我正在尝试建立一个优雅地将数据库操作推迟到单独线程的系统,以避免在Twisted回调期间阻塞。
到目前为止,这是我的方法:
from contextlib import contextmanager
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import scoped_session, sessionmaker
from twisted.internet.threads import deferToThread
_engine = create_engine(initialization_string)
Session = scoped_session(sessionmaker(bind=_engine))
@contextmanager
def transaction_context():
session = Session()
try:
yield session
session.commit()
except:
# No need to do session.rollback(). session.remove will do it.
raise
finally:
session.remove()
def threaded(fn):
@wraps(fn)
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
return deferToThread(fn, *args, **kwargs)
return wrapper
这应该允许我用threaded
装饰器包装一个函数,然后在所述函数体中使用transaction_context
上下文管理器。以下是一个例子:
from __future__ import print_function
from my_lib.orm import User, transaction_context, threaded
from twisted.internet import reactor
@threaded
def get_n_users(n):
with transaction_context() as session:
return session.query(User).limit(n).all()
if __name__ == '__main__':
get_n_users(n).addBoth(len)
reactor.run()
但是,当我运行上面的脚本时,我得到一个包含以下回溯的失败:
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 781, in __bootstrap
self.__bootstrap_inner()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 808, in __bootstrap_inner
self.run()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/threading.py", line 761, in run
self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs)
--- <exception caught here> ---
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/threadpool.py", line 191, in _worker
result = context.call(ctx, function, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 118, in callWithContext
return self.currentContext().callWithContext(ctx, func, *args, **kw)
File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/python/context.py", line 81, in callWithContext
return func(*args,**kw)
File "testaccess.py", line 9, in get_n_users
return session.query(User).limit(n).all()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/contextlib.py", line 24, in __exit__
self.gen.next()
File "/home/louis/Documents/Python/knacki/knacki/db.py", line 36, in transaction_context
session.remove()
exceptions.AttributeError: 'Session' object has no attribute 'remove'
我根本没想到这一点。我错过了什么?我没有正确地实例化scoped_session
吗?
修改: Here是关于将此设置与Twisted集成的相关问题。它可能有助于澄清我正在努力实现的目标。
答案 0 :(得分:11)
简短回答
在.remove()
上致电Session
,而不是session
。
答案很长:
scoped_session
并没有真正返回Session
课程。相反,它创建了一个对象,它关注它所调用的线程。调用它将返回与该线程关联的现有Session
实例或关联新线程并返回该实例。 thread local是线程与会话关联的原因。
remove
对象上的scoped_session
方法删除当前与其调用的线程关联的会话对象。这意味着它与scoped_session.__call__
相反,这是一种令人困惑的API。
这是一个简短的Python脚本来说明行为。
import threading
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import scoped_session, sessionmaker
_engine = create_engine('sqlite:///:memory:')
Session = scoped_session(sessionmaker(_engine))
def scoped_session_demo(remove=False):
ids = []
def push_ids():
thread_name = threading.currentThread().getName()
data = [thread_name]
data.append(Session())
if remove:
Session.remove()
data.append(Session())
ids.append(data)
t = threading.Thread(target=push_ids)
t.start()
t.join()
push_ids()
sub_thread, main_thread = ids
sub_name, sub_session_a, sub_session_b = sub_thread
main_name, main_session_a, main_session_b = main_thread
print sub_name, sub_session_a == sub_session_b
print main_name, main_session_a == main_session_b
print sub_name, '==', main_name, sub_session_a == main_session_b
print 'Without remove:'
scoped_session_demo()
print 'With remove:'
scoped_session_demo(True)
其输出:
Without remove:
Thread-1 True
MainThread True
Thread-1 == MainThread False
With remove:
Thread-2 False
MainThread False
Thread-2 == MainThread False