所以
public var user:Object = {};
user["firstName"] = "Bill";
user["lastName"] = "Cosby";
比我有像User这样的值对象慢吗?
var user:User = new User();
user.firstName = "Bill";
user.lastName = "Cosby";
答案 0 :(得分:6)
比任何速度优势更重要的是,强类型提供了编译时类型检查,因此您不会输入错误的属性名称 - 节省了大量的开发人员时间,这比时钟周期贵得多
尽管如此,静态打字确实也带来了速度优势。
答案 1 :(得分:6)
public function speedTest():void
{
var typedObjects:Array = [];
var dynamicObjects:Array = [];
var typedObject:User;
var dynamicObject:Object;
var i:int = 0;
var n:int = 10000;
for (i; i < n; i++)
{
dynamicObject = {};
dynamicObjects.push(dynamicObject);
typedObject = new User();
typedObjects.push(typedObject);
}
// typed
var time:int = getTimer();
i = 0;
n = 10000;
for (i; i < n; i++)
{
typedObject = typedObjects[i];
typedObject.firstName = "Bill";
typedObject.lastName = "Cosby";
}
var end:int = getTimer() - time;
trace("TypedObject Time: ", end/1000, "sec");
// untyped
time = getTimer();
i = 0;
n = 10000;
for (i; i < n; i++)
{
dynamicObject = dynamicObjects[i];
dynamicObject["firstName"] = "Bill";
dynamicObject["lastName"] = "Cosby";
}
end = getTimer() - time;
trace("DynamicObject Time: ", end/1000, "sec");
}
简单速度测试显示TypedObject(User
)比UntypedObject({}
)大约快3-3.5倍,但是在日常生活中你没有注意到它。试试Grant Skinner's Performance Test Harness来运行一些更好/更高级的测试:)。
3个简单的试运行:
TypedObject Time: 0.002 sec
DynamicObject Time: 0.007 sec
TypedObject Time: 0.002 sec
DynamicObject Time: 0.006 sec
TypedObject Time: 0.002 sec
DynamicObject Time: 0.006 sec
结论:Typed比Untyped快。