可能重复:
Why does C# execute Math.Sqrt() more slowly than VB.NET?
我遇到了一个有趣的问题,其中我在VB.net中有代码,在C ++中有完全相同的代码。我希望C ++自然比VB.net运行得更快,但我得到的恰恰相反:VB.net的运行速度是C ++的两倍多。程序遍历从1到2,000,000的所有数字,确定它们是否为素数,并将所有素数加在一起。以下是以下片段:
C ++
void problem10(void)
{
clock_t init, final;
init=clock();
int maxVal = 2000000;
long long sumOfPrimes = 0;
for (long i = 2; i < maxVal; i++)
{
if (isPrime(i))
{
sumOfPrimes+= i;
}
}
final = clock() - init;
cout << (double)final / ((double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
cout << "The sum of all the prime numbers below " << maxVal << " is " << sumOfPrimes;
}
bool isPrime(int NumToCheck)
{
for (int i = 2; i <= (sqrt((double)NumToCheck)); i++)
{
if (NumToCheck % i == 0)
{
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
C ++输出:
3.846The sum of all the prime numbers below 2000000 is 142913828922
这是完全相同的事情,只用VB.net编写
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
Dim watch As New Stopwatch
watch.Start()
Dim maxVal As Long = 2000000
Dim sumOfPrimes As Long = 0
For i As Integer = 2 To maxVal
If (isPrime(i) = True) Then
sumOfPrimes += i
End If
Next
watch.Stop()
Console.WriteLine(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds)
Console.WriteLine("The sum of all the prime numbers below " & maxVal & " is " & sumOfPrimes)
End Sub
Function isPrime(ByVal NumToCheck As Integer) As Boolean
For i As Integer = 2 To (Math.Sqrt(CDbl(NumToCheck)))
If (NumToCheck Mod i = 0) Then
Return False
End If
Next
Return True
End Function
VB输出:
1643
The sum of all the prime numbers below 2000000 is 142913828922
我觉得有一些明显的东西让我失踪,因为我真的看不到VB.net比C ++更快。有什么想法吗?
答案 0 :(得分:8)
VB.Net解决方案在循环开始时计算一次平方根,而C ++(以及C和C#和Java等)都通过循环计算平方根,因为它们的循环基元定义不同
答案 1 :(得分:6)
你的问题是那个
For i As Integer = 2 To (Math.Sqrt(CDbl(NumToCheck)))
与
不同for (int i = 2; i <= (sqrt((double)NumToCheck)); i++)
VB.Net将在开始时对Math.Sqrt进行一次评估,而c ++必须在每次迭代时对其进行评估。在C#而不是c ++的stackoverflow上已经存在同样的问题。