我有一个案例,我想在服务中注册一个参数或没有参数闭包。总有一个参数可用,但为了简洁起见,我希望能够注册没有arg闭包,然后在这种情况下只调度闭包而没有可用的参数。来自强大的OO和动态类型背景,我们喜欢多态分派和类继承树,并让类型自我解决,我可以将以下内容放在一起:
class AbstractAction<T> {
func publish(value:T) {
fatalError("you should override this")
}
}
class NullaryAction<T>: AbstractAction<T> {
var closure:() -> ()
override func publish(_:T) {
closure()
}
init(closure:()->()) {
self.closure = closure
}
}
class UnaryAction<T>: AbstractAction<T> {
var closure:(T) -> ()
override func publish(value:T) {
closure(value)
}
init(closure:(T)->()) {
self.closure = closure
}
}
var action:AbstractAction = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { print("\($0)") })
action.publish(42)
action = NullaryAction<Int>(closure: { print("something happened") } )
action.publish(42)
所以我在控制台中看到42
后跟something happened
。大。
但我想通过struct
和/或enum
来探索这一点。价值语义风靡一时。我认为enum
方法相对简单:
enum Action<T> {
case Nullary( ()->() )
case Unary( (T)->() )
func publish(value:T) {
switch self {
case .Nullary(let closure):
closure()
case .Unary(let closure):
closure(value)
}
}
}
var action = Action.Unary({ (arg:Int) -> () in print("\(arg)") })
action.publish(42)
action = Action<Int>.Unary( { print("shorthand too \($0)") } )
action.publish(42)
action = Action<Int>.Nullary({ print("something happened") })
action.publish(42)
要做struct
方法,我理解我应该使用协议来捕获publish(value:T)
的公共接口。但事情变得令人困惑,因为协议显然不能与泛型相混合?我试过了:
struct NullaryAction<T> {
typealias ValueType = T
var closure:() -> ()
}
struct UnaryAction<T> {
typealias ValueType = T
var closure:(T) -> ()
}
protocol Action {
typealias ValueType
func publish(value:ValueType)
}
extension NullaryAction: Action {
func publish(_:ValueType) {
self.closure()
}
}
extension UnaryAction: Action {
func publish(value:ValueType) {
self.closure(value)
}
}
var action:Action = UnaryAction(closure: { (arg:Int) -> () in print("\(arg)") })
action.publish(42)
action = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { print("shorthand too \($0)") } )
action.publish(42)
action = NullaryAction<Int>(closure:{ print("something happened") })
action.publish(42)
这只会在底部产生很多错误。我曾尝试将扩展名作为泛型(例如extension NullaryAction<T>:Action
),但它告诉我T
未被使用,即使我已将typealias
表达式放在扩展名中。
是否可以使用struct / protocol执行此操作?我对enum解决方案感到满意,但很失望,我无法用结构/协议方法实现它。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
根据您希望将结构转换为其协议(使用var action: Action = UnaryAction {...}
)这一事实来判断,我假设您不需要publish
方法来获取正确的签名它
换句话说,通过使用Action
声明typealias
协议,编译器期望为每个结构实例专门化publish
方法。
这意味着您有两个选择:
示例:
var action /*removed the :Action type casting */ = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { (arg:Int) -> () in print("\(arg)") })
action.publish(42)
action = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { print("shorthand too \($0)") } )
action.publish(42)
var anotherAction = NullaryAction<Int>(closure:{ print("something happened") }) //need to use another variable for this last one
anotherAction.publish(42)
此解决方案使您的publish
方法也具有与结构相同的签名。如果您的结构专门用于Ints
,那么您将拥有.publish(value: Int)
。
示例:
protocol Action {
func publish(value:Any)
}
struct NullaryAction<T>: Action {
let closure: () -> ()
init(closure: () -> ()) {
self.closure = closure
}
func publish(value:Any) {
self.closure()
}
}
struct UnaryAction<T>: Action {
let closure: (T) -> ()
init(closure: (T) -> ()) {
self.closure = closure
}
func publish(value:Any) {
self.closure(value as! T) //Need to type cast here
}
}
var action: Action = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { (arg:Int) -> () in print("\(arg)") })
action.publish(42)
action = UnaryAction<Int>(closure: { print("shorthand too \($0)") } )
action.publish(42)
action = NullaryAction<Int>(closure:{ print("something happened") })
action.publish(42)
此解决方案允许您继续进行类型转换,但您的publish
方法将具有相同的签名(.publish(value: Any)
)。您还需要在执行关闭时考虑到这一点。