new_ptr) {
return NULL; // TODO: set errno on failure.
}
memcpy(new_ptr, ptr, block_ptr->size);
free(ptr);
return new_ptr;
}
void *calloc(size_t nelem, size_t elsize) {
size_t size = nelem * elsize; // TODO: check for overflow.
void *ptr = malloc(size);
memset(ptr, 0, size);
return ptr;
}
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
void *malloc(size_t size);
void free(void *ptr);
void *realloc(void *ptr, size_t size);
struct block_meta {
size_t size;
struct block_meta *next;
int free;
int magic; // For debugging only. TODO: remove this in non-debug mode.
};
#define META_SIZE sizeof(struct block_meta)
void *global_base = NULL;
struct block_meta *find_free_block(struct block_meta **last, size_t size) {
struct block_meta *current = global_base;
while (current && !(current->free && current->size >= size)) {
*last = current;
current = current->next;
}
return current;
}
struct block_meta *request_space(struct block_meta* last, size_t size) {
struct block_meta *block;
block = sbrk(0);
void *request = sbrk(size + META_SIZE);
assert((void*)block == request); // Not thread safe.
if (request == (void*) -1) {
return NULL; // sbrk failed.
}
if (last) { // NULL on first request.
last->next = block;
}
block->size = size;
block->next = NULL;
block->free = 0;
block->magic = 0x12345678;
return block;
}
struct block_meta *get_block_ptr(void *ptr) {
return (struct block_meta*)ptr - 1;
}
但是当我尝试使用
进行编译时gcc -o asgn2 main.c support.c
我收到错误
/tmp/ccscmcbS.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `global_base'
/tmp/ccyjhjQC.o:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
/tmp/ccscmcbS.o: In function `find_free_block':
support.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `find_free_block'
/tmp/ccyjhjQC.o:main.c:(.text+0x0): first defined here
/tmp/ccscmcbS.o: In function `request_space':
support.c:(.text+0x55): multiple definition of `request_space'
/tmp/ccyjhjQC.o:main.c:(.text+0x55): first defined here
/tmp/ccscmcbS.o: In function `get_block_ptr':
support.c:(.text+0xfe): multiple definition of `get_block_ptr'
/tmp/ccyjhjQC.o:main.c:(.text+0xfe): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
我不相信我不止一次宣布这些方法,而且它的格式也与我通常给出的格式大不相同。不太清楚这意味着什么。
答案 0 :(得分:9)
问题是你的头文件中有函数和全局定义(而不是声明)。因此,这些函数在编译时会被拉入main.c和support.c中。然后在链接阶段,链接器会看到多个定义。
即使你有包含警卫,在这种情况下它也无济于事,因为它只能防御单个编译单元中的多个定义,而不是多个单元。
从头文件中取出这些函数的定义,用声明替换它们,并将它们放在support.c或单独的.c文件中。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
确保标题仅包含一次,因此请在标题源代码中添加以下内容:
#ifndef _HAVE_SUPPORT_H
#define _HAVE_SUPPORT_H
// ...
// YOUR HEADER SOURCE CODE
// ...
#endif //_HAVE_SUPPORT_H
正如我所说,这确保标题只包含一次,因为它定义了_HAVE_SUPPORT_H
。如果现在另一个源尝试包含它,它将不会执行任何操作,因为已经定义了_HAVE_SUPPRORT_H
。
如果标题中只有函数声明,而且“真正的”函数将放在另一个*.c
文件中,它也会有所帮助。
编辑: 第二部分对你的问题最重要,因为@kaylum注意到了
答案 2 :(得分:0)
您可以对 gcc 使用 -fcommon 选项。