我对面向对象的设计存有疑问。假设我必须为电话实施通用的账单评估程序。在输入中,我可以使用呼叫记录(数字和持续时间,以秒为单位),我想得到每个呼叫的价格。
我认为使用通用的调用类和抽象的 BillEvaluator ,对于每次调用,根据抽象函数设置“账单策略”IStragety 。 每个子类(OrangeBill,VodafoneBill,..)都必须根据某些标准(持续时间,数量......)实施账单策略。最后,实际价格由实现IStragety的类评估。
这是一个很好的解决方案吗?如果我想尝试一个新的PhoneOperator,那么我将不得不创建一个新的BillHandler子类,或者我是否可以创建一个新的IStrategy实现。但如果沃达丰决定添加新的账单策略(例如,超过1小时的通话是免费的),那么我将不得不修改VodafoneBill类...所以我的解决方案不尊重SOLID原则!
这是代码(为了简单起见,避免了所有的get / set和检查):
import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
// A generic call, with a number, duration in seconds
// and a price (to evaluate)
class Call{
public String number;
public int duration;
public double price;
public Call(String number, int duration){
this.number = number;
this.duration = duration;
}
public String toString(){
return number + " (" + duration + ")-->" + price;
}
}
// Strategy to determine the price of a call
interface IStrategy{
void setCost(Call call);
}
// Each seconds of the call is charged of 3 cents
class secondsPrice implements IStrategy{
public void setCost(Call call){
call.price = 0.03 * call.duration;
}
}
// each minutes of the conversation is charged 55 cents
// round the minutes value Es. 3:02 => 4 minutes.
class minutesPrice implements IStrategy{
public void setCost(Call call){
int duration = call.duration;
int minutes = duration / 60;
if(duration % 60 > 0){
minutes = minutes + 1;
}
call.price = 0.55 * minutes;
}
}
// each minutes of conversation is charged 1 cents.
class lowPrice implements IStrategy{
public void setCost(Call call){
call.price = 0.01 * (call.duration / 60);
}
}
// Generic class that set the price for each
// call in the log
abstract class BillHandler{
public void evaluateBill(List<Call> log){
for(Call aCall : log){
IStrategy s = billStrategy(aCall);
s.setCost(aCall);
}
}
abstract IStrategy billStrategy(Call call);
}
// Concrete implementation of the Orange Billing strategy.
class OrangeBill extends BillHandler{
IStrategy billStrategy(Call call){
if(call.duration <= 180){
return new secondsPrice();
}
else{
return new minutesPrice();
}
}
}
class VodafoneBill extends BillHandler{
IStrategy billStrategy(Call call){
if(call.number.equals("122")){
return new lowPrice();
}
else if(call.duration < 100){
return new secondsPrice();
}
else{
return new minutesPrice();
}
}
}
class myCode
{
public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
{
myCode c = new myCode();
List<Call> log = new ArrayList<>();
log.add(new Call("122", 180));
log.add(new Call("114", 179));
log.add(new Call("122", 200));
log.add(new Call("411", 54));
System.out.println(log);
BillHandler bill = new OrangeBill();
bill.evaluateBill(log);
System.out.println("OrangeBill:");
System.out.println(log);
bill = new VodafoneBill();
bill.evaluateBill(log);
System.out.println("VodafoneBill:");
System.out.println(log);
}
}
使用责任链模式
进行可能的实施import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;
// A generic call, with a number, duration in seconds
// and a price (to evaluate)
class Call{
public String number;
public int duration;
public double price;
public Call(String number, int duration){
this.number = number;
this.duration = duration;
}
public String toString(){
return number + " (" + duration + ")-->" + price;
}
}
// Interface implemented by different Provider
interface BillHandler{
void priceCall(Call call);
}
//Orange provider
class OrangeBill implements BillHandler{
private callHandler secondsH = new orangeSecondsHandler();
private callHandler minutesH = new orangeMinutesHandler();
private callHandler commondH = new commonFareHandler();
public void priceCall(Call call){
secondsH.processCall(call);
}
OrangeBill(){
secondsH.setSuccessor(minutesH);
minutesH.setSuccessor(commondH);
}
}
// Vodafone provider
class VodafoneBill implements BillHandler{
private callHandler secondsH = new vodafoneSecondsHandler();
private callHandler minutesH = new vodafoneMinutesHandler();
private callHandler lowCallH = new vodafoneLowCallHandler();
private callHandler commondH = new commonFareHandler();
public void priceCall(Call call){
secondsH.processCall(call);
}
VodafoneBill(){
lowCallH.setSuccessor(secondsH);
secondsH.setSuccessor(minutesH);
minutesH.setSuccessor(commondH);
}
}
// Generic call handler
abstract class callHandler{
public callHandler next;
public void setSuccessor(callHandler next){
this.next = next;
}
abstract public boolean isChargable(Call call);
abstract public void priceCall(Call call);
public void processCall(Call call){
if(isChargable(call)){
priceCall(call);
}
else{
next.processCall(call);
}
}
}
// Concrete implementations of different call handler based
// on its provider policy
// Each seconds of the call is charged of 3 cents
class orangeSecondsHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return call.duration <= 180;
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
call.price = 0.03 * call.duration;
}
}
// each minutes of the conversation is charged 55 cents
// round the minutes value Es. 3:02 => 4 minutes.
class orangeMinutesHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return call.duration <= 180;
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
int duration = call.duration;
int minutes = duration / 60;
if(duration % 60 > 0){
minutes = minutes + 1;
}
call.price = 0.55 * minutes;
}
}
// Each seconds of the call is charged of 5 cents
class vodafoneSecondsHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return call.duration <= 100;
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
call.price = 0.05 * call.duration;
}
}
// each minutes of the conversation is charged 30 cents
// round the minutes value Es. 3:02 => 4 minutes.
class vodafoneMinutesHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return call.duration <= 250;
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
int duration = call.duration;
int minutes = duration / 60;
if(duration % 60 > 0){
minutes = minutes + 1;
}
call.price = 0.30 * minutes;
}
}
// Call to selected number are charged by 0.02 cents
// for every minute, without round!
class vodafoneLowCallHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return call.number.equals("122");
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
int duration = call.duration;
int minutes = duration / 60;
call.price = 0.02 * minutes;
}
}
class commonFareHandler extends callHandler{
public boolean isChargable(Call call){
return true;
}
public void priceCall(Call call){
call.price = 1 * call.duration;
}
}
class myCode
{
public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
{
myCode c = new myCode();
List<Call> log = new ArrayList<>();
log.add(new Call("122", 180));
log.add(new Call("114", 179));
log.add(new Call("122", 200));
log.add(new Call("411", 54));
System.out.println(log);
// Evaluate the bill with Orange
BillHandler bill = new OrangeBill();
for(Call call : log)
bill.priceCall(call);
System.out.println("OrangeBill:");
System.out.println(log);
// Evaluate the bill with Vodafone
bill = new VodafoneBill();
for(Call call : log)
bill.priceCall(call);
System.out.println("VodafoneBill:");
System.out.println(log);
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我可以提出以下建议:
IStrategy
对我来说似乎多余。一种策略适用于多个运营商的概率似乎很低。因此,如果策略与运营商之间存在1:1的映射,我会删除额外的接口。BillHandler
,因为这样可以让您摆脱Call
上的多个if-else条件。请看this示例。