我有一个提供三种不同$http.get
方法的工厂。
angular.module('myApp')
.factory('getFactory', function ($http, $q) {
return {
methodOne: function () {
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http.get('path/to/data')
.then(function successCallback (data) {
deferred.resolve(data);
},function errorCallback (response) {
console.log(response);
});
return deferred.promise;
},
methodTwo: function (arg1, arg2) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http.get('path/to/' + arg1 + '/some/' + arg2 + 'more/data')
.then(function successCallback (data) {
deferred.resolve(data);
},function errorCallback (response) {
console.log(response);
});
return deferred.promise;
},
methodThree: function (arg1, arg2, arg3) {
var deferred = $q.defer();
$http.get('path/to/' + arg1 + '/some/' + arg2 + '/more/' + arg3 + '/data')
.then(function successCallback (data) {
deferred.resolve(data);
},function errorCallback (response) {
console.log(response);
});
return deferred.promise;
},
};
});
基本上,这些方法仅在获取数据的路径上有所不同。这些方法获得的数据在控制器中处理。我一直在阅读很多 Angular最佳实践,并且一直在看DRY(不要重复自己)的提示。
我觉得我上面的代码太重复了。有没有更好的方法来编码 Angular方式?
**注意:我使用yeoman生成器来构建项目的目录。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
angular.module('myApp')
.factory('getFactory', function ($http, $q) {
//Using revealing Module pattern
var exposedAPI = {
methodOne: methodOne,
methodTwo: methodTwo,
methodThree: methodThree
};
return exposedAPI;
//Private function, not required to be exposed
function get(url){
//$http itself returns a promise, so no need to explicitly create another deferred object
return $http.get(url)
.then(function (data) {
//Create deferred object only if you want to manipulate returned data
}, function (msg, code) {
console.log(msg, code);
});
}
function methodOne() {
//DRY
return get('path/to/data');
}
function methodTwo(arg1, arg2) {
return get('path/to/' + arg1 + '/some/' + arg2 + 'more/data');
}
function methodThree(arg1, arg2, arg3) {
return get('path/to/' + arg1 + '/some/' + arg2 + '/more/' + arg3 + '/data');
}
});