我有一个SimpleMessageListenerContainer,我正在使用RabbitMQ和Java。在大多数情况下,我没有遇到任何问题,但是在某些情况下,当消息被发送到队列时,似乎有一个异常导致SMLC进入循环尝试关闭然后重新启动队列。
[10/03/15 17:09:38:161 UTC] 00000246 SimpleMessage W org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer $ AsyncMessageProcessingConsumer 运行Consumer引发异常,如果处理可以重启 连接工厂支持它。例外摘要: org.springframework.amqp.AmqpIOException:java.io.IOException
[10/03/15 17:09:38:189 UTC] 00000246 SimpleMessage I org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer $ AsyncMessageProcessingConsumer run Restarting Consumer:tag = [null],channel = Cached Rabbit Channel: AMQChannel(AMQP://epa_devint1@xx.xx.xx.xx:5782 /,1), acknowledgeMode = AUTO本地队列大小= 0
[10/03/15 17:09:39:164 UTC] 00000256 SimpleMessage W org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer $ AsyncMessageProcessingConsumer 运行Consumer引发异常,如果处理可以重启 连接工厂支持它。例外摘要: com.rabbitmq.client.ShutdownSignalException:连接错误;原因: {#method(reply-code = 541,reply-text = INTERNAL_ERROR, class-id = 0,method-id = 0),null,“”}
当我通过管理界面从队列中删除邮件时,没有更多例外。
我认为异常的原因类似于缺少标题属性。
处理此异常的正确方法是什么,以便从队列中删除消息并退出关闭/重启逻辑?
public SimpleMessageListenerContainer createMessageListenerContainer(Object consumer, String exchangeName, String queueName, String routingKey) {
TopicExchange exchange = new TopicExchange(exchangeName);
Queue queue = new Queue(queueName,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_DURABLE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_EXCLUSIVE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_AUTO_DELETE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_ARGUMENTS);
amqpAdmin.declareExchange(exchange);
amqpAdmin.declareQueue(queue);
amqpAdmin.declareBinding(BindingBuilder.bind(queue).to(exchange).with(routingKey));
SimpleMessageListenerContainer container = new SimpleMessageListenerContainer(connectionFactory);
container.setQueues(queue);
container.setConcurrentConsumers(MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_CONCURRENT_CONSUMERS);
container.setErrorHandler(errorHandler);
container.setMessageListener(new MessageListenerAdapter(consumer, null));
container.setAcknowledgeMode(AcknowledgeMode.AUTO);
container.setAdviceChain(retryAdviceChainFactory.createRequestRequeueExceptionAwareRetryChain(MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_RETRY_ATTEMPTS));
container.setChannelTransacted(true);
container.setTaskExecutor(taskExecutor);
container.setTransactionManager(transactionManager);
return container;
}
@Override
public void afterPropertiesSet() {
com.rabbitmq.client.ConnectionFactory rabbitFactory = new com.rabbitmq.client.ConnectionFactory() {
protected void configureSocket(Socket socket) throws IOException {
super.configureSocket(socket);
socket.setSoTimeout(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQSocketTimeoutMS());
}
};
rabbitFactory.setConnectionTimeout(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQConnectionTimeoutMS());
rabbitFactory.setRequestedHeartbeat(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQRequestedHeartbeatInSeconds());
CachingConnectionFactory cachingFactory = new CachingConnectionFactory(rabbitFactory);
cachingFactory.setAddresses(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQHost());
cachingFactory.setPort(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQPort());
cachingFactory.setUsername(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQUsername());
cachingFactory.setPassword(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQPassword());
cachingFactory.setChannelCacheSize(propertiesHolder.getRabbitMQChannelCacheSize());
connectionFactory = cachingFactory;
retryAdviceChainFactory = new RetryAdviceChainFactory();
amqpAdmin = new RabbitAdmin(connectionFactory);
errorHandler = new ErrorHandler() {
@Override
public void handleError(Throwable e) {
LOG.error("Error occurred", e);
}
};
TopicExchange deadLetterExchange = new TopicExchange(MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_DEAD_LETTER_EXCHANGE);
Queue deadLetterQueue = new Queue(
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_DEAD_LETTER_QUEUE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_DURABLE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_EXCLUSIVE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_AUTO_DELETE,
MessagingConstants.RABBIT_MQ_QUEUE_ARGUMENTS);
amqpAdmin.declareExchange(deadLetterExchange);
amqpAdmin.declareQueue(deadLetterQueue);
amqpAdmin.declareBinding(BindingBuilder.bind(deadLetterQueue).to(deadLetterExchange).with("#"));
messageRecoverer = new DeadLetterMessageRecoverer(rabbitTemplate(), deadLetterExchange);
}
JDK:1.6
spring-rabbit:1.1.3。发布
spring-framework:3.2.1。发布
答案 0 :(得分:1)
您的问题是由邮件处理的事务性质引起的。我的意思是:
container.setTransactionManager(transactionManager);
正在发生的事情是,在某些情况下(可能是邮件标题的某些问题,正如您所建议的那样)您遇到了一些错误,而且没有正确处理。错误传播并到达txManager,而txManager依次为:
现在,当您遇到的问题不是您的消息的直接后果时,上述行为绝对有意义。我们假设您在处理邮件时遇到超时问题;应用程序在处理时关闭;在所有这些情况下,稍后重新传递消息或重新传递给另一个节点确实有意义。
在您的情况下,无论何时无关紧要哪个节点收到错误消息,您将遇到同样的问题,您需要手动删除该消息。为了避免这种情况,你可以:
以编程方式过滤掉无效消息,并且不会通过
将它们返回到队列中使用RabbitMQ功能根据您的要求处理错误