Go中确实需要它们吗?我已阅读https://gobyexample.com/mutexes并多次运行示例代码,当我删除mutex.Lock()
和mutex.Unlock()
时,它们的工作原理完全相同。
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我已阅读https://gobyexample.com/mutexes并运行示例代码 多次,当我删除mutex.Lock()和mutex.Unlock()时,它可以工作 完全一样。
正如预期的那样,当我删除互斥锁时,会出现数据争夺和恐慌。
输出:
$ go run -race racer.go
fatal error: concurrent map read and map write
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c00009a690 by goroutine 113:
runtime.mapassign_fast64()
/home/peter/go/src/runtime/map_fast64.go:92 +0x0
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xba
Previous read at 0x00c00009a690 by goroutine 64:
runtime.mapaccess1_fast64()
/home/peter/go/src/runtime/map_fast64.go:12 +0x0
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x72
Goroutine 113 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
Goroutine 64 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c00009a690 by goroutine 115:
runtime.mapassign_fast64()
/home/peter/go/src/runtime/map_fast64.go:92 +0x0
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xba
Previous read at 0x00c00009a690 by goroutine 39:
runtime.mapaccess1_fast64()
/home/peter/go/src/runtime/map_fast64.go:12 +0x0
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x72
Goroutine 115 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
Goroutine 39 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0001f0048 by goroutine 79:
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x80
Previous write at 0x00c0001f0048 by goroutine 113:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Goroutine 79 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
Goroutine 113 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 81:
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x80
Previous write at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 115:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Goroutine 81 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
Goroutine 115 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 106:
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x80
Previous write at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 115:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Goroutine 106 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
Goroutine 115 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Read at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 94:
main.main.func1()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:37 +0x80
Previous write at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 115:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Goroutine 94 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:29 +0xe0
Goroutine 115 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
==================
==================
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 114:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Previous write at 0x00c0001f0050 by goroutine 115:
main.main.func2()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:56 +0xcf
Goroutine 114 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
Goroutine 115 (running) created at:
main.main()
/home/peter/gopath/src/so/racer.go:51 +0x124
==================
exit status 2
$
racer.go
:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"math/rand"
//*"sync"
"sync/atomic"
"time"
)
func main() {
// For our example the state will be a map.
var state = make(map[int]int)
// This mutex will synchronize access to state.
//*var mutex = &sync.Mutex{}
// We’ll keep track of how many read and write operations we do.
var readOps uint64
var writeOps uint64
// Here we start 100 goroutines to execute repeated reads against the state, once per millisecond in each goroutine.
for r := 0; r < 100; r++ {
go func() {
total := 0
for {
// For each read we pick a key to access, Lock() the mutex to ensure exclusive access to the state, read the value at the chosen key, Unlock() the mutex, and increment the readOps count.
key := rand.Intn(5)
//*mutex.Lock()
total += state[key]
//*mutex.Unlock()
atomic.AddUint64(&readOps, 1)
// Wait a bit between reads.
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
}
}()
}
// We’ll also start 10 goroutines to simulate writes, using the same pattern we did for reads.
for w := 0; w < 10; w++ {
go func() {
for {
key := rand.Intn(5)
val := rand.Intn(100)
//*mutex.Lock()
state[key] = val
//*mutex.Unlock()
atomic.AddUint64(&writeOps, 1)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
}
}()
}
// Let the 10 goroutines work on the state and mutex for a second.
time.Sleep(time.Second)
// Take and report final operation counts.
readOpsFinal := atomic.LoadUint64(&readOps)
fmt.Println("readOps:", readOpsFinal)
writeOpsFinal := atomic.LoadUint64(&writeOps)
fmt.Println("writeOps:", writeOpsFinal)
// With a final lock of state, show how it ended up.
//*mutex.Lock()
fmt.Println("state:", state)
//*mutex.Unlock()
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
是的,go中的映射不是线程安全的。在此示例中,映射访问可能来自多个线程。从多个线程写入映射或从多个线程写入和读取映射时,将发生未定义的行为。但是,何时以及是否发生取决于时间。因此,删除互斥锁可能会在将来的某个时候导致数据损坏或崩溃。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
您无法一次通过多个go例程访问map
。
它可能会工作一段时间,但注定会失败或导致意外结果。
Mutex保证,只有一个go例程才能同时对Lock
和Unlock
之间的一段代码进行操作。
或者,您可以使用sync.Map
,该线程对于读取和写入是线程安全的。
m := new(sync.Map)
go func() {
for r := 0; true; r++ {
m.Store(r, r)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond)
}
}()
go func() {
for r := 0; true; r++ {
res, ok := m.Load(r)
if ok {
fmt.Println(res)
}
time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond)
}
}()
同步。地图并不总是意味着线程安全
sync.Map
的读取(Load)和写入(Store)是原子的,即立即从不同的go例程调用它们将按预期方式工作/不会破坏数据或引发错误。
但是,组成不同的sync.Map
可能不是原子的,因此也不是线程安全的。
例如,
val, ok := m.Load("someKey")
if !ok {
m.Store("someKey", LoadData())
}
如果此代码一次从不同的go例程运行,那么即使没有预期,这两个go例程也有可能进入if
语句并加载数据。
因此,有时您可能最终需要使用互斥锁而不是sync.Map
val, ok := m.Load("someKey")
if !ok {
mutex.Lock()
defer mutex.Unlock()
val, ok = m.Load("someKey")
if !ok {
m.Store("someKey", LoadData())
}
}