(基于电子邮件对话,现在记录用于信息共享)我在不同的层使用了两个模型:
public class TestDTO {
public int CustomerID { get; set; }
}
//...
public class Test {
public int CustomerID { get; set; }
}
和我的DTO层的lambda:
Expression<Func<TestDTO, bool>> fc1 =
(TestDTO c1) => c1.CustomerID <= 100 && c1.CustomerID >= 10;
如何将lambda(在一般情况下)转换为讨论其他模型:
Expression<Func<Test, bool>> fc2 = {insert magic here, based on fc1}
(显然,我们处于相同的测试条件,但使用Test
类型)
答案 0 :(得分:19)
要做到这一点,你必须完全重建表达式树;参数将需要重新映射,并且需要重新应用现在与不同类型通信的所有成员访问。幸运的是,ExpressionVisitor
类更容易实现这一点;例如(在一般情况下完成所有操作,而不仅仅是Func<T,bool>
谓词用法):
class TypeConversionVisitor : ExpressionVisitor
{
private readonly Dictionary<Expression, Expression> parameterMap;
public TypeConversionVisitor(
Dictionary<Expression, Expression> parameterMap)
{
this.parameterMap = parameterMap;
}
protected override Expression VisitParameter(ParameterExpression node)
{
// re-map the parameter
Expression found;
if(!parameterMap.TryGetValue(node, out found))
found = base.VisitParameter(node);
return found;
}
protected override Expression VisitMember(MemberExpression node)
{
// re-perform any member-binding
var expr = Visit(node.Expression);
if (expr.Type != node.Type)
{
MemberInfo newMember = expr.Type.GetMember(node.Member.Name)
.Single();
return Expression.MakeMemberAccess(expr, newMember);
}
return base.VisitMember(node);
}
}
在这里,我们传入一个参数字典来重新映射,并在VisitParameter
中应用它。我们还会在VisitMember
中检查我们是否已切换类型(如果Visit
涉及ParameterExpression
或其他MemberExpression
,则可能会发生这种情况):我们有,我们会尝试找到另一个同名的成员。
接下来,我们需要一个通用的lambda转换重写器方法:
// allows extension to other signatures later...
private static Expression<TTo> ConvertImpl<TFrom, TTo>(Expression<TFrom> from)
where TFrom : class
where TTo : class
{
// figure out which types are different in the function-signature
var fromTypes = from.Type.GetGenericArguments();
var toTypes = typeof(TTo).GetGenericArguments();
if (fromTypes.Length != toTypes.Length)
throw new NotSupportedException(
"Incompatible lambda function-type signatures");
Dictionary<Type, Type> typeMap = new Dictionary<Type,Type>();
for (int i = 0; i < fromTypes.Length; i++)
{
if (fromTypes[i] != toTypes[i])
typeMap[fromTypes[i]] = toTypes[i];
}
// re-map all parameters that involve different types
Dictionary<Expression, Expression> parameterMap
= new Dictionary<Expression, Expression>();
ParameterExpression[] newParams =
new ParameterExpression[from.Parameters.Count];
for (int i = 0; i < newParams.Length; i++)
{
Type newType;
if(typeMap.TryGetValue(from.Parameters[i].Type, out newType))
{
parameterMap[from.Parameters[i]] = newParams[i] =
Expression.Parameter(newType, from.Parameters[i].Name);
}
else
{
newParams[i] = from.Parameters[i];
}
}
// rebuild the lambda
var body = new TypeConversionVisitor(parameterMap).Visit(from.Body);
return Expression.Lambda<TTo>(body, newParams);
}
这需要一个Expression<TFrom>
和一个TTo
,将其转换为Expression<TTo>
,用:
TFrom
/ TTo
然后,将它们放在一起并公开我们的扩展方法:
public static class Helpers {
public static Expression<Func<TTo, bool>> Convert<TFrom, TTo>(
this Expression<Func<TFrom, bool>> from)
{
return ConvertImpl<Func<TFrom, bool>, Func<TTo, bool>>(from);
}
// insert from above: ConvertImpl
// insert from above: TypeConversionVisitor
}
et voila;一个通用的lambda转换例程,具体实现:
Expression<Func<Test, bool>> fc2 = fc1.Convert<TestDTO, Test>();
答案 1 :(得分:5)
您可以使用AutoMapper(无表达式树):
Mapper.CreateMap<Test, TestDTO>();
...
Func<TestDTO, bool> fc1 =
(TestDTO c1) => c1.CustomerID <= 100 && c1.CustomerID >= 10;
Func<Test, bool> fc2 =
(Test t) => fc1(Mapper.Map<Test, TestDTO>(t));