我正在尝试实现跳过列表,但是我遇到了插入部分的问题。 Valgrind在第44行给出了无效的大小4读数,这是这一行:
while(node->next_pointers[i] != NULL && node->next_pointers[i]->value < value)
这是节点 - &gt; next_pointers [i]给出它。
void insert_to_skip_list(SkipList *skip_list, int value) {
SkipListNode* updated[skip_list->max_level + 1];
SkipListNode* node = skip_list->header;
int i;
for(i = skip_list->max_level;i >=0; i--) {
while(node->next_pointers[i] != NULL && node->next_pointers[i]->value < value) {
node = node->next_pointers[i];
}
updated[i] = node;
}
node = node->next_pointers[0];
if(node->value == value) {
return;
}else {
int level = decide_level(skip_list->max_level);
if(level > skip_list->max_level) {
level = skip_list->max_level + 1;
skip_list->max_level = level;
updated[level] = skip_list->header;
}
node->levels = level;
node->value = value;
for(i = 0; i <= skip_list->max_level; i++) {
node->next_pointers[i] = updated[i]->next_pointers[i];
updated[i]->next_pointers[i] = node;
}
}
}
以下是我的结构:
typedef struct skiplistNode {
int value;
int levels;
struct skiplistNode **next_pointers;
struct skiplistNode **prev_pointers;
} SkipListNode;
typedef struct {
int max_level;
SkipListNode *header;
} SkipList;
这是我得到的valgrind痕迹:
==5746== Invalid read of size 4
==5746== at 0x804B56D: insert_to_skip_list (skiplist.c:44)
==5746== by 0x404A7DA: srunner_run (check_run.c:396)
==5746== by 0x404A892: srunner_run_all (check_run.c:587)
==5746== Address 0x4256c34 is 0 bytes after a block of size 12 alloc'd
==5746== at 0x402CE68: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-x86-linux.so)
==5746== by 0x404A7DA: srunner_run (check_run.c:396)
==5746== by 0x404A892: srunner_run_all (check_run.c:587)
==5746== Invalid read of size 4
==5746== at 0x804B5AE: insert_to_skip_list (skiplist.c:50)
==5746== by 0x404A7DA: srunner_run (check_run.c:396)
==5746== by 0x404A892: srunner_run_all (check_run.c:587)
==5746== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==5746==
==5746==
==5746== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==5746== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==5746== at 0x804B5AE: insert_to_skip_list (skiplist.c:50)
==5746== by 0x404A7DA: srunner_run (check_run.c:396)
==5746== by 0x404A892: srunner_run_all (check_run.c:587)
==5746== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==5746== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==5746== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==5746== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==5746== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==5746==
==5746== HEAP SUMMARY:
==5746== in use at exit: 3,542 bytes in 196 blocks
==5746== total heap usage: 260 allocs, 64 frees, 39,914 bytes allocated
==5746==
==5746== LEAK SUMMARY:
==5746== definitely lost: 12 bytes in 1 blocks
==5746== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==5746== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==5746== still reachable: 3,530 bytes in 195 blocks
==5746== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==5746== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==5746==
==5746== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==5746== Use --track-origins=yes to see where uninitialised values come from
==5746== ERROR SUMMARY: 6 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
修改 我得到了jlcin,但我现在仍然遇到了这个问题。
代码现在是:
SkipListNode* updated[skip_list->max_level + 1];
SkipListNode* node = skip_list->header;
int i;
for(i = skip_list->max_level - 1; i >=0; i--) {
while(node->next_pointers[i] != NULL && value > node->next_pointers[i]->value) {
node = node->next_pointers[i];
}
updated[i] = node;
}
if(node->next_pointers[0] != NULL && node->next_pointers[0]->value == value) {
return;
}else {
int level = decide_level(skip_list->max_level);
if(level > skip_list->max_level) {
level = skip_list->max_level + 1;
skip_list->max_level = level;
updated[level] = skip_list->header;
}
for(i = skip_list->max_level -1; i >=0; i--) {
node->next_pointers[i] = updated[i]->next_pointers[i];
updated[i]->next_pointers[i] = node;
}
}
和valgrind:
==8844== Invalid write of size 4 ==8844== at 0x804B6D8: insert_to_skip_list (skiplist.c:59)
该行是:
node->next_pointers[i] = updated[i]->next_pointers[i];
再次感谢!
答案 0 :(得分:4)
我看到一个一个错误,你可以找到
SkipListNode* updated[skip_list->max_level + 1];
和
int level = decide_level(skip_list->max_level);
if(level > skip_list->max_level) {
level = skip_list->max_level + 1;
skip_list->max_level = level;
updated[level] = skip_list->header;
}
在声明中,updated
数组只有0到max_level
索引,并且完全具有max_level+1
个元素。但在代码level = skip_list->max_level + 1;
中,level
的值为max_level+1
,这是数组的错误索引。
我不知道skip_list->max_level
的确切含义。它是next_pointers
的最大索引还是最大大小?
for(i = skip_list->max_level;i >=0; i--)
while(node->next_pointers[i]
如果它是最大大小,则表示next_pointers只有索引0到max_level-1
,因此next_pointers[i]
i = skip_list->max_level
我认为49 node = node->next_pointers[0];
50 if(node->value == value)
是错误的索引。
第50行的错误
node
(NULL)->value
指针为NULL并且尝试获取{{1}}无效并导致段错误。