我正在尝试使用C#打印1到100之间的数字而不使用循环。有线索吗?
答案 0 :(得分:199)
没有循环,没有条件,也没有硬编码的文字输出,又称“分而治之FTW”解决方案:
class P
{
static int n;
static void P1() { System.Console.WriteLine(++n); }
static void P2() { P1(); P1(); }
static void P4() { P2(); P2(); }
static void P8() { P4(); P4(); }
static void P16() { P8(); P8(); }
static void P32() { P16(); P16(); }
static void P64() { P32(); P32(); }
static void Main() { P64(); P32(); P4(); }
}
替代方法:
using System;
class C
{
static int n;
static void P() { Console.WriteLine(++n); }
static void X2(Action a) { a(); a(); }
static void X5(Action a) { X2(a); X2(a); a(); }
static void Main() { X2(() => X5(() => X2(() => X5(P)))); }
}
答案 1 :(得分:66)
Console.Out.WriteLine('1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100');
答案 2 :(得分:57)
可能是递归?
public static void PrintNext(i) {
if (i <= 100) {
Console.Write(i + " ");
PrintNext(i + 1);
}
}
public static void Main() {
PrintNext(1);
}
答案 3 :(得分:43)
还有一个:
Console.WriteLine(
String.Join(
", ",
Array.ConvertAll<int, string>(
Enumerable.Range(1, 100).ToArray(),
i => i.ToString()
)
)
);
答案 4 :(得分:14)
using static IronRuby.Ruby;
class Print1To100WithoutLoopsDemo
{
static void Main() =>
CreateEngine().Execute("(1..100).each {|i| System::Console.write_line i }");
}
嘿,为什么不呢?
答案 5 :(得分:12)
Console.WriteLine('1');
Console.WriteLine('2');
...
Console.WriteLine('100');
...或者您会接受递归解决方案吗?
编辑:或者你可以这样做并使用变量:
int x = 1;
Console.WriteLine(x);
x+=1;
Console.WriteLine('2');
x+=1;
...
x+=1
Console.WriteLine('100');
答案 6 :(得分:12)
Enumerable.Range(1, 100)
.Select(i => i.ToString())
.ToList()
.ForEach(s => Console.WriteLine(s));
不确定这是否算是因为循环是隐藏的,但如果它是合法的,那么它就是问题的惯用解决方案。否则你可以这样做。
int count = 1;
top:
if (count > 100) { goto bottom; }
Console.WriteLine(count++);
goto top;
bottom:
当然,这实际上是一个循环将被翻译成什么但是这些天写这样的代码肯定不赞成。
答案 7 :(得分:8)
只是为了丑陋的字面解释:
Console.WriteLine("numbers from 1 to 100 without using loops, ");
(你现在或以后可以笑或不笑)
答案 8 :(得分:8)
没有循环,没有递归,只是一个类似哈希表的函数数组来选择如何分支:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace Juliet
{
class PrintStateMachine
{
int state;
int max;
Action<Action>[] actions;
public PrintStateMachine(int max)
{
this.state = 0;
this.max = max;
this.actions = new Action<Action>[] { IncrPrint, Stop };
}
void IncrPrint(Action next)
{
Console.WriteLine(++state);
next();
}
void Stop(Action next) { }
public void Start()
{
Action<Action> action = actions[Math.Sign(state - max) + 1];
action(Start);
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
PrintStateMachine printer = new PrintStateMachine(100);
printer.Start();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
答案 9 :(得分:8)
Enumerable.Range(1, 100).ToList().ForEach(i => Console.WriteLine(i));
以下是上述代码中发生的情况的细分:
效果考虑
ToList调用将导致为所有项目分配内存(在上面的示例中为100个int)。这意味着O(N)空间复杂性。如果这是你的应用程序中的一个问题,即如果整数范围可能非常高,那么你应该避免ToList并直接枚举这些项目。
不幸的是,ForEach不是开箱即用的IEnumerable扩展的一部分(因此需要在上面的例子中转换为List)。幸运的是,这很容易创建:
static class EnumerableExtensions
{
public static void ForEach<T>(this IEnumerable<T> items, Action<T> func)
{
foreach (T item in items)
{
func(item);
}
}
}
使用上面的IEnumerable扩展,现在在需要将操作应用于IEnumerable的所有地方,您只需使用lambda调用ForEach即可。所以现在原始示例如下所示:
Enumerable.Range(1, 100).ForEach(i => Console.WriteLine(i));
唯一的区别是我们不再调用ToList,这会导致常量(O(1))空间使用...如果您处理的是大量项目,这将是一个非常明显的收益。
答案 10 :(得分:8)
当我回答这个问题时,有人已经拥有它了,所以无论如何它都归功于Caleb:
void Main()
{
print(0, 100);
}
public void print(int x, int limit)
{
Console.WriteLine(++x);
if(x != limit)
print(x, limit);
}
答案 11 :(得分:7)
我可以想到两种方式。其中一个涉及大约100行代码!
还有另一种方法可以多次重复使用一些代码而不使用while / for循环...
提示:创建一个打印从1到N的数字的函数。应该很容易使其适用于N = 1.然后考虑如何使其适用于N = 2.
答案 12 :(得分:7)
使用正则表达式
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
public class Hello1
{
public static void Main()
{
// Count to 128 in unary
string numbers = "x\n";
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "x$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xx$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xxxx$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xxxxxxxx$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx$&");
numbers += Regex.Replace(numbers, "x+\n", "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx$&");
// Out of 1..128, select 1..100
numbers = Regex.Match(numbers, "(.*\n){100}").Value;
// Convert from unary to decimal
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{10}", "<10>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{9}", "<9>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{8}", "<8>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{7}", "<7>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{6}", "<6>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{5}", "<5>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{4}", "<4>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{3}", "<3>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{2}", "<2>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "x{1}", "<1>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){10}", "<100>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){9}", "<90>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){8}", "<80>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){7}", "<70>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){6}", "<60>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){5}", "<50>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){4}", "<40>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){3}", "<30>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<10>){2}", "<20>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<[0-9]{3}>)$", "$1<00>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "(<[0-9]{2}>)$", "$1<0>");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "<([0-9]0)>\n", "$1\n");
numbers = Regex.Replace(numbers, "<([0-9])0*>", "$1");
System.Console.WriteLine(numbers);
}
}
输出:
# => 1
# => 2
# ...
# => 99
# => 100
答案 13 :(得分:5)
方法A:
Console.WriteLine('1');
Console.WriteLine('print 2');
Console.WriteLine('print 3');
...
Console.WriteLine('print 100');
方法B:
func x (int j)
{
Console.WriteLine(j);
if (j < 100)
x (j+1);
}
x(1);
答案 14 :(得分:5)
只是LINQ吧......
Console.WriteLine(Enumerable.Range(1, 100)
.Select(s => s.ToString())
.Aggregate((x, y) => x + "," + y));
答案 15 :(得分:2)
我可以想到两种方式:
Console.WriteLine
goto
声明中使用switch
答案 16 :(得分:2)
完全不必要的方法:
int i = 1;
System.Timers.Timer t = new System.Timers.Timer(1);
t.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(
(sender, e) => { if (i > 100) t.Enabled = false; else Console.WriteLine(i++); });
t.Enabled = true;
Thread.Sleep(110);
答案 17 :(得分:1)
public void Main()
{
printNumber(1);
}
private void printNumber(int x)
{
Console.WriteLine(x.ToString());
if(x<101)
{
x+=1;
printNumber(x);
}
}
答案 18 :(得分:1)
酷炫有趣的方式:
static void F(int[] array, int n)
{
Console.WriteLine(array[n] = n);
F(array, n + 1);
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
try { F(new int[101], 1); }
catch (Exception e) { }
}
答案 19 :(得分:1)
class Program
{
static int temp = 0;
public static int a()
{
temp = temp + 1;
if (temp == 100)
{
Console.WriteLine(temp);
return 0;
}
else
Console.WriteLine(temp);
Program.a();
return 0;
}
public static void Main()
{
Program.a();
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
答案 20 :(得分:0)
namespace ConsoleApplication2 {
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
Print(Enumerable.Range(1, 100).ToList(), 0);
Console.ReadKey();
}
public static void Print(List<int> numbers, int currentPosition) {
Console.WriteLine(numbers[currentPosition]);
if (currentPosition < numbers.Count - 1) {
Print(numbers, currentPosition + 1);
}
}
}
}
答案 21 :(得分:0)
PrintNum(1);
private void PrintNum(int i)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0}", i);
if(i < 100)
{
PrintNum(i+1);
}
}
答案 22 :(得分:0)
这或多或少的伪代码我多年没做过c#,PS在1小时的睡眠中运行所以我可能错了。
int i = 0;
public void printNum(j){
if(j > 100){
break;
} else {
print(j);
printNum(j + 1);
}
}
public void main(){
print(i);
printNum(i + 1);
}
答案 23 :(得分:0)
我的解决方案是在线程2045637中,它询问Java的相同问题。
答案 24 :(得分:0)
class Program
{
static Timer s = new Timer();
static int i = 0;
static void Main(string[] args)
{
s.Elapsed += Restart;
s.Start();
Console.ReadLine();
}
static void Restart(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
{
s.Dispose();
if (i < 100)
{
Console.WriteLine(++i);
s = new Timer(1);
s.Elapsed += Restart;
s.Start();
}
}
}
你必须注意到我不使用递归。
答案 25 :(得分:0)
对此发布感到有些调皮:
private static void Main()
{
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FirstChanceException += (s, e) =>
{
var frames = new StackTrace().GetFrames();
Console.Write($"{frames.Length - 2} ");
var frame = frames[101];
};
throw new Exception();
}
答案 26 :(得分:0)
[Test]
public void PrintNumbersNoLoopOrRecursionTest()
{
var numberContext = new NumberContext(100);
numberContext.OnNumberChange += OnNumberChange(numberContext);
numberContext.CurrentNumber = 1;
}
OnNumberChangeHandler OnNumberChange(NumberContext numberContext)
{
return (o, args) =>
{
if (args.Counter > numberContext.LastNumber)
return;
Console.WriteLine(numberContext.CurrentNumber);
args.Counter += 1;
numberContext.CurrentNumber = args.Counter;
};
}
public delegate void OnNumberChangeHandler(object source, OnNumberChangeEventArgs e);
public class NumberContext
{
public NumberContext(int lastNumber)
{
LastNumber = lastNumber;
}
public event OnNumberChangeHandler OnNumberChange;
private int currentNumber;
public int CurrentNumber
{
get { return currentNumber; }
set {
currentNumber = value;
OnNumberChange(this, new OnNumberChangeEventArgs(value));
}
}
public int LastNumber { get; set; }
public class OnNumberChangeEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public OnNumberChangeEventArgs(int counter)
{
Counter = counter;
}
public int Counter { get; set; }
}
答案 27 :(得分:0)
static void Main(string[] args)
{
print(0);
}
public static void print(int i)
{
if (i >= 0 && i<=10)
{
i = i + 1;
Console.WriteLine(i + " ");
print(i);
}
}