以下是我的C档案：
int main()
{
return 36;
}
它只包含return语句。但是，如果我使用size命令，它会显示 输出如下：
mohanraj@ltsp63:~/Development/chap8$ size a.out
text data bss dec hex filename
1056 252 8 1316 524 a.out
mohanraj@ltsp63:~/Development/chap8$
即使我的程序不包含任何全局变量或未声明的数据。但是，输出显示数据段有252个，bss有8个字节。那么，为什么输出是这样的呢？什么是252和8指的。
答案 0 :(得分：4)
尺寸命令
首先看每列的定义：
正如蓝月亮所说。在Linux上，执行从调用_start（）函数开始。哪个环境设置。每个C程序都隐藏了“库”，这取决于您使用的编译器。有全局参数，退出调用的设置，完成配置后，它最终调用main（）函数。 ASFAIK无法通过配置和_start（）函数查看代码的外观。但我可以告诉你，即使你的代码包含的信息也比你认为的更接近我们的硬件。
提示：
输入readelf -a a.out以查看您的执行官真正携带的信息量。
里面是什么？
不要将源文件中的代码与可执行文件的大小进行比较，这取决于操作系统，编译器和使用过的库。
在我的示例中，使用完全相同的代码，SIZE返回：
eryk@eryk-pc:~$ gcc a.c
eryk@eryk-pc:~$ size a.out
text data bss dec hex filename
1033 276 4 1313 521 a.out
让我们看看里面是什么......
eryk@eryk-pc:~$ gcc -S a.c
这将在a.c上运行预处理程序，执行初始编译，然后在运行汇编程序之前停止。
eryk@eryk-pc:~$ cat a.s
.file "a.c"
.text
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
pushl %ebp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
.cfi_offset 5, -8
movl %esp, %ebp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 5
movl $36, %eax
popl %ebp
.cfi_restore 5
.cfi_def_cfa 4, 4
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size main, .-main
.ident "GCC: (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
然后查看汇编代码
eryk@eryk-pc:~$ objdump -d -M intel -S a.out
a.out: file format elf32-i386
Disassembly of section .init:
08048294 <_init>:
8048294: 53 push ebx
8048295: 83 ec 08 sub esp,0x8
8048298: e8 83 00 00 00 call 8048320 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx>
804829d: 81 c3 63 1d 00 00 add ebx,0x1d63
80482a3: 8b 83 fc ff ff ff mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebx-0x4]
80482a9: 85 c0 test eax,eax
80482ab: 74 05 je 80482b2 <_init+0x1e>
80482ad: e8 1e 00 00 00 call 80482d0 <__gmon_start__@plt>
80482b2: 83 c4 08 add esp,0x8
80482b5: 5b pop ebx
80482b6: c3 ret
Disassembly of section .plt:
080482c0 <__gmon_start__@plt-0x10>:
80482c0: ff 35 04 a0 04 08 push DWORD PTR ds:0x804a004
80482c6: ff 25 08 a0 04 08 jmp DWORD PTR ds:0x804a008
80482cc: 00 00 add BYTE PTR [eax],al
...
080482d0 <__gmon_start__@plt>:
80482d0: ff 25 0c a0 04 08 jmp DWORD PTR ds:0x804a00c
80482d6: 68 00 00 00 00 push 0x0
80482db: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp 80482c0 <_init+0x2c>
080482e0 <__libc_start_main@plt>:
80482e0: ff 25 10 a0 04 08 jmp DWORD PTR ds:0x804a010
80482e6: 68 08 00 00 00 push 0x8
80482eb: e9 d0 ff ff ff jmp 80482c0 <_init+0x2c>
Disassembly of section .text:
080482f0 <_start>:
80482f0: 31 ed xor ebp,ebp
80482f2: 5e pop esi
80482f3: 89 e1 mov ecx,esp
80482f5: 83 e4 f0 and esp,0xfffffff0
80482f8: 50 push eax
80482f9: 54 push esp
80482fa: 52 push edx
80482fb: 68 70 84 04 08 push 0x8048470
8048300: 68 00 84 04 08 push 0x8048400
8048305: 51 push ecx
8048306: 56 push esi
8048307: 68 ed 83 04 08 push 0x80483ed
804830c: e8 cf ff ff ff call 80482e0 <__libc_start_main@plt>
8048311: f4 hlt
8048312: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
8048314: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
8048316: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
8048318: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804831a: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804831c: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804831e: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
08048320 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx>:
8048320: 8b 1c 24 mov ebx,DWORD PTR [esp]
8048323: c3 ret
8048324: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
8048326: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
8048328: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804832a: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804832c: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
804832e: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
08048330 <deregister_tm_clones>:
8048330: b8 1f a0 04 08 mov eax,0x804a01f
8048335: 2d 1c a0 04 08 sub eax,0x804a01c
804833a: 83 f8 06 cmp eax,0x6
804833d: 77 01 ja 8048340 <deregister_tm_clones+0x10>
804833f: c3 ret
8048340: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0
8048345: 85 c0 test eax,eax
8048347: 74 f6 je 804833f <deregister_tm_clones+0xf>
8048349: 55 push ebp
804834a: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
804834c: 83 ec 18 sub esp,0x18
804834f: c7 04 24 1c a0 04 08 mov DWORD PTR [esp],0x804a01c
8048356: ff d0 call eax
8048358: c9 leave
8048359: c3 ret
804835a: 8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea esi,[esi+0x0]
08048360 <register_tm_clones>:
8048360: b8 1c a0 04 08 mov eax,0x804a01c
8048365: 2d 1c a0 04 08 sub eax,0x804a01c
804836a: c1 f8 02 sar eax,0x2
804836d: 89 c2 mov edx,eax
804836f: c1 ea 1f shr edx,0x1f
8048372: 01 d0 add eax,edx
8048374: d1 f8 sar eax,1
8048376: 75 01 jne 8048379 <register_tm_clones+0x19>
8048378: c3 ret
8048379: ba 00 00 00 00 mov edx,0x0
804837e: 85 d2 test edx,edx
8048380: 74 f6 je 8048378 <register_tm_clones+0x18>
8048382: 55 push ebp
8048383: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
8048385: 83 ec 18 sub esp,0x18
8048388: 89 44 24 04 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x4],eax
804838c: c7 04 24 1c a0 04 08 mov DWORD PTR [esp],0x804a01c
8048393: ff d2 call edx
8048395: c9 leave
8048396: c3 ret
8048397: 89 f6 mov esi,esi
8048399: 8d bc 27 00 00 00 00 lea edi,[edi+eiz*1+0x0]
080483a0 <__do_global_dtors_aux>:
80483a0: 80 3d 1c a0 04 08 00 cmp BYTE PTR ds:0x804a01c,0x0
80483a7: 75 13 jne 80483bc <__do_global_dtors_aux+0x1c>
80483a9: 55 push ebp
80483aa: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
80483ac: 83 ec 08 sub esp,0x8
80483af: e8 7c ff ff ff call 8048330 <deregister_tm_clones>
80483b4: c6 05 1c a0 04 08 01 mov BYTE PTR ds:0x804a01c,0x1
80483bb: c9 leave
80483bc: f3 c3 repz ret
80483be: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
080483c0 <frame_dummy>:
80483c0: a1 10 9f 04 08 mov eax,ds:0x8049f10
80483c5: 85 c0 test eax,eax
80483c7: 74 1f je 80483e8 <frame_dummy+0x28>
80483c9: b8 00 00 00 00 mov eax,0x0
80483ce: 85 c0 test eax,eax
80483d0: 74 16 je 80483e8 <frame_dummy+0x28>
80483d2: 55 push ebp
80483d3: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
80483d5: 83 ec 18 sub esp,0x18
80483d8: c7 04 24 10 9f 04 08 mov DWORD PTR [esp],0x8049f10
80483df: ff d0 call eax
80483e1: c9 leave
80483e2: e9 79 ff ff ff jmp 8048360 <register_tm_clones>
80483e7: 90 nop
80483e8: e9 73 ff ff ff jmp 8048360 <register_tm_clones>
080483ed <main>:
80483ed: 55 push ebp
80483ee: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
80483f0: b8 24 00 00 00 mov eax,0x24
80483f5: 5d pop ebp
80483f6: c3 ret
80483f7: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
80483f9: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
80483fb: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
80483fd: 66 90 xchg ax,ax
80483ff: 90 nop
08048400 <__libc_csu_init>:
8048400: 55 push ebp
8048401: 57 push edi
8048402: 31 ff xor edi,edi
8048404: 56 push esi
8048405: 53 push ebx
8048406: e8 15 ff ff ff call 8048320 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx>
804840b: 81 c3 f5 1b 00 00 add ebx,0x1bf5
8048411: 83 ec 1c sub esp,0x1c
8048414: 8b 6c 24 30 mov ebp,DWORD PTR [esp+0x30]
8048418: 8d b3 0c ff ff ff lea esi,[ebx-0xf4]
804841e: e8 71 fe ff ff call 8048294 <_init>
8048423: 8d 83 08 ff ff ff lea eax,[ebx-0xf8]
8048429: 29 c6 sub esi,eax
804842b: c1 fe 02 sar esi,0x2
804842e: 85 f6 test esi,esi
8048430: 74 27 je 8048459 <__libc_csu_init+0x59>
8048432: 8d b6 00 00 00 00 lea esi,[esi+0x0]
8048438: 8b 44 24 38 mov eax,DWORD PTR [esp+0x38]
804843c: 89 2c 24 mov DWORD PTR [esp],ebp
804843f: 89 44 24 08 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x8],eax
8048443: 8b 44 24 34 mov eax,DWORD PTR [esp+0x34]
8048447: 89 44 24 04 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x4],eax
804844b: ff 94 bb 08 ff ff ff call DWORD PTR [ebx+edi*4-0xf8]
8048452: 83 c7 01 add edi,0x1
8048455: 39 f7 cmp edi,esi
8048457: 75 df jne 8048438 <__libc_csu_init+0x38>
8048459: 83 c4 1c add esp,0x1c
804845c: 5b pop ebx
804845d: 5e pop esi
804845e: 5f pop edi
804845f: 5d pop ebp
8048460: c3 ret
8048461: eb 0d jmp 8048470 <__libc_csu_fini>
8048463: 90 nop
8048464: 90 nop
8048465: 90 nop
8048466: 90 nop
8048467: 90 nop
8048468: 90 nop
8048469: 90 nop
804846a: 90 nop
804846b: 90 nop
804846c: 90 nop
804846d: 90 nop
804846e: 90 nop
804846f: 90 nop
08048470 <__libc_csu_fini>:
8048470: f3 c3 repz ret
Disassembly of section .fini:
08048474 <_fini>:
8048474: 53 push ebx
8048475: 83 ec 08 sub esp,0x8
8048478: e8 a3 fe ff ff call 8048320 <__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx>
804847d: 81 c3 83 1b 00 00 add ebx,0x1b83
8048483: 83 c4 08 add esp,0x8
8048486: 5b pop ebx
8048487: c3 ret
下一步将上面的代码转换为01表示法。
如你所见。即使是简单的c程序也包含复杂的操作，代码的硬件越接近硬件。我希望我已经解释了为什么可执行文件比你想象的要大。如果您有任何疑问，请随时评论我的帖子。我会立即编辑我的答案。