我想在C#中使用动态对象进行简单的鸭子输入示例。在我看来,动态对象应该具有HasValue / HasProperty / HasMethod方法,其中包含一个字符串参数,用于在尝试对其运行之前查找的值,属性或方法的名称。我试图避免尝试/捕获块,如果可能的话,更深入的反射。在动态语言(JS,Ruby,Python等)中进行鸭子输入似乎是一种常见的做法,即在尝试使用它之前测试属性/方法,然后回退到默认值或抛出受控异常。下面的例子基本上就是我想要完成的事情。
如果上述方法不存在,是否有人有动态的预制扩展方法可以做到这一点?
示例:在JavaScript中,我可以非常轻松地测试对象上的方法。
//JavaScript
function quack(duck) {
if (duck && typeof duck.quack === "function") {
return duck.quack();
}
return null; //nothing to return, not a duck
}
我将如何在C#中做同样的事情?
//C# 4
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
//how do I test that the duck is not null,
//and has a quack method?
//if it doesn't quack, return null
}
答案 0 :(得分:13)
试试这个:
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
//...
public dynamic Quack(dynamic duck, int i)
{
Object obj = duck as Object;
if (duck != null)
{
//check if object has method Quack()
MethodInfo method = obj.GetType().GetMethods().
FirstOrDefault(x => x.Name == "Quack");
//if yes
if (method != null)
{
//invoke and return value
return method.Invoke((object)duck, null);
}
}
return null;
}
或者这个(仅使用动态):
public static dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
//invoke and return value
return duck.Quack();
}
//thrown if method call failed
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{
return null;
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:13)
如果您可以控制将动态使用的所有对象类型,另一个选项是强制它们从DynamicObject
类的子类继承,该类被定制为在方法时不会失败调用不存在:
快速而肮脏的版本看起来像这样:
public class DynamicAnimal : DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvokeMember(InvokeMemberBinder binder, object[] args, out object result)
{
bool success = base.TryInvokeMember(binder, args, out result);
// If the method didn't exist, ensure the result is null
if (!success) result = null;
// Always return true to avoid Exceptions being raised
return true;
}
}
然后您可以执行以下操作:
public class Duck : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Quack()
{
return "QUACK!";
}
}
public class Cow : DynamicAnimal
{
public string Moo()
{
return "Mooooo!";
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var duck = new Duck();
var cow = new Cow();
Console.WriteLine("Can a duck quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(duck));
Console.WriteLine("Can a cow quack?");
Console.WriteLine(DoQuack(cow));
Console.ReadKey();
}
public static string DoQuack(dynamic animal)
{
string result = animal.Quack();
return result ?? "... silence ...";
}
}
你的输出将是:
Can a duck quack?
QUACK!
Can a cow quack?
... silence ...
编辑:我应该注意,如果你能够使用这种方法并在DynamicObject
上构建,这就是冰山一角。如果你愿意,你可以编写像bool HasMember(string memberName)
这样的方法。
答案 2 :(得分:3)
为每个IDynamicMetaObjectProvider实现HasProperty方法,而不会抛出RuntimeBinderException。
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Dynamic;
using Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder;
using System.Linq.Expressions;
using System.Runtime.CompilerServices;
namespace DynamicCheckPropertyExistence
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
dynamic testDynamicObject = new ExpandoObject();
testDynamicObject.Name = "Testovaci vlastnost";
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Name"));
Console.WriteLine(HasProperty(testDynamicObject, "Id"));
Console.ReadLine();
}
private static bool HasProperty(IDynamicMetaObjectProvider dynamicProvider, string name)
{
var defaultBinder = Binder.GetMember(CSharpBinderFlags.None, name, typeof(Program),
new[]
{
CSharpArgumentInfo.Create(
CSharpArgumentInfoFlags.None, null)
}) as GetMemberBinder;
var callSite = CallSite<Func<CallSite, object, object>>.Create(new NoThrowGetBinderMember(name, false, defaultBinder));
var result = callSite.Target(callSite, dynamicProvider);
if (Object.ReferenceEquals(result, NoThrowExpressionVisitor.DUMMY_RESULT))
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
class NoThrowGetBinderMember : GetMemberBinder
{
private GetMemberBinder m_innerBinder;
public NoThrowGetBinderMember(string name, bool ignoreCase, GetMemberBinder innerBinder) : base(name, ignoreCase)
{
m_innerBinder = innerBinder;
}
public override DynamicMetaObject FallbackGetMember(DynamicMetaObject target, DynamicMetaObject errorSuggestion)
{
var retMetaObject = m_innerBinder.Bind(target, new DynamicMetaObject[] {});
var noThrowVisitor = new NoThrowExpressionVisitor();
var resultExpression = noThrowVisitor.Visit(retMetaObject.Expression);
var finalMetaObject = new DynamicMetaObject(resultExpression, retMetaObject.Restrictions);
return finalMetaObject;
}
}
class NoThrowExpressionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
public static readonly object DUMMY_RESULT = new DummyBindingResult();
public NoThrowExpressionVisitor()
{
}
protected override Expression VisitConditional(ConditionalExpression node)
{
if (node.IfFalse.NodeType != ExpressionType.Throw)
{
return base.VisitConditional(node);
}
Expression<Func<Object>> dummyFalseResult = () => DUMMY_RESULT;
var invokeDummyFalseResult = Expression.Invoke(dummyFalseResult, null);
return Expression.Condition(node.Test, node.IfTrue, invokeDummyFalseResult);
}
private class DummyBindingResult {}
}
}
答案 3 :(得分:2)
http://code.google.com/p/impromptu-interface/似乎是动态对象的一个很好的接口映射器...这比我希望的工作多一点,但似乎是所提出示例中最干净的实现...保持Simon的答案为正确,因为它仍然是我想要的最接近的,但Impromptu接口方法非常好。
答案 4 :(得分:1)
最短的路径是调用它,如果方法不存在则处理异常。我来自Python,这种方法在duck-typing中很常见,但我不知道它是否在C#4中广泛使用...
由于我的机器上没有VC 2010,我没有测试过自己
dynamic Quack(dynamic duck)
{
try
{
return duck.Quack();
}
catch (RuntimeBinderException)
{ return null; }
}