我被赋予了将SpringCache用于我们的一项服务以减少数据库查找次数的任务。在测试实现时,我注意到一些可缓存的操作是通过log-statements多次调用的。调查显示,如果在可缓存方法中调用可缓存操作,则根本不缓存嵌套操作。因此,稍后调用嵌套操作会导致进一步查找。
下面列出了一个描述问题的简单单元测试:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes = {SpringCacheTest.Config.class} )
@DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_CLASS)
public class SpringCacheTest {
private final static String CACHE_NAME = "testCache";
private final static Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MethodHandles.lookup().lookupClass());
private final static AtomicInteger methodInvocations = new AtomicInteger(0);
public interface ICacheableService {
String methodA(int length);
String methodB(String name);
}
@Resource
private ICacheableService cache;
@Test
public void testNestedCaching() {
String name = "test";
cache.methodB(name);
assertThat(methodInvocations.get(), is(equalTo(2)));
cache.methodA(name.length());
// should only be 2 as methodA for this length was already invoked before
assertThat(methodInvocations.get(), is(equalTo(3)));
}
@Configuration
public static class Config {
@Bean
public CacheManager getCacheManager() {
SimpleCacheManager cacheManager = new SimpleCacheManager();
cacheManager.setCaches(Arrays.asList(new ConcurrentMapCache(CACHE_NAME)));
return cacheManager;
}
@Bean
public ICacheableService getMockedEntityService() {
return new ICacheableService() {
private final Random random = new Random();
@Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#root.methodName.concat('_').concat(#p0)")
public String methodA(int length) {
methodInvocations.incrementAndGet();
LOG.debug("Invoking methodA");
char[] chars = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789".toCharArray();
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i=0; i<length; i++) {
sb.append(chars[random.nextInt(chars.length)]);
}
String result = sb.toString();
LOG.debug("Returning {} for length: {}", result, length);
return result;
}
@Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#root.methodName.concat('_').concat(#p0)")
public String methodB(String name) {
methodInvocations.incrementAndGet();
LOG.debug("Invoking methodB");
String rand = methodA(name.length());
String result = name+"_"+rand;
LOG.debug("Returning {} for name: {}", result, name);
return result;
}
};
}
}
}
两种方法的实际工作对于测试用例本身并不重要,因为只应测试缓存。
我以某种方式理解嵌套操作的结果没有被缓存的原因,但我想知道是否有可用的配置,我还没想到,为嵌套可缓存的返回值启用缓存操作
我知道通过重构并提供嵌套操作的返回值作为外部操作的参数将起作用,但因为这可能涉及更改一些操作(以及单元测试它们)配置或其他在我们的具体案例中,解决方法(如果可用)会更好。
答案 0 :(得分:7)
问题是您是直接从methodA
访问methodB
,因此这会阻止通过处理缓存机制的Java代理。此外,您没有添加@EnableCaching
注释,因此在您的测试中实际上根本没有缓存。
以下测试表明,如果您正确浏览Spring创建的代理,嵌套缓存模式将按预期工作:
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import javax.annotation.Resource;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.cache.CacheManager;
import org.springframework.cache.annotation.Cacheable;
import org.springframework.cache.annotation.EnableCaching;
import org.springframework.cache.concurrent.ConcurrentMapCache;
import org.springframework.cache.support.SimpleCacheManager;
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.test.annotation.DirtiesContext;
import org.springframework.test.context.ContextConfiguration;
import org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner;
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@ContextConfiguration(classes = { SpringCacheTest.Config.class })
@DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_CLASS)
public class SpringCacheTest {
private final static String CACHE_NAME = "testCache";
private final static AtomicInteger methodInvocations = new AtomicInteger(0);
public interface ICacheableService {
String methodA(int length);
String methodB(String name);
}
@Resource
private ICacheableService cache;
@Test
public void testNestedCaching() {
String name = "test";
cache.methodB(name);
assertEquals(methodInvocations.get(), 2);
cache.methodA(name.length());
// should only be 2 as methodA for this length was already invoked before
assertEquals(methodInvocations.get(), 2);
}
@Configuration
@EnableCaching
public static class Config {
@Bean
public CacheManager getCacheManager() {
SimpleCacheManager cacheManager = new SimpleCacheManager();
cacheManager.setCaches(Arrays.asList(new ConcurrentMapCache(CACHE_NAME)));
return cacheManager;
}
@Bean
public ICacheableService getMockedEntityService() {
return new ICacheableService() {
private final Random random = new Random();
@Autowired
ApplicationContext context;
@Override
@Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#root.methodName.concat('_').concat(#p0)")
public String methodA(int length) {
methodInvocations.incrementAndGet();
System.out.println("Invoking methodA");
char[] chars = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789".toCharArray();
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
sb.append(chars[random.nextInt(chars.length)]);
}
String result = sb.toString();
System.out.println("Returning " + result + " for length: " + length);
return result;
}
@Override
@Cacheable(value = CACHE_NAME, key = "#root.methodName.concat('_').concat(#p0)")
public String methodB(String name) {
methodInvocations.incrementAndGet();
System.out.println("Invoking methodB");
ICacheableService cache = context.getBean(ICacheableService.class);
String rand = cache.methodA(name.length());
String result = name + "_" + rand;
System.out.println("Returning " + result + " for name: " + name);
return result;
}
};
}
}
}