我有一个可以自动化用户的Automator类。我在Windows中设置系统剪贴板时遇到问题。 Automator类使用ClipSetThread类，它是一个设置系统剪贴板的线程。 ClipSetThread的一个实例将一个线程作为输入，如果为null，则它与之连接（等待它完成）。
我觉得我没有正确调用ClipSetThread因为我之前仍然存在其可靠性方面的错误;在ClipSetThread之前。此代码在运行时不会抛出任何错误，但它的工作时间约为2/3。其他时候它会打印1134，_234等。似乎线程没有相互连接（等待），或者被跳过。
代码：
import java.awt.AWTException;
import java.awt.Robot;
import java.awt.event.KeyEvent;
import org.jnativehook.GlobalScreen;
import org.jnativehook.NativeHookException;
import org.jnativehook.mouse.NativeMouseEvent;
import org.jnativehook.mouse.NativeMouseInputListener;
public class Automator extends Thread implements NativeMouseInputListener
{
Robot rob = null;
TheAppClass theApp = null;
ClipSetThread lastClipSet = null;
boolean doit = false;
boolean settingClip = false;
public void run()
{
try // to make the Global hook
{
GlobalScreen.registerNativeHook();
}
catch (NativeHookException ex){theApp.updateOutput("No Global Keyboard or Mouse Hook");return;}
try // to create a robot (can simulate user input such as mouse and keyboard input)
{
rob = new Robot();
}
catch (AWTException e1) {theApp.updateOutput("The Robot could not be created");return;}
while(true) {}
}
public void setApp(TheAppClass app)
{
theApp = app;
theApp.updateOutput("Succesfully started automator");
}
public void setClip(String arg)
{
ClipSetThread set = new ClipSetThread(theApp, lastClipSet);
lastClipSet = set;
set.setClip(arg);
}
public void DOit()
{
theApp.updateOutput("Starting");
pasteAtCursorLocation("1");
tab(1);
pasteAtCursorLocation("2");
tab(1);
pasteAtCursorLocation("3");
tab(1);
pasteAtCursorLocation("4");
tab(1);
theApp.updateOutput("Complete");
}
public void nativeMouseReleased(NativeMouseEvent e)
{
//System.out.println("Mouse Released: " + e.getButton());
if(doit)
{
DOit();
doit = false;
}
}
public void pasteAtCursorLocation(String text)
{
setClip(text);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
theApp.updateOutput("Simulated Paste");
}
public void tab(int numTimes)
{
while(numTimes > 0)
{
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_TAB);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_TAB);
numTimes--;
theApp.updateOutput("Simulated Tab");
}
}
// Unimplemented
public void nativeMouseClicked(NativeMouseEvent arg0) {}
public void nativeMousePressed(NativeMouseEvent arg0) {}
public void nativeMouseDragged(NativeMouseEvent arg0) {}
public void nativeMouseMoved(NativeMouseEvent arg0) {}
}
ClipSetThread：
import java.awt.Toolkit;
import java.awt.datatransfer.Clipboard;
import java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor;
import java.awt.datatransfer.StringSelection;
import java.awt.datatransfer.Transferable;
public class ClipSetThread extends Thread
{
Clipboard sysClip = null;
TheAppClass theApp = null;
public ClipSetThread(TheAppClass app, Thread waitFor)
{
theApp = app;
sysClip = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemClipboard();
if(waitFor != null)
{try {waitFor.join();}catch (InterruptedException e) {}}
}
public void setClip(String arg)
{
// Two strings that will hopefully never be on the clipboard
String checkStr1 = "9999999999999";
String checkStr2 = "99999999999999";
// When we read in the clipboard we want to see if we change these strings from the ones they
// will never be, if they do change we read the clipboard successfully
String clipBoardTextBefore = checkStr1;
String clipBoardTextAfter = checkStr2;
// First get a copy of the current system clipboard text
while(true)
{
try
{
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextBefore = (String)contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
try {Thread.sleep(20);} catch (InterruptedException e1) {}
continue;
}
break;
}
// If we failed to change the string it means we failed to read the text
if(clipBoardTextBefore.equals(checkStr1))
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT get sysClip text");
else
{
// If we didn't failed to get the current text try to change it
while(true)
{
try{sysClip.setContents(new StringSelection(arg), null);}
catch(Exception e)
{
try {Thread.sleep(20);} catch (InterruptedException e1) {}
continue;
}
break;
}
// Now again check to see the clipboard text
while(true)
{
try
{
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextAfter = (String)contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
try {Thread.sleep(20);} catch (InterruptedException e1) {}
continue;
}
break;
}
// If we failed to read the clipboard text
if(clipBoardTextAfter.equals(checkStr2))
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT check if sysClip update was successful");
else
{ // We re-read the clipboard text, see if it changed from the original clipboard text
if(clipBoardTextAfter.equals(checkStr1))
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT successfully set clipboard text");
else
theApp.updateOutput("Set Clipboard Text:" + arg + "\n");
}
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分：2)
首先，您永远不会在start上致电ClipSetThread。您还应该在加入之前检查线程是否仍然存在。
public class ClipSetThread extends Thread {
Clipboard sysClip = null;
TheAppClass theApp = null;
private String toClipboard;
public ClipSetThread(TheAppClass app, Thread waitFor, String toClipBoard) {
theApp = app;
sysClip = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemClipboard();
this.toClipboard = toClipBoard;
// !! Check to see if the thread is also alive before trying to join with it...
if (waitFor != null && waitFor.isAlive()) {
try {
waitFor.join();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
}
}
// You should really put your logic into the `run` method in order to allow
// the code to actually run in a separate thread...otherwise there is no
// point in using a thread....
@Override
public void run() {
// Two strings that will hopefully never be on the clipboard
String checkStr1 = "9999999999999";
String checkStr2 = "99999999999999";
// When we read in the clipboard we want to see if we change these strings from the ones they
// will never be, if they do change we read the clipboard successfully
String clipBoardTextBefore = checkStr1;
String clipBoardTextAfter = checkStr2;
// First get a copy of the current system clipboard text
while (true) {
try {
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextBefore = (String) contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Thread.sleep(20);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
}
continue;
}
break;
}
// If we failed to change the string it means we failed to read the text
if (clipBoardTextBefore.equals(checkStr1)) {
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT get sysClip text");
} else {
// If we didn't failed to get the current text try to change it
while (true) {
try {
sysClip.setContents(new StringSelection(toClipboard), null);
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Thread.sleep(20);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
}
continue;
}
break;
}
// Now again check to see the clipboard text
while (true) {
try {
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextAfter = (String) contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
} catch (Exception e) {
try {
Thread.sleep(20);
} catch (InterruptedException e1) {
}
continue;
}
break;
}
// If we failed to read the clipboard text
if (clipBoardTextAfter.equals(checkStr2)) {
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT check if sysClip update was successful");
} else { // We re-read the clipboard text, see if it changed from the original clipboard text
if (clipBoardTextAfter.equals(checkStr1)) {
theApp.updateOutput("Could NOT successfully set clipboard text");
} else {
theApp.updateOutput("Set Clipboard Text:" + toClipboard + "\n");
}
}
}
}
}
根据我们之前的转换，使用while (true) {}是危险的，这也是浪费，因为它会不必要地消耗CPU周期......
public class Automator extends Thread implements NativeMouseInputListener {
// A "locking" object...
private static final Object WAIT_LOCK = new Object();
Robot rob = null;
TheAppClass theApp = null;
ClipSetThread lastClipSet = null;
boolean doit = false;
boolean settingClip = false;
public void run() {
try // to make the Global hook
{
GlobalScreen.registerNativeHook();
} catch (NativeHookException ex) {
theApp.updateOutput("No Global Keyboard or Mouse Hook");
return;
}
try // to create a robot (can simulate user input such as mouse and keyboard input)
{
rob = new Robot();
} catch (AWTException e1) {
theApp.updateOutput("The Robot could not be created");
return;
}
// This is wasteful...
// while (true) {
// }
// Locks do not consume CPU cycles while in the wait state...
synchronized (WAIT_LOCK) {
try {
WAIT_LOCK.wait();
} catch (Exception exp) {
}
}
}
public void dispose() {
// Tell the thread it can terminate...
synchronized (WAIT_LOCK) {
WAIT_LOCK.notify();
}
// This will STOP the current thread (which called this method)
// while the lastClipSet finishes...
if (lastClipSet != null && lastClipSet.isAlive()) {
lastClipSet.join();
}
}
public void setClip(String arg) {
ClipSetThread set = new ClipSetThread(theApp, lastClipSet, arg);
lastClipSet = set;
// You MUST START the thread...
set.start();
}
/*...*/
}
<强>更新
此代码可能会产生无限循环。如果剪贴板不包含String值
while(true)
{
try
{
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextBefore = (String)contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
try {Thread.sleep(20);} catch (InterruptedException e1) {}
continue;
}
break;
}
你倾向于这么做。我可能会建议您提供某种“转义”机制，以允许它在多次重试后失败...
boolean successful = false;
int retries = 0;
while (!successful && retries < 20) {
{
try
{
Transferable contents = sysClip.getContents(null);
clipBoardTextBefore = (String)contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
successful = true;
}
catch(Exception e)
{
retries++;
try {Thread.sleep(20);} catch (InterruptedException e1) {}
}
}
更新了工作示例
好的，这很有趣。我把一个（简单的）工作示例放在一起。您将需要打开某种文本编辑器。运行程序时，您有5秒钟的时间将其激活;）
我所做的唯一基本改变是我在250毫秒的事件之间添加了一个自动延迟（参见rob.setAutoDelay(250)。
现在，您也可以使用Robot#delay在每个关键事件之间设置延迟，但这取决于您
public class Engine extends Thread {
private Robot rob = null;
private PasteThread lastClipSet = null;
public void setClip(String arg) {
if (lastClipSet != null && lastClipSet.isAlive()) {
try {
lastClipSet.join();
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
ex.printStackTrace();
}
}
PasteThread set = new PasteThread(arg);
lastClipSet = set;
lastClipSet.start();
}
public void pasteAtCursorLocation(String text) {
System.out.println("Paste " + text);
setClip(text);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
}
public Engine() throws AWTException {
rob = new Robot();
rob.setAutoDelay(250);
try {
Thread.sleep(5000);
} catch (InterruptedException ex) {
}
pasteAtCursorLocation("This is a simple test, thanks for watching!");
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
try {
new Engine();
} catch (AWTException ex) {
Logger.getLogger(Engine.class.getName()).log(Level.SEVERE, null, ex);
}
}
public class PasteThread extends Thread {
private String toPaste;
public PasteThread(String value) {
toPaste = value;
}
@Override
public void run() {
Clipboard sysClip = Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().getSystemClipboard();
System.out.println("Current clipboard contents = " + getClipboardContents(sysClip));
sysClip.setContents(new StringSelection(toPaste), null);
System.out.println("New clipboard contents = " + getClipboardContents(sysClip));
}
public String getClipboardContents(Clipboard clipboard) {
String value = null;
boolean successful = false;
int retries = 0;
while (!successful && retries < 20) {
Transferable contents = clipboard.getContents(null);
if (contents.isDataFlavorSupported(DataFlavor.stringFlavor)) {
try {
value = (String) contents.getTransferData(DataFlavor.stringFlavor);
successful = true;
} catch (Exception exp) {
retries++;
exp.printStackTrace();
}
} else {
retries++;
}
}
System.out.println(successful + "/" + retries);
return value;
}
}
}
答案 1 :(得分：1)
你可以尝试重复粘贴动作，间隔1秒钟
public void pasteAtCursorLocation(String text)
{
setClip(text);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
theApp.updateOutput("Simulated Paste");
// put in a sleep 1 second here
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
rob.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_V);
rob.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
theApp.updateOutput("Simulated Paste");
}
粘贴2x可能会产生不同的结果。这种奇怪行为的原因可能是Windows管理剪贴板的方式。如果粘贴2x剪贴板会得到不同的结果，那么您就知道这种奇怪行为的根本原因不是在代码中找到，而是Java和Windows如何协同工作。