public class Bank {
private ArrayList<Account> accounts;
private int numberOfAccounts;
public Bank() {
numberOfAccounts = 0;
accounts = new ArrayList<Account>();
}
public int getNumOfAccounts() {
return numberOfAccounts;
}
public void addAccount(Account a) {
numberOfAccounts++;
accounts.add(a);
}
public Account findAccount(int id) {
int index = id - 1;
if (accounts.size() >= id){
return accounts.get(index);
}
else return null;
}
public void addMonthlyInterest() {
for (Account x : accounts) {
x.addMonthlyInterest();
}
}
public void removeAccount(Account a) {
numberOfAccounts--;
accounts.remove(a);
}
}
因此,当我将帐户添加到ArrayList,然后检查大小时,它会一直告诉我其中没有任何内容。我使用.add()
添加的方式有什么问题吗?
这是我的BankTest的一部分。我不确定要为testAddAccount(JUnit明智)使用什么,但我知道它们没有被添加,因为当我尝试查找帐户时,它们都不存在。
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import org.junit.Test;
public class BankTest {
private final ArrayList<Account> accounts = new ArrayList<Account>();
private Bank bank = new Bank();
private java.util.Random rand;
// private static final double[] RATES;
// private static final int[] TYPES;
SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
CheckingAccount ca = new CheckingAccount(0.034, 100);
CreditCardAccount cca = new CreditCardAccount(0.034, 100);
@Test
public void testAddAccount() {
// Tests Bank.addAccount() by adding many random accounts to the bank.
// SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
CheckingAccount ca = new CheckingAccount(0.034, 100);
CreditCardAccount cca = new CreditCardAccount(0.034, 100);
bank.addAccount(sa);
bank.addAccount(ca);
bank.addAccount(cca);
if (accounts.size() == 3){
System.out.println("true");
}else System.out.println("false");
}
@Test
public void testFindAccount() {
// Tests Bank.findAccount() by finding all existing accounts and
// attempting to find some non-existing accounts.
bank.addAccount(sa);
bank.addAccount(ca);
bank.addAccount(cca);
int size = accounts.size();
System.out.println(size);
accounts.get(0);
assertEquals(sa, bank.findAccount(1));
assertEquals(ca, bank.findAccount(2));
assertEquals(cca, bank.findAccount(3));
assertNull(bank.findAccount(50));
assertNull(bank.findAccount(80));
assertNull(bank.findAccount(230));
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:2)
我需要看看你如何实例化和使用Bank对象,但我猜你的问题就在那里。每当您创建新银行时,帐户列表都会初始化 - 您是否在尝试访问帐户列表时创建新银行?
答案 1 :(得分:1)
我会不手动跟踪#/帐户。出于几个不同的原因,这是“糟糕的”。这是另一种选择:
public class Bank {
private ArrayList<Account> accounts;
// private int numberOfAccounts; // No!
public Bank() {
// numberOfAccounts = 0; // No!
accounts = new ArrayList<Account>();
}
public int getNumOfAccounts() {
return accounts.size();
}
public void addAccount(Account a) {
// numberOfAccounts++; // No!
accounts.add(a);
}
答案 2 :(得分:1)
你没有检查正确的ArrayList!你的代码:
// what is accounts variable for?? Get rid of it.
private final ArrayList<Account> accounts = new ArrayList<Account>();
private Bank bank = new Bank();
private java.util.Random rand;
// private static final double[] RATES;
// private static final int[] TYPES;
SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
CheckingAccount ca = new CheckingAccount(0.034, 100);
CreditCardAccount cca = new CreditCardAccount(0.034, 100);
@Test
public void testAddAccount() {
// Tests Bank.addAccount() by adding many random accounts to the bank.
// SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
SavingsAccount sa = new SavingsAccount(0.034);
CheckingAccount ca = new CheckingAccount(0.034, 100);
CreditCardAccount cca = new CreditCardAccount(0.034, 100);
bank.addAccount(sa);
bank.addAccount(ca);
bank.addAccount(cca);
if (accounts.size() == 3){ // **** accounts.size()???
System.out.println("true");
}else System.out.println("false");
您正在检查accounts.size()
,并且帐户是一个本地变量,并且不知道银行持有的帐户,即银行对象。 account.size()应该是0,这完全合理。相反,为什么不检查bank变量所持有的大小呢?这就是为什么Bank有这种方法的原因:
if (banks.getNumOfAccounts() == 3){
System.out.println("true");
}else System.out.println("false");