我正在努力使用http.core&客户4.3。一般来说,它运作良好,处理起来非常愉快。但是,我在其中一个转让中收到了ConnectionClosedException
,我看不出原因。就我所知,其他人工作得很好。
一切都以非常直接的方式遵循这些例子。如果没有,那就尽可能地重写,以便摆脱这种情况。
HttpClient
向B HttpService
收到“AX”帖子,处理HttpClient
在不同的端口向A发送回复“BR”(POST)
在问题场景中, A 作为服务器运行,B正在发送POST。对不起,它并不总是很清楚,因为在一个事务中,双方最终都运行服务器和客户端代码。
由于我不知道为什么会发生这种情况,我试图把我认为相关的一切都放在那里。我现在唯一的想法就是确保我添加/更改连接控制头有一些东西,但是我看不出它会如何影响任何东西。
来自机器“A”的堆栈跟踪,当来自B的回复
时org.apache.http.ConnectionClosedException: Client closed connection
at org.apache.http.impl.io.DefaultHttpRequestParser.parseHead(DefaultHttpRequestParser.java:133)
at org.apache.http.impl.io.DefaultHttpRequestParser.parseHead(DefaultHttpRequestParser.java:54)
at org.apache.http.impl.io.AbstractMessageParser.parse(AbstractMessageParser.java:260)
at org.apache.http.impl.DefaultBHttpServerConnection.receiveRequestHeader(DefaultBHttpServerConnection.java:131)
at org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.handleRequest(HttpService.java:307)
at com.me.HttpRequestHandlerThread.processConnection(HttpRequestHandlerThread.java:45)
at com.me.net.http.HttpRequestHandlerThread.run(HttpRequestHandlerThread.java:70)
com.me.ExceptionHolder: Client closed connection
at com.me.log.Log.logIdiocy(Log.java:77)
at com.me.log.Log.error(Log.java:54)
at com.me.net.http.HttpRequestHandlerThread.run(HttpRequestHandlerThread.java:72)
Caused by: org.apache.http.ConnectionClosedException: Client closed connection
at org.apache.http.impl.io.DefaultHttpRequestParser.parseHead(DefaultHttpRequestParser.java:133)
at org.apache.http.impl.io.DefaultHttpRequestParser.parseHead(DefaultHttpRequestParser.java:54)
at org.apache.http.impl.io.AbstractMessageParser.parse(AbstractMessageParser.java:260)
at org.apache.http.impl.DefaultBHttpServerConnection.receiveRequestHeader(DefaultBHttpServerConnection.java:131)
at org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.handleRequest(HttpService.java:307)
at com.me.net.http.HttpRequestHandlerThread.processConnection(HttpRequestHandlerThread.java:45)
at com.me.net.http.HttpRequestHandlerThread.run(HttpRequestHandlerThread.java:70)
这是在 B 上运行的代码,在此方案中为“客户端”。它正在尝试发送回复,确认已正确接收来自 A 的第一个POST。实际上没有太多要传输,响应应该只是HTTP 200:
try (CloseableHttpClient client = HttpClients.createDefault()) {
final HttpPost post = new HttpPost(url);
post.setHeaders(/* create application specific headers */);
ByteArrayEntity entity = new ByteArrayEntity(IOUtils.toByteArray(myStream));
post.setEntity(entity);
ResponseHandler<Void> responseHandler = new ResponseHandler<Void>() {
@Override
public Void handleResponse(HttpResponse response) throws ClientProtocolException, IOException {
StatusLine status = response.getStatusLine();
if (!NetUtil.isValidResponseCode(response)) {
throw new ClientProtocolException("Unexpected Error! Oops");
}
// consume the response, if there is one, so the connection will close properly
EntityUtils.consumeQuietly(response.getEntity());
return null;
}
};
try {
client.execute(post, responseHandler);
} catch (ClientProtocolException ex) {
// logic to queue a resend for 10 minutes later. not triggered
throw ex;
}
}
在 A 上:这称为异步,因为响应不会通过同一http连接进入。
主请求处理程序做了很多工作,但令人惊讶的是,在处理程序/服务器端实际控制HTTP的代码很少。伟大的图书馆...我不知何故误用了。这是实际的处理程序,一切都简化了一点,删除了验证等等。
public class AsyncReceiverHandler implements HttpRequestHandler {
@Override
public void handle(HttpRequest request, HttpResponse response, HttpContext context) throws HttpException, IOException {
// error if not post, other logic. not touching http. no errors
DefaultBHttpServerConnection connection = (DefaultBHttpServerConnection) context.getAttribute("connection");
Package pkg = NetUtil.createPackageFrom(connection); // just reads sender ip/port
NetUtil.copyHttpHeaders(request, pkg);
try {
switch (recieive(request, pkg)) {
case EH_OK:
response.setStatusCode(HttpStatus.SC_OK);
break;
case OHNOES_BAD_INPUT:
response.setStatusCode(HttpStatus.SC_BAD_REQUEST);
response.setEntity(new StringEntity("No MDN entity found in request body"));
// bunch of other cases, but are not triggered. xfer was a-ok
}
} catch (Exception ex) {
//log
}
}
private MyStatus receiveMdn(HttpRequest request, Package pkg) throws Exceptions..., IOException {
// validate request, get entity, make package, no issues
HttpEntity resEntity = ((HttpEntityEnclosingRequest) request).getEntity();
try {
byte[] data = EntityUtils.toByteArray(resEntity);
// package processing logic, validation, fairly quick, no errors thrown
} catch (Exceptions... ex) {
throw ExceptionHolder(ex);
}
}
}
这是请求处理程序线程。这个和服务器几乎是从样本中逐字记录的。服务处理程序只启动服务,accept()
是套接字。当它获得一个时,它会创建一个新副本,并调用start():
public HttpRequestHandlerThread(final HttpService httpService, final HttpServerConnection conn, HttpReceiverModule ownerModule) {
super();
this.httpService = httpService;
this.conn = (DefaultBHttpServerConnection) conn;
}
private void processConnection() throws IOException, HttpException {
while (!Thread.interrupted() && this.conn.isOpen()) {
/* have the service create a handler and pass it the processed request/response/context */
HttpContext context = new BasicHttpContext(null);
this.httpService.handleRequest(this.conn, context);
}
}
@Override
public void run() {
// just runs the main logic and reports exceptions.
try {
processConnection();
} catch (ConnectionClosedException ignored) {
// logs error here (and others).
} finally {
try { this.conn.shutdown(); } catch (IOException ignored) {}
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
嗯,现在这看起来很愚蠢,而且非常明显。我暂时忽略了这个问题,转而研究其他事情,并将答案从潜意识中冒出来,就像他们愿意一样。
我把这个标题添加回来,一切都清理完了:
post.setHeader("Connection", "close, TE")
以某种方式设置Connection
标题的行被删除了,可能是我不小心。它们中的很多都被设置了,它仍然存在,只是在这个代码路径中出错了。基本上,服务器希望此连接立即关闭,但标头恢复为默认keep-alive
。由于客户端在完成连接后立即关闭连接,这对于服务器来说是令人惊讶的,否则被告知,并且正确地说:D在反向路径中一切都很好。
由于我刚刚更改旧堆栈以使用HttpComponents
我没有看到标题等等,我只是假设我使用它错了。旧堆栈并不介意。