a-weighting as digital filter

时间:2016-02-09 12:41:38

标签: matlab signal-processing digital-filter

我正在尝试创建一个数字过滤器,为a-weighting规范创建接近结果:reference

我已经用2 nd 和6 th 阶IIR滤波器创建了简单的低通和高通。我还创建了一个由3个双二阶组成的级联二阶序列。这些过滤器看起来效果很好。我用octave / matlab buttertf2sos函数生成系数。过滤器以C ++实现,并应用于我的音频输入。处理后的音频将转换为频域并显示在我的屏幕上。

现在我的问题是如何实现a-weighting过滤器。我已经尝试过在互联网上找到的matlab代码:

Fs = 44100;
f1 = 20.598997; 
f2 = 107.65265;
f3 = 737.86223;
f4 = 12194.217;
A1000 = 1.9997;
pi = 3.14159265358979;
NUMs = [ (2*pi*f4)^2*(10^(A1000/20)) 0 0 0 0 ];
DENs = conv([1 +4*pi*f4 (2*pi*f4)^2],[1 +4*pi*f1 (2*pi*f1)^2]); 
DENs = conv(conv(DENs,[1 2*pi*f3]),[1 2*pi*f2]);
[B,A] = bilinear(NUMs,DENs,Fs);

printf('%0.16f\n',A);
1.0000000000000000
5.9999984423677502
14.9999922118394622
19.9999844236803490
14.9999844236817736
5.9999922118415991
0.9999984423684625

printf('%0.16f\n',B);
0.0000000000000000
-0.0000000000000000
-0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000
-0.0000000000000000
-0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000

这些系数看起来很奇怪,它们也不适用于我的6 th 命令IIR。所以我尝试创建级联双二阶:

sos = tf2sos(B,A);
printf('%0.16f\n',sos);
0.0000000000000000
1.0000000000000000
1.0000000000000000
-0.0000000000000000
-2.0001419687327253
1.9999999999999987
0.0000000000000000
1.0001419788113322
0.9999999999999984
1.0000000000000000
1.0000000000000000
1.0000000000000000
2.0044328398652649
1.9955456521230652
2.0000199503794249
1.0044526299594496
0.9955653535664766
1.0000002046824734

但这些系数也不起作用。可能是因为系数首先是错误的吗?

有人能指出我,如何正确实施数字加权滤波器?

修改 感谢下面的SleuthEye的回答,我可以用八度音阶中正确的系数实现a加权滤波器。

我在网络和win32-filter-generator应用程序中发现了很多不同的过滤器c ++实现,但它们似乎都不一致。

最后,我发现两个基本上以相同方式工作的代码片段:

所以我基本上从那里复制了代码并最终得到了这个:(它的转置直接形式II实现)

定义:

class Biquad{

public:

    Biquad(double a0, double a1, double a2, double b0, double b1, double b2) {
        this->a0 = a0;
        this->a1 = a1;
        this->a2 = a2;
        this->b0 = b0;
        this->b1 = b1;
        this->b2 = b2;
        z1 = z2 = 0.0;
    }

    double filter(double in) {
        double out = z1 + b0 * in;
        z1 = z2 + b1 * in - a1 * out;
        z2 = b2 * in - a2 * out;
        return out;
    }

private:
    double a0, a1, a2, b0, b1, b2;
    double z1, z2;
};

初​​始化:

Biquad *a1Filter = new Biquad(1.0000000, -0.1405361, 0.0049376, 0.2557411, -0.5114387, 0.2556976);
Biquad *a2Filter = new Biquad(1.0000000, -1.8849012, 0.8864215, 1.0000000, -2.0001702, 1.0001702);
Biquad *a3Filter = new Biquad(1.0000000, -1.9941389, 0.9941475, 1.0000000, 2.0000000, 1.0000000);

调用:

double outputValue = a3Filter->filter(a2Filter->filter(a1Filter->filter(inputValue)));

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

为了得到您引用的结果,您似乎实际上正在使用Octave的bilinear(已知有一些incompatibilities with Matlab),其中第三个参数是采样周期(而不是Matlab's bilinear的采样频率。

要解决此问题,您可以将采样周期设为1/Fs,并相应地计算系数:

[B,A] = bilinear(NUMs,DENs,1/Fs);

然后您应该能够通过以下方式确认过滤器响应:

fmin = 10;    % Hz
fmax = 20000; % Hz
omega = logspace(log10(2*pi*fmin), log10(2*pi*fmax));
Ha = freqs(NUMs,DENs,omega);
hold off; semilogx(omega/(2*pi), 20*log10(abs(Ha)), 'b');

N = ceil(Fs/fmin);
[Hd,W] = freqz(B,A,N);
hold on; semilogx(W*Fs/(2*pi), 20*log10(abs(Hd)), 'r');

这应该给你下面的图表(蓝色曲线是参考,红色曲线是你的系数):

enter image description here