我看到了nhibernate缓存的一些奇怪的行为,无法理解推理。在执行
等选择操作时,我无法缓存查询query.Select(x=>x).ToList()
但可以在执行时缓存:
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
var p = query.ToList();
两者都产生相同的sql查询,应该做同样的事情。以下测试解释了问题。
[Test]
public void Can_Use_Cache()
{
ISessionFactory factory = Storage.Application.Get<ISessionFactory>("SessionFactory");
// initial hit on the database and load into cache - all fine
using (var session = factory.OpenSession())
{
Console.WriteLine("");
Console.WriteLine("First Query");
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
query.QueryOptions.SetCachable(true);
query.QueryOptions.SetCacheMode(CacheMode.Normal);
var p = query.ToList();
}
// no hit on the database and retrieved from cache as expected - all fine
using (var session = factory.OpenSession())
{
Console.WriteLine("");
Console.WriteLine("Second Query");
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
query.QueryOptions.SetCachable(true);
query.QueryOptions.SetCacheMode(CacheMode.Normal);
var p = query.ToList();
}
// hits the db - should have come from the cache - not working
using (var session = factory.OpenSession())
{
Console.WriteLine("");
Console.WriteLine("Third Query");
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
query.QueryOptions.SetCachable(true);
query.QueryOptions.SetCacheMode(CacheMode.Normal);
var p = query.Select(x=>x).ToList();
}
// hits the db again - should have come from the cache - again not working
using (var session = factory.OpenSession())
{
Console.WriteLine("");
Console.WriteLine("Fourth Query");
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
query.QueryOptions.SetCachable(true);
query.QueryOptions.SetCacheMode(CacheMode.Normal);
var p = query.Select(x => x).ToList();
}
}
我的测试结果显示第二个查询的数据库命中。查询3和4不应该命中db:
2010-02-28 12:05:23,046 INFO Started Logging
First Query
2010-02-28 12:05:23,156 DEBUG SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
Second Query
Third Query
2010-02-28 12:05:23,315 DEBUG SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
Fourth Query
2010-02-28 12:05:23,318 DEBUG SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
NHibernate: SELECT this_.Id as Id11_0_, this_.Version as Version11_0_, this_.Name as Name11_0_ FROM Promoters this_
使用流畅的配置缓存:
SessionFactory = Fluently.Configure()
.Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008
.ConnectionString(ConfigurationService.SqlConnectionString)
.ShowSql()
.Cache(c => c
.UseQueryCache()
.ProviderClass(typeof(NHibernate.Cache.HashtableCacheProvider).AssemblyQualifiedName))
)
.Mappings(m => m.FluentMappings.AddFromAssemblyOf<EventMap>()
.Conventions.Setup(MappingConventions.GetConventions()))
.ExposeConfiguration(BuildSchema)
.BuildSessionFactory();
答案 0 :(得分:2)
使用.Select()似乎是一个问题。选择(x =&gt; x)由于某种原因,使用select时会绕过缓存。任何其他语句都可以正常工作,如OrderBy(),Where()等
以下示例代码:
using (var session = factory.OpenSession())
{
Console.WriteLine("");
var query = session.Linq<Promoter>();
query.QueryOptions.SetCachable(true);
query.QueryOptions.SetCacheMode(CacheMode.Normal);
var p = query.OrderBy(x => x.Name).ToList();// works fine
//var p = query.OrderBy(x => x.Name).Select(x=>x).ToList();// will hit the db
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)