这个问题有很多问题和答案以及文章,但我认为似乎没有真正明确/正确的答案
对我而言,Ayende迄今为止已经看到了最好的通用实现:http://ayende.com/blog/2500/generic-entity-equality
....但是从2007年开始....
这是实现这些方法的“最佳方式”,尤其是NHibernate 3.2,它在代理实现方面与早期版本存在一些差异吗?
答案 0 :(得分:5)
您应该覆盖Equals
和GetHashCode
。但是,你不应该做值相等(Name == other.Name && Age == other.Age
),你应该做同一性身份!
如果不这样做,您很可能会将实体的代理与真实实体进行比较,并且可以调试。例如:
public class Blog : EntityBase<Blog>
{
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
// This would be configured to lazy-load.
public virtual IList<Post> Posts { get; protected set; }
public Blog()
{
Posts = new List<Post>();
}
public virtual Post AddPost(string title, string body)
{
var post = new Post() { Title = title, Body = body, Blog = this };
Posts.Add(post);
return post;
}
}
public class Post : EntityBase<Post>
{
public virtual string Title { get; set; }
public virtual string Body { get; set; }
public virtual Blog Blog { get; set; }
public virtual bool Remove()
{
return Blog.Posts.Remove(this);
}
}
void Main(string[] args)
{
var post = session.Load<Post>(postId);
// If we didn't override Equals, the comparisons for
// "Blog.Posts.Remove(this)" would all fail because of reference equality.
// We'd end up be comparing "this" typeof(Post) with a collection of
// typeof(PostProxy)!
post.Remove();
// If we *didn't* override Equals and *just* did
// "post.Blog.Posts.Remove(post)", it'd work because we'd be comparing
// typeof(PostProxy) with a collection of typeof(PostProxy) (reference
// equality would pass!).
}
如果您使用int
作为Id
(也可以抽象为any identity type),这是一个示例基类:
public abstract class EntityBase<T>
where T : EntityBase<T>
{
public virtual int Id { get; protected set; }
protected bool IsTransient { get { return Id == 0; } }
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
return EntityEquals(obj as EntityBase<T>);
}
protected bool EntityEquals(EntityBase<T> other)
{
if (other == null)
{
return false;
}
// One entity is transient and the other is not.
else if (IsTransient ^ other.IsTransient)
{
return false;
}
// Both entities are not saved.
else if (IsTransient && other.IsTransient)
{
return ReferenceEquals(this, other);
}
else
{
// Compare transient instances.
return Id == other.Id;
}
}
// The hash code is cached because a requirement of a hash code is that
// it does not change once calculated. For example, if this entity was
// added to a hashed collection when transient and then saved, we need
// the same hash code or else it could get lost because it would no
// longer live in the same bin.
private int? cachedHashCode;
public override int GetHashCode()
{
if (cachedHashCode.HasValue) return cachedHashCode.Value;
cachedHashCode = IsTransient ? base.GetHashCode() : Id.GetHashCode();
return cachedHashCode.Value;
}
// Maintain equality operator semantics for entities.
public static bool operator ==(EntityBase<T> x, EntityBase<T> y)
{
// By default, == and Equals compares references. In order to
// maintain these semantics with entities, we need to compare by
// identity value. The Equals(x, y) override is used to guard
// against null values; it then calls EntityEquals().
return Object.Equals(x, y);
}
// Maintain inequality operator semantics for entities.
public static bool operator !=(EntityBase<T> x, EntityBase<T> y)
{
return !(x == y);
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
我个人的建议是根本不要实施这些方法,因为这样做会在很多情况下强制加载。
此外,如果您不跨会话移动实体,您将永远不需要这样。即使你这样做,也可以在需要的时候通过Id进行比较。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
我在实施@TheCloudlessSky建议的解决方案时遇到了多个问题。
首先,我的ID没有一致的数据类型;有些是Sub copyformuladown14()
copyRange As Range
'Set range variable to F6 on sheet1
Set copyRange = Sheet1.Range("F6")
'Starting at row 20, loop every 14 rows and paste
'you have to monkey with number "20"
For i = 20 To 2533 Step 14
copyRange.Copy Destination:=Sheet1.Range("F6").Offset(i)
Next i
End Sub
,有些是int
,有些是Guid
。此外,一些是自动生成的,而另一些是手动分配的。如果我决定使用复合ID,将来可能会出现其他问题。因此,我不能把
string
<{1>}基类中的。我必须在各自具体的实体类中定义它。
其次,因为我在基类中没有public virtual int Id { get; protected set; }
,所以实现EntityBase
属性变得越来越难。
所以,我决定为每个实例生成Id
并使用它来实现bool IsTransient
和Guid
,如下所示:
GetHashCode