给定二叉树,我试图找到具有最高出现次数的二叉树级别,例如Apple
。
以下是规格:
data Fruit = Peach | Apple
data BTree a = Empty | Node a (BTree a) (BTree a)
levelWithMaxApples :: BTree Fruit -> Int
我能够创建一个函数,在给定二叉树的情况下,它将计算其中Apple
的出现次数。然而,我无法弄清楚如何找到Apple
出现次数最多的级别,任何提示?
以下是一些测试:
tree1 = Node Peach Empty Empty
tree2 = Node Peach
(Node Peach
(Node Apple
Empty
Empty)
(Node Peach
(Node Peach
Empty
Empty)
(Node Peach
Empty
Empty)))
(Node Apple
(Node Apple
Empty
(Node Peach
Empty
Empty))
Empty)
> levelWithMaxApples tree1
Nothing
> levelWithMaxApples tree2
2
这是我的尝试(在这种情况下,函数的名称应为countApples
:
levelWithMaxApples Empty = 0
levelWithMaxApples (Node Apple l r) = 1 + levelWithMaxApple l + levelWithMaxApple r
levelWithMaxApples (Node Peach l r) = levelWithMaxApple l + levelWithMaxApple r
感谢您的帮助!
答案 0 :(得分:2)
这个答案是literate Haskell。您可以使用.lhs
扩展名对其进行保存,然后将其加载到GHCi中。
> import Data.Ord (comparing)
> import Data.List (maximumBy)
> data Fruit = Peach | Apple
> data BTree a = Empty | Node a (BTree a) (BTree a)
尝试将其分解为更小的部分。首先,编写一个函数,生成树中所有级别的列表:
> levels :: BTree a -> [[a]]
> levels Empty = []
> levels (Node x l r) = [x] : combine (levels l) (levels r)
> where combine [] ys = ys
> combine xs [] = xs
> combine (x:xs) (y:ys) = (x ++ y) : combine xs ys
(请注意,此处的combine
辅助函数与zipWith (++)
类似,但在最短输入用尽后继续。
完成后,您可以很容易地在列表中找到Apple
的实例(如果您将deriving Eq
添加到Fruit
定义,则会更容易:
> countEach :: (a -> Bool) -> [[a]] -> [Int]
> countEach pred = map (length . filter pred)
> countApples :: [[Fruit]] -> [Int]
> countApples = countEach isApple
> where isApple Apple = True
> isApple _ = False
接下来,您只需使用zip
标记列表中的每个项目及其索引编号,然后使用maximumBy
选择计数最多的项目:
> levelWithMaxApples :: BTree Fruit -> Int
> levelWithMaxApples t = let ls = levels t
> counts = countApples ls
> labeled = zip [0..] counts
> in fst . maximumBy (comparing snd) $ labeled
答案 1 :(得分:1)
这是另一种方式。
从辅助函数开始。这将简单地构建节点的原始列表以及该节点处的Apple
计数。但是,对每个子树中的每个节点分别进行此操作,即列表将类似于[(Root,1),(L1,1),(L2,0),(R1,1)]
import qualified Data.Map as M (fromListWith,toList)
import qualified Data.List as L (sortBy)
countApples' :: BTree Fruit -> Int -> [(Int,Int)]
countApples' Empty _ = []
countApples' (Node Apple l r) n = (n,1) : (countApples' l (n+1)) ++ (countApples' r (n+1))
countApples' (Node Peach l r) n = (n,0) : (countApples' l (n+1)) ++ (countApples' r (n+1))
接下来,我们使用上面的步骤创建一个Map。在此步骤中,我们将聚合树的每个级别的值。然后我们转换回列表并按元组的值部分按降序排序。具有最大apple实例的级别将成为列表头部元组中的第一个元素。
levelWithMaxApples :: BTree Fruit -> Int
levelWithMaxApples Empty = error "Empty tree"
levelWithMaxApples x = fst $ head $ L.sortBy (\(k1,v1) (k2,v2) -> compare v2 v1) $ M.toList $ M.fromListWith (+) $ countApples' x 0
但是,您应该注意,这可能不是一个非常有效的解决方案,因为除了排序之外还要转换为Map。
注意:排序部分主要基于this回答。
更新:以下是使用Google地图完成此操作的方法。
import qualified Data.Map as M
countApples :: BTree Fruit -> Int -> M.Map Int Int
countApples Empty _ = M.empty
countApples (Node Apple l r) n = M.unionsWith (+) [(M.singleton n 1 ),(countApples l (n+1)),(countApples r (n+1))]
countApples (Node Peach l r) n = M.unionsWith (+) [(M.singleton n 0 ),(countApples l (n+1)),(countApples r (n+1))]
levelWithMaxApples :: BTree Fruit -> Int
levelWithMaxApples t = fst $ M.foldWithKey (\k v acc@(k',v') -> if v >= v' then (k,v) else acc) (-1,-1) $ countApples t 0